[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-12-09 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener  ---
No answer so I assume yes.  Please re-open if not.

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-10-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener  ---
Was this resolved meanwhile?

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

H.J. Lu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Attachment #61909|0   |1
is obsolete||

--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu  ---
Created attachment 61910
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61910&action=edit
A patch

Try this instead.

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-18 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu  ---
Created attachment 61909
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61909&action=edit
A patch

Try this.

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-18 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE  ---
> --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu  ---
[...]
> Please try:
>
> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=49739

While that patch (as merged) fixed the previous failures, it now
introduced

FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120881-1a.c  at line 4 (test for warnings, line )
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr120881-1b.c  at line 4 (test for warnings, line )

On Solaris/x86.

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits  ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :

https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44680038685d3747e7cef45abdcf8192bfcb5bb2

commit r16-2304-g44680038685d3747e7cef45abdcf8192bfcb5bb2
Author: H.J. Lu 
Date:   Tue Jul 15 22:49:12 2025 -0700

x86: Warn -pg without -mfentry only on glibc targets

Since only glibc targets support -mfentry, warn -pg without -mfentry only
on glibc targets.

gcc/

PR target/120881
PR testsuite/121078
* config/i386/i386-options.cc (ix86_option_override_internal):
Warn -pg without -mfentry only on glibc targets.

gcc/testsuite/

PR target/120881
PR testsuite/121078
* gcc.dg/20021014-1.c (dg-additional-options): Add -mfentry
-fno-pic only on gnu/x86 targets.
* gcc.dg/aru-2.c (dg-additional-options): Likewise.
* gcc.dg/nest.c (dg-additional-options): Likewise.
* gcc.dg/pr32450.c (dg-additional-options): Likewise.
* gcc.dg/pr43643.c (dg-additional-options): Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr104447.c (dg-additional-options): Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr113122-3.c(dg-additional-options): Likewise.
* gcc.target/i386/pr119386-1.c (dg-additional-options): Add
-mfentry only on gnu targets.
* gcc.target/i386/pr119386-2.c (dg-additional-options): Likewise.

Signed-off-by: H.J. Lu 

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu  ---
(In reply to [email protected] from comment #2)
> > --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu  ---
> > Please try
> >
> > https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=49715
> 
> Unfortunately, the tests still FAIL, trading one failure mode for
> another:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.dg/nest.c (test for excess errors)
> Excess errors:
> cc1: warning: '-pg' without '-mfentry' may be unreliable with shrink wrapping

Please try:

https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=49739

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-16 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE  ---
> --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu  ---
> Please try
>
> https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=49715

Unfortunately, the tests still FAIL, trading one failure mode for
another:

FAIL: gcc.dg/nest.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
cc1: warning: '-pg' without '-mfentry' may be unreliable with shrink wrapping

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

H.J. Lu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

H.J. Lu  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org  |hjl.tools at gmail dot 
com
   Last reconfirmed||2025-07-16

--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu  ---
Please try

https://patchwork.sourceware.org/project/gcc/list/?series=49715

[Bug testsuite/121078] [16 regression] gcc.dg/aru-2.c etc. FAIL

2025-07-15 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121078

Rainer Orth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |16.0