--- Comment #37 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2010-07-23 08:43 ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Please refrain from fiddling with the bug status: whoever does the backport
> will
> do this himself.
>
> Thanks.
> Rainer
>
I have no interest in your posts and have marked your emails to
--- Comment #36 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 09:09 ---
Fixed on all active branches.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Comment #35 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 38946
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jul 21 09:06:42 2010
New Revision: 162367
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162367
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-06-25 Jerry DeLisle
--- Comment #34 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 09:06 ---
Subject: Bug 38946
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jul 21 09:05:47 2010
New Revision: 162366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162366
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2010-06-25 Jerry DeLisle
--- Comment #33 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-21
07:56 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran
failing tests that worked previously
> --- Comment #32 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:37
> ---
--- Comment #32 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:37
---
Rainer, this is OK to back port. Do you want me to do so?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #31 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 19:23 ---
Please refrain from fiddling with the bug status: whoever does the backport
will
do this himself.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #30 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2010-07-20 18:46 ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Subject: Bug 38946
> Author: jvdelisle
> Date: Fri Jun 25 21:32:37 2010
> New Revision: 161416
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161416
> Log:
> 2010-06-25 Jerry DeLisle
--- Comment #29 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-07-09
19:17 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran
failing tests that worked previously
May I backport the patch to the 4.4 and 4.5 branches, too?
Thanks.
Rainer
--
--- Comment #28 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 21:32
---
Subject: Bug 38946
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Jun 25 21:32:37 2010
New Revision: 161416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161416
Log:
2010-06-25 Jerry DeLisle
PR testsuite/38946
--- Comment #27 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-06-25
20:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran
failing tests that worked previously
> --- Comment #26 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 20:41
> ---
--- Comment #26 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 20:41
---
I will commit the change
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-06-25
20:34 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran
failing tests that worked previously
Jerry,
> Try this version of the test case and see what it does. If this fails, I will
--- Comment #24 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 20:20
---
Created an attachment (id=21009)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21009&action=view)
Modified array_constructor_23.f to allow for some precision error
Rainer,
Try this version of the test cas
--- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-06-25
19:26 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran
failing tests that worked previously
Great, thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #22 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 19:24
---
Rainer,
I will look at the array_constructor_23.f itself and see what the front-end is
doing with it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #21 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-25 18:56 ---
Jerry, could you perhaps have a look at this one, too? This is the last
remaining
fortran testsuite failure on Solaris 11/x86.
Thanks.
Rainer
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #20 from rob1weld at aol dot com 2010-06-20 02:05 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Confirmed: fails for 32-bit and Solaris 10+, unsupported on Solaris 8 and 9.
>
Thanks for looking into this,
Rob
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #19 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 16:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=20858)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20858&action=view)
assembler output at -O3
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #18 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-07 16:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=20857)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20857&action=view)
assembler output at -O0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #17 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE 2010-06-07
16:32 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc trunk 143562 - Testsuite - gfortran
failing tests that worked previously
I've now analysed this further: the test only fails at -O3. The failure
is an abort in l
--- Comment #16 from ro at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-06-04 12:53 ---
Confirmed: fails for 32-bit and Solaris 10+, unsupported on Solaris 8 and 9.
--
ro at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.4 |4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
23 matches
Mail list logo
