[Bug tree-optimization/121405] [13/14/15 Regression] Another missed VN via a copy (but via an int copy)

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121405

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot 
gnu.org

--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener  ---
Not considering a backport.  Keeping open for tracking purposes.

[Bug tree-optimization/121405] [13/14/15 Regression] Another missed VN via a copy (but via an int copy)

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121405

--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski  ---
This definitely helped highway. I still see some extra BIT_FIELD_REF but I am
not 100% sure as I forgot to turn on uid on the dump so I don't know which
variable is being assigned to which one. If I can get another testcase I will
file it seperately.

[Bug tree-optimization/121405] [13/14/15 Regression] Another missed VN via a copy (but via an int copy)

[rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121405

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression]
   |Another missed VN via a |Another missed VN via a
   |copy (but via an int copy)  |copy (but via an int copy)
  Known to work||16.0

--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener  ---
Fixed on trunk.