https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45274
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 08:01 ---
I don't think this has anything to do with restrict and all with lowering
bitfield accesses only during expansion, and at RTL level the bitfield
operations being too big for combiner to optimize them.
--
http://gc