[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791

Andrew Pinski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Resolution|WORKSFORME  |---
 Status|RESOLVED|NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2025-04-14

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski  ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
> That's expected because -fstack-clash-protection is a no-op on Windows (the
> ABI already mandates stack checking there).

Then the testcase should be skipped ...

[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

[ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791

Eric Botcazou  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou  ---
That's expected because -fstack-clash-protection is a no-op on Windows (the ABI
already mandates stack checking there).

[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

[nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791

--- Comment #1 from nightstrike  ---
Created attachment 61102
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61102&action=edit
RTL on linux

[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

[nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791

--- Comment #3 from nightstrike  ---
Created attachment 61104
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61104&action=edit
asm on Linux

[Bug testsuite/119791] FAIL: gcc.dg/stack-check-10.c on Windows

[nightstrike at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119791

--- Comment #2 from nightstrike  ---
Created attachment 61103
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61103&action=edit
asm on Windows