[Bug target/118772] BPF doesn't actually support effective-target 'exceptions'?

[tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118772

Thomas Schwinge  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |tschwinge at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge  ---
.

[Bug target/118772] BPF doesn't actually support effective-target 'exceptions'?

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118772

--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits  ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e90276a4831553268f3dd4917d7b6ae9c08dbf0f

commit r15-7440-ge90276a4831553268f3dd4917d7b6ae9c08dbf0f
Author: Thomas Schwinge 
Date:   Thu Feb 6 16:31:38 2025 +0100

BPF doesn't actually support effective-target 'exceptions' [PR118772]

PR target/118772
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/target-supports.exp (check_effective_target_exceptions):
'return 0' for '[istarget bpf-*-*]'.

[Bug target/118772] BPF doesn't actually support effective-target 'exceptions'?

[jemarch at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118772

--- Comment #1 from Jose E. Marchesi  ---
Hello Thomas.

I can confirm it is ok to get check_effective_target_exceptions to return 0 for
bpf-*-* targets.  Thanks!