http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #7)
> Created attachment 30712 [details]
> fixed test case
>
> Looking deeper into the matter it seems like this an example
> where vectorisation is not supposed to h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 30712
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30712&action=edit
fixed test case
Looking deeper into the matter it seems like this an example
where vectorisation is not supposed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> The test case
> gcc.dg/vect/pr56933.c fails on a pentium II,
> because of invalid
> instruction.
>
> A fairly obvi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener 2013-04-15
11:18:43 UTC ---
/* { dg-do run } */
extern void abort (void);
void __attribute__((noinline,noclone))
foo (double *b, double *d, double *f)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56933
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
