[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

[sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683

sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It only took 15 years to fix this.  :-P

[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

[sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683

Sam James  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |15.0

[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

[cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683

--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by Sandra Loosemore :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f7a2f0aa6bd28c054cecfda9d2c499a304cd4c2a

commit r15-9472-gf7a2f0aa6bd28c054cecfda9d2c499a304cd4c2a
Author: Sandra Loosemore 
Date:   Tue Apr 15 00:56:30 2025 +

Doc: clarify -march=pentiumpro has no MMX support [PR42683]

gcc/ChangeLog
PR target/42683
* doc/invoke.texi (x86 Options): Clarify that -march=pentiumpro
doesn't include MMX.

[Bug target/42683] gcc manpage: Description of x86 -march not clear regarding mmx

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-02-07 19:51 ---
Confirmed.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
  Component|other   |target
 Ever Confirmed|0   |1
   Keywords||documentation
   Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-02-07 19:51:59
   date||


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42683