--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-30 01:01
---
The first right statement in the original test case is valid fortran and gives
the correct result.
The second write statement is invalid Fortran. An unallocated allocatable array
has no size. It is up to the pro
--- Comment #3 from terry at chem dot gu dot se 2009-03-29 23:50 ---
Not a dupe of PR20520. That one is for questionable code producing (or not)
some unexpected (to some) output, and crashing when run. This is illegal code
that compiles AND RUNS quietly. Here unallocated is giving the
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-03-29 07:51
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20520 ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
GCC host t
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 09:03 ---
Very similar to PR20520.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36761
