[Bug c++/39126] Missing "move" constructor call (C++0x rvalue references)

2009-05-08 Thread gbrammer at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from gbrammer at gmx dot de 2009-05-08 19:17 --- Well, I am sure that it shouldn't be created, but rereading the spec (http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n2118.html 12.8) I noticed that this bug is not in g++, but by design. I had hoped that rvalue ref

[Bug c++/39126] Missing "move" constructor call (C++0x rvalue references)

2009-05-07 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-07 19:09 --- Are you sure that an implicit copy constructor is not supposed to be created here? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39126

[Bug c++/39126] Missing "move" constructor call (C++0x rvalue references)

2009-05-07 Thread gbrammer at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from gbrammer at gmx dot de 2009-05-07 19:05 --- Still happens with "g++-4.4 (Debian 4.4.0-4) 4.4.1". Here's a version with printfs in the destructor and constructors: extern "C" { int printf(const char *format, ...); } struct Foo { Foo(Foo && from) { printf("move co