[snip]
>On an unrelated note, I seem to have stopped receiving messages from
>the geda mailing list although I did nothing to unsubscribe or block
>them.
If you are using a comcast account, then I'm not surprised.
Comcast has been classifying mail from the seul machine as spam.
Sometimes i
[snip]
>Correction: The above behavior occurs after simply installing the new
>guile-1.8.1. Now I rebuilt gEDA/gaf after installing guile-1.8.1. In
>this case, after rebuildign gEDA, I get the same gnetlist failure as
>reported by Nano. There is definately a problem with guile-1.8.1.
L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Levente
> I am designing a home PoE system. I want to use those devices in
> 100Mbps networks. My question is that will my design work as it is?
> Or do I need at least two, four layers etc. I ask this because I have
> no VHF design experience.
So
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, Stuart Brorson wrote:
OK, I just downloaded and built guile-1.8.1. Gnetlist and spice-sdb
seem to work just fine on my old FC1 system with the new guile-1.8.1.
Correction: The above behavior occurs after simply installing the new
guile-1.8.1. Now I rebuilt gEDA/gaf afte
Tomaz Solc wrote:
Is anyone interested in the output produced by xev? It is a bit too long
to send to the mailing list.
If you annotate it (i.e. label the points before/after you got the
bad scroll I'll look at it.
___
geda-user mailing list
ge
Thank you for the info. However, on my FC1 box I was able to
successfully netlist after installing guile-1.8.1. Therefore, the
problem has to do with the way guile-1.8.1 has been integrated into
FC6, not a problem with guile-1.8.1 by itself.
Like I said, I'll have some time soon (but not now) t
1. Please be specific about your problem. Where do you encounter a
problem, when netlisting or when running ngspice? Please post some
output spew from the program showing the problem.
2. If you have generated it, please post your SPICE netlist.
Stuart
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, nano schultz wrot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
> I have no idea really, but you might learn something by looking at
> the event stream. Run xwininfo to determine the window ID of the
> drawing area, then run xev -ID (with the window id) to see the
> event stream.
I can't make out anything usef
On 11/11/06, Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suspect something changed in guile. The above unbound variable
suggests that guile no longer accepts fcn names like
(define spice-sdb:loop-through-files ...
But I could be wrong.
Any guile experts who can chime in here?
This is defin
On 11/12/06, Stuart Brorson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Meanwhile, I suggest that if you really need to use gEDA, then you
ditch FC6 and use an FC5 system. FWIW, every time Red Hat releases a
new Fedora Core, they manage to break gEDA in some way or another. It
takes us developers a little after
I still have problem with my schematic in fedora core 5 this time.
could anyone test my schematic with ngspice please ?
I'm using geda-spice installed at /usr/share/gEDA/models
Error: unknown subckt: xoa1 0 2 5 4 1 ua741.inc
nano
v 20061020 1
C 4 4 0 0 0 title-B.sym
C 48400 42800 1 0 0 r
http://products3.3m.com/catalog/us/en001/electronics_mfg/electronic_handling/node_T8VK9BXQ8Mbe/root_GST1T4S9TCgv/vroot_8088DWF29Kge/gvel_RQ89J1RQDXgl/theme_us_ehpd_3_0/command_AbcPageHandler/output_html
Bob Paddock wrote:
>On Sunday 12 November 2006 02:27, Steve Meier wrote:
>
>
>>To keep the b
gnetlist -g drc my_schematic.sch
gEDA/gnetlist version 20060906
gEDA/gnetlist comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; see COPYING for more details.
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain
conditions; please see the COPYING file for more details.
Remember to check th
> Has anyone tried a toaster oven yet?
Hotplate works OK for the larger parts (0201+) but I didn't
have any more 01005's to test with.
(yes, I now consider 0201's to be the "larger" parts. It's been a
long project)
Quite a few solder bridges on the ICs though, mostly because I had no
mask so I
OK, I just downloaded and built guile-1.8.1. Gnetlist and spice-sdb
seem to work just fine on my old FC1 system with the new guile-1.8.1.
Therefore, I don't know what your problem might be since it doesn't
seem to be associated with the new guile release.
At some point in the future I will build
Tomaz Solc wrote:
Do you have any idea what application would be stealing the focus? I'm
not running anything special - just the stock GNOME installation that
comes with Debian. Gschem and other tools don't seem to have any
problems with this.
I have no idea really, but you might learn somethi
On Sunday 12 November 2006 02:27, Steve Meier wrote:
> To keep the board in place... try double sticky tape.
> P.S. not my idea, I saw one engineer using it.
That may be a *BAD* idea. Pull some Scotch Tape [TM]
off of it's roll just as fast as you can, next to a Anti-Static
meter. You can peg t
What happens when you try to run one of the other .scm back ends? Please try
running the drc checker, for example.
Stuart
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006, nano schultz wrote:
from the fc6 rpm:
md5sum /usr/share/gEDA/scheme/gnet-spice-sdb.scm
0a5101cfb44c19a612a802a35e96853d /usr/share/gEDA/scheme/gnet
Hi all,
I am designing a home PoE system. I want to use those devices in 100Mbps
networks. My question is that will my design work as it is? Or do I need at
least two, four layers etc. I ask this because I have no VHF design experience.
The pcb file can be found at
http://web.interware.hu/lek
Thank you Werner. It solved the problem.
Regards
2006/11/11, Werner Hoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi Giorgenes,
On Saturday 11 November 2006 22:24, Giorgenes Gelatti wrote:
> Following the "my schematic doesn't work" series, I have another
> problem. I was doing my schematic in ubuntu dapper and n
Hi folks,
I am creating a symbol for a small heatsink. I wanted to convert it to element,
but PCB refused to do it, hence it does not contain any pis/pads. I placed a
pin, converted to element. After, I edited the element with vim, and commented
out the pin. PCB had no problem to load it after
from the fc6 rpm:
md5sum /usr/share/gEDA/scheme/gnet-spice-sdb.scm
0a5101cfb44c19a612a802a35e96853d /usr/share/gEDA/scheme/gnet-spice-sdb.scm
The gnetlist sources i've downloaded:
md5sum scheme/gnet-spice-sdb.scm
0a5101cfb44c19a612a802a35e96853d scheme/gnet-spice-sdb.scm
On 11/12/06, John Dot
Yes i did. Now I don't have any fc6 geda rpms. I've built all the
sources of geda. I'm still having it. :(
[OT]
however is it normal that packages are installed at
/usr/local/share/gEDA instead of /usr/share/gEDA ?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user
To keep the board in place... try double sticky tape.
Steve M.
P.S. not my idea, I saw one engineer using it.
Chris Emerson wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 12:20:53AM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>>Anyone get it working yet? Anyone? ;-)
>>
>
>I've started trying to put one of mine together
24 matches
Mail list logo
