[Bug libstdc++/120390] Request to improve error with private destructor

[nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390

--- Comment #6 from nightstrike  ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> (In reply to nightstrike from comment #3)
> > I know it isn't a bug,
> 
> You're missing the point. It *is* a bug if the diagnostic is bad. My point
> is that it's not a *compiler* bug, it's a library bug.
> 
> The compiler is doing exactly what the library code tells it to do.

Ah, thank you for the clarification.  I didn't understand that distinction, as
you surmised.

[Bug libstdc++/120390] Request to improve error with private destructor

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120390

Jonathan Wakely  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|c++ |libstdc++

--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely  ---
(In reply to nightstrike from comment #3)
> I know it isn't a bug,

You're missing the point. It *is* a bug if the diagnostic is bad. My point is
that it's not a *compiler* bug, it's a library bug.

The compiler is doing exactly what the library code tells it to do.