http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.995&from=L21haW4-
Comment #1 by PICCORO LENZ MCKAY:
its a compiler support problem insherits from llvm, so invalidating this bug
due gcc 4.3/4.4 does not support C++-11 standard
PICCORO LENZ MCKAY changed the state of the bug to: Invalid.
u are not use the 3.2 llvm.. seems are 3.3+
Lenz McKAY Gerardo (PICCORO)
http://qgqlochekone.blogspot.com
2016-09-09 14:29 GMT-04:00 Ron :
> Seems to compile and run fine here! (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 Bits)
>
> Regards,
> Ron.
>
> 2016-09-09 9:34 GMT+02:00 Christof Thalhofer :
> > Am 09.09.2016 um
Seems to compile and run fine here! (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS 64 Bits)
Regards,
Ron.
2016-09-09 9:34 GMT+02:00 Christof Thalhofer :
> Am 09.09.2016 um 00:33 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
>
>> I will make it official very soon, so if you have a problem that you
>> don't report, you will have to wait the next v
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.995&from=L21haW4-
PICCORO LENZ MCKAY reported a new bug.
Summary
---
jit module compiling with 3.2 llvm: error: invalid pure specifier
Type : Bug
Priority : High
Gambas version : 3.9
Product : Development Enviro
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.855&from=L21haW4-
Comment #14 by PICCORO LENZ MCKAY:
but in my QT4 instalation does'nt have that problem.. no cpu usage at all
--
___
hi benoit and from Moviga, i have a problem (i'll reported right now)
in my backports i never compiles and enabled the jit
today finally backported the llvm 3.2 and enable it in gambas but got
compilation problems in debian squeeze and also lenny:
before reporting i'll search similiar error in t
Any progress with the jit compilation error under Arch?
--
___
Gambas-user mailing list
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
http://gambaswiki.org/bugtracker/edit?object=BUG.855&from=L21haW4-
Comment #13 by Fabien BODARD:
In mint 18 xfce,
QT4 50 % usage on dual core
QT5 No usage
GTK2 No Usage
GTK3 No usage
The problem here is only on QT4 ... but i don't know the causes
Maybe a loop on the _draw event call ... i mu
2016-09-09 2:23 GMT-04:00 Christof Thalhofer :
> Maybe for a Java programmer with big iron and big frameworks in the
> background that do the job it is ok.
>
that the object of the gambas webservice component,
in java its great due programer dont have to mess with the complex of the
process, only
Am 09.09.2016 um 00:33 schrieb Benoît Minisini:
> I will make it official very soon, so if you have a problem that you
> don't report, you will have to wait the next version.
Except Bug 983 (which is not important) all my tests are running fine.
Alles Gute
Christof Thalhofer
--
Dies ist kei
10 matches
Mail list logo