[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759

--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Robert Dubner :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3e721f489ebed71fccb4a2ebb5add92e8ddc206

commit r15-9537-gc3e721f489ebed71fccb4a2ebb5add92e8ddc206
Author: Bob Dubner 
Date:   Wed Apr 16 14:41:06 2025 -0400

cobol: Eliminate gcc/cobol/LICENSE. [PR119759]

gcc/cobol

PR cobol/119759
* LICENSE: Deleted.

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-16 Thread rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759

Robert Dubner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |rdubner at gcc dot 
gnu.org
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #6 from Robert Dubner  ---
Done.

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-16 Thread rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759

Robert Dubner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rdubner at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Robert Dubner  ---
The fact that there is a gcc/cobol/LICENSE file reflects the evolution; when we
started work on the gcc-cobol fork of gcc, it wasn't clear that we were going
to pursue donating our efforts to the FSF.

We don't need the LICENSE file in gcc/cobol, nor do we need one in libgcobol

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-14 Thread simonsobisch at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759

--- Comment #3 from Simon Sobisch  ---
Note "Copyright (c) 2021-2025 Symas Corporation" is also part of several files,
for example gcc/gcobol/parse.y

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-14 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener  ---
I think we allow license files in parts that are managed elsewhere.  And we do
want to have license files in runtime libraries, but libgcobol lacks one.  So
possibly we should simply move the file ...

[Bug cobol/119759] LICENSE file in gcc/cobol

2025-04-12 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs 
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119759

--- Comment #1 from Sam James  ---
I'm not sure why it's even BSD to begin with. I did try to ask on the ML but
didn't get an answer.

Besides, if it's part of GCC, the whole thing is GPL anyway.