--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 14:17 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.3 as obvious.
Thanks for the report
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 12:37 ---
Subject: Bug 37794
Author: pault
Date: Sat Oct 11 12:36:13 2008
New Revision: 141058
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141058
Log:
2008-10-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 12:10 ---
Subject: Bug 37794
Author: pault
Date: Sat Oct 11 12:09:23 2008
New Revision: 141057
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=141057
Log:
2008-10-11 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-11 10:40 ---
This is my doing - see fix for PRs36374 and 37274. The offending block of code
is redundant. The subsequently developed elements of the patch covered the
problems and I just had not twigged the redundancy.
I'll fix
--- Comment #2 from J dot Hogg at rl dot ac dot uk 2008-10-10 11:38 ---
I agree code is invalid Fortran and should be rejected [though it can be made
valid quite easily by supplying the missing type].
Works fine on both 4.3 and 4.3.1 on this machine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-10 11:26 ---
I might have done something wrong, but the program below fails here with a
memory-access error not only with 4.4 but also with 4.3. Additionally, the
program is rejected with 4.1 and 4.2 - and with NAG f95, ifort and
