[gdal-dev] Simple features/sql-mm and bezier/elliptical curves

2021-10-11 Thread Nyall Dawson
Hi list, Slightly off-topic question (but I figure the people who would know would be subscribed to this list): Is anyone aware if there's been **any** talk/movement toward formally introducing bezier and/or elliptical curve support into the SF/SQL/MM specifications? Has anyone come across any in

Re: [gdal-dev] Custom vertical transformations

2021-10-11 Thread Even Rouault
Kristian, https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/4639 will allow you to use an arbitrary pipeline to do a vertical transformation through gdalwarp Even Le 23/08/2021 à 10:50, Kristian Evers a écrit : Thanks for your insights, Even! I had a feeling I was pushing the boundaries here, good to get

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake

2021-10-11 Thread Kurt Schwehr
+1 KurtS On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:15 AM Howard Butler wrote: > All, > > Discussion on this topic has died down, and it appears there are no major > objections, so I would like to put forward a motion to approve RFC 84. With > a conservative timeline, the final outcome of this effort is GDAL wil

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake

2021-10-11 Thread Jeff McKenna
+1 Will test on Windows systems. -jeff On 2021-10-11 11:14 a.m., Howard Butler wrote: All, Discussion on this topic has died down, and it appears there are no major objections, so I would like to put forward a motion to approve RFC 84. With a conservative timeline, the final outcome of th

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake

2021-10-11 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Howard Butler Lähetetty: maanantai 11. lokakuuta 2021 17.14 Vastaanottaja: gdal dev Aihe: [gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake All, Discussion on this topic has died down, and it appears ther

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake

2021-10-11 Thread Mateusz Loskot
+1 Mateusz Great stuff! It's been a dream for long to pull the CMake for GDAL off. On Mon, 11 Oct 2021 at 16:14, Howard Butler wrote: > > All, > > Discussion on this topic has died down, and it appears there are no major > objections, so I would like to put forward a motion to approve RFC 84.

Re: [gdal-dev] Use gdalwarp to convert DTM from EGM96 geoid to WGS84 ellipsoid height

2021-10-11 Thread Even Rouault
Known issue. See https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/issues/4566#issuecomment-930393920 Le 11/10/2021 à 16:23, Daniel Jacobs a écrit : I want to convert my DTM geotiff file from height above geoid to height above ellipsoid. I've tried the following command (among numerous similar commands): gd

[gdal-dev] Use gdalwarp to convert DTM from EGM96 geoid to WGS84 ellipsoid height

2021-10-11 Thread Daniel Jacobs
I want to convert my DTM geotiff file from height above geoid to height above ellipsoid. I've tried the following command (among numerous similar commands): gdalwarp -overwrite in_dem.tif out_dem.tif -s_srs EPSG:4326+5773 -t_srs EPSG:4979 I have files egm96_15.gtx​ and us_nga_egma96_15.ti

[gdal-dev] Motion: RFC 84: Migrating build systems to CMake

2021-10-11 Thread Howard Butler
All, Discussion on this topic has died down, and it appears there are no major objections, so I would like to put forward a motion to approve RFC 84. With a conservative timeline, the final outcome of this effort is GDAL will be CMake-only in May 2023. You can view the proposal at https://git

Re: [gdal-dev] FEATURE_SERVER_PAGING open option doesn't work for ESRI FeatureServer

2021-10-11 Thread Next Stop
I’ve found this bug when fetching from AGS 10.6 version. Sorry, I wasn’t aware that URL is outdated, I wrote it just as an example. > On 11 Oct 2021, at 15:45, Even Rouault wrote: > > This service doesn't seem to support paging indeed (funny that a sample > server for a service isn't up-to-date

Re: [gdal-dev] FEATURE_SERVER_PAGING open option doesn't work for ESRI FeatureServer

2021-10-11 Thread Even Rouault
This service doesn't seem to support paging indeed (funny that a sample server for a service isn't up-to-date...). I've just updated the doc. Googling around for "supportsPagination true", I could find a few public services that do work w.r.t paging Le 11/10/2021 à 14:30, Rahkonen Jukka (MML)

Re: [gdal-dev] FEATURE_SERVER_PAGING open option doesn't work for ESRI FeatureServer

2021-10-11 Thread Rahkonen Jukka (MML)
Hi, Do you know if that sampleserver3.arcgisonline.com supports paging? I thought that this query would return one feature but it returns more http://sampleserver3.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/Hydrography/Watershed173811/FeatureServer/0/query?where=objectid+%3D+objectid&outfields=*&f=js

[gdal-dev] FEATURE_SERVER_PAGING open option doesn't work for ESRI FeatureServer

2021-10-11 Thread Next Stop
Hi, list! Setting FEATURE_SERVER_PAGING open option to YES doesn’t help to retrieve all features from ESRI FeatureServer source. Check this out: ogrinfo -ro -so -oo FEATURE_SERVER_PAGING=YES "http://sampleserver3.arcgisonline.com/ArcGIS/rest/services/Hydrography/Watershed173811/FeatureServer/0