--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24
14:28 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
And any ICE is a regression even if it was changed from accepts invalid code.
There was a discussion
about this before already.
--
http://gcc.gnu.o
--- Additional Comments From sstrasser at systemhaus-gruppe dot de
2005-02-24 14:24 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I think it is a minor regression.
3.3/3.4 treats the code correctly if the specialization(unlike above) is a
definition. 4.0 does not.
no regression with exactly this
--- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-24
12:27 ---
Hmm. I don't know whether this is really a regression.
We never treated this code correctly. We have an ICE in 2.95.x
and mainline. In 3.0 - 3.4.4 we accept the code where we shouldn't.
--
Wha
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-23
12:26 ---
Confirmed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ev
