Comment #4 on issue 610 by chr4...@googlemail.com: Debian packaging of
control: Depends only gambas3-runtime
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=610
Thank you for clarification. Hmm. But there it is the same. If the
dependencies are defined in the 'information' tab, debian packa
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #3 on issue 610 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Debian packaging of
control: Depends only gambas3-runtime
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=610
The dependencies of a component are not defined by the components used by
the project, but by the
Comment #2 on issue 610 by chr4...@googlemail.com: Debian packaging of
control: Depends only gambas3-runtime
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=610
Sorry, did not realize that you answered (got no mail or overlooked it).
Attached is a project and the created Debian .deb. If you
Il 28/03/2015 21:42, Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
> Le 24/03/2015 12:02, Gian a écrit :
>> Il 24/03/2015 11:43, Charlie Reinl ha scritto:
>>> Salut,
>>>
>>> I can confirm that behave, but you can go behind of the dec-comma.
>>> When entering the comma the box make left shift and keeps staying before
Le 24/03/2015 12:02, Gian a écrit :
> Il 24/03/2015 11:43, Charlie Reinl ha scritto:
>> Salut,
>>
>> I can confirm that behave, but you can go behind of the dec-comma.
>> When entering the comma the box make left shift and keeps staying before
>> the comma.
>
> Yes I know, but it is not normal and
Comment #4 on issue 455 by gambas...@gmail.com: gb.report generates a
report too bigger
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=455
This was solved by changing the resolution on file saving
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notificat
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #3 on issue 455 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: gb.report generates a
report too bigger
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=455
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
Comment #2 on issue 488 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Gambas Editor calculates
cursor-positions wrong for some fontsizes
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=488
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
iss
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #6 on issue 476 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Sqlite3 returns date in
different format from similar syntax
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=476
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is c
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #7 on issue 458 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Repeated CRITICAL messages
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=458
No news for one year. Closing the issue. The messages come from the GTK+
theme in use.
--
You received this message because this
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #3 on issue 467 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Printing example in
Gambas 3.5 "Save in Folder" does not change destination for printing
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=467
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this messa
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 424 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: whole Gambas IDE shutdown
trying to make an SQL Query in the SQL-Frame by using SQLite3
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=424
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this messag
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Comment #5 on issue 423 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Menu in form attached to
workspace not visible
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=423
(No comment was entered for this change.)
--
You received this message because this project is configured to se
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #12 on issue 406 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Bug in project form
design: the forms are not visibles!
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=406
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is confi
Linux Mint 17.0 (fresh, updated image with required libraries)
automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
libtool (GNU libtool) 2.4.2
gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2
g++ (Ubuntu 4.8.2-19ubuntu1) 4.8.2
Builds, executes and installs normally without modification.
(
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #3 on issue 396 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Gambas crashes when
having a module named f
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=396
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #2 on issue 369 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Application menu is not
shown.
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=369
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #7 on issue 284 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: WebView crashes on some
sites
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=284
No news from one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue
Updates:
Status: WontFix
Comment #6 on issue 170 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Error balloon is placed
behind database connection window
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=170
No news for one year, closing the issue.
--
You received this message because this project is conf
Updates:
Status: NeedsInfo
Comment #2 on issue 606 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Gtk3 signal #11 with rev.
6910
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=606
Can you provide a project please?
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notif
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Labels: -3.7.0 Version-3.7.0
Comment #1 on issue 615 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: Printer.configure cause
segfault (signal #11) with GTK3
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=615
Yep, there is something weird in recent GTK+3 printing support.
I over reacted to begin with.
Thus I will not continue to further beat this dead horse. :-)
Lewis
On 03/28/2015 02:27 PM, Benoît Minisini wrote:
> Le 28/03/2015 20:22, Lewis Balentine a écrit :
>> It is just I have heard too many times that SQL tables must have primary
>> keys ... and it just is
Le 28/03/2015 20:22, Lewis Balentine a écrit :
> It is just I have heard too many times that SQL tables must have primary
> keys ... and it just is not true.
>
It depends on what you mean by "must". It is not technically mandatory,
but if you create a table without a primary key, you will have pr
My real point was (and I probably stated it very badly) is there is
nothing in SQL that requires a table to have a primary key defined. Thus
one should not assume such key exist unless it is a known DB structure.
For a known structure there is probably an alternative aproach (orber by
something
Il 28/03/2015 18:55, Benoît Minisini ha scritto:
Hi,
I have uploaded to sourceforge the source package of Gambas 3.7.1 so
that you can check it before the release.
So tell me if you have any problem with it.
It includes all the bugs fixed since the Gambas 3.7.0 release, and the
ability to open
SQLite (at least the current versions) will always have a row number:
"/SELECT/rowid FROM ..."
If the system does not have a unique row number built it (the only thing
that I use these days is SQLite) then it should be able to be generated
"on the fly" using a calculated field along with the q
Le 28/03/2015 19:09, Benoît Minisini a écrit :
> Le 28/03/2015 18:58, Lewis Balentine a écrit :
>> I have over three decades of dealing with SQL and I can still not
>> understand how this myth got propagated.
>>
>> There is NO valid SQL reason why a table should be required to have a
>> unique prim
Le 28/03/2015 18:58, Lewis Balentine a écrit :
> I have over three decades of dealing with SQL and I can still not
> understand how this myth got propagated.
>
> There is NO valid SQL reason why a table should be required to have a
> unique primary key or any predefined key for that matter. One can
I have over three decades of dealing with SQL and I can still not
understand how this myth got propagated.
There is NO valid SQL reason why a table should be required to have a
unique primary key or any predefined key for that matter. One can always
use the row number (record number) if such a
Hi,
I have uploaded to sourceforge the source package of Gambas 3.7.1 so
that you can check it before the release.
So tell me if you have any problem with it.
It includes all the bugs fixed since the Gambas 3.7.0 release, and the
ability to open projects installed from the Gambas "farm" direct
Updates:
Status: NeedsInfo
Comment #1 on issue 611 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: TRUNK bug postgresql
connection don't send password at runtime
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=611
You must either:
- Provide the password yourself.
- Add the gb.desktop component to your pr
Updates:
Status: Accepted
Comment #4 on issue 612 by benoit.m...@gmail.com: BUG Cannot browse more of
128 records on tables "No current connection"
https://code.google.com/p/gambas/issues/detail?id=612
The reason why DataBrowser or DataView fails is because your table does not
have a
32 matches
Mail list logo
