On Tue, 20 May 2014, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >>> If it's not broken in 4.8.2 but broken on the branch head then it's OK
> >>> for the branch.
> >>
> >> I thought I'd double-check with you that it is fine to push this change
> >> to trunk first. OK to apply?
> >
> > Of course it should go to
On 20/05/14 08:57, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
>> Ian,
>>
>> On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>>> On May 17, 2014 12:22:23 AM CEST, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
>>> wrote:
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> 2014-05-16 Mac
On Tue, 20 May 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> Ian,
>
> On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> > On May 17, 2014 12:22:23 AM CEST, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> > wrote:
> > >On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > >
> > >> > 2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki
> > >> >
> > >> >P
Ian,
On Sat, 17 May 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> On May 17, 2014 12:22:23 AM CEST, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
> wrote:
> >On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> >
> >> > 2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki
> >> >
> >> > PR libgcc/60166
> >> > * sysdeps/arm/soft-fp/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_S,
On May 17, 2014 12:22:23 AM CEST, "Maciej W. Rozycki"
wrote:
>On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
>> > 2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki
>> >
>> >PR libgcc/60166
>> >* sysdeps/arm/soft-fp/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_S, _FP_NANFRAC_D)
>> >(_FP_NANSIGN_Q): Set the quiet bit.
>>
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > 2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki
> >
> > PR libgcc/60166
> > * sysdeps/arm/soft-fp/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_S, _FP_NANFRAC_D)
> > (_FP_NANSIGN_Q): Set the quiet bit.
>
> OK for glibc.
Joseph, thanks for your review, this is now in.
On Fri, 16 May 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> 2014-05-16 Maciej W. Rozycki
>
> PR libgcc/60166
> * sysdeps/arm/soft-fp/sfp-machine.h (_FP_NANFRAC_S, _FP_NANFRAC_D)
> (_FP_NANSIGN_Q): Set the quiet bit.
OK for glibc.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, Joey Ye wrote:
> Current ARM soft-float implementation is violating the RTABI
> (http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ihi0043d/IHI0043D_rtabi.pd
> f) Section 4.1.1.1:
>
> When not otherwise specified by IEEE 754, the result on an invalid operation
> should be the