Steven Michalske wrote:
At work we have two elements that we use pretty extensively for making
connections that are rarely configured.
The first element is basically a surface mount device such as a 0603
but are shorted through the middle. This is useful for filters that
might need to be
On 3/29/07, Steven Michalske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The workaround i currently use is to draw up using normal 0603 parts
and after my design meets DRC and has no shorted nets, I go through
and manually short the elements.
The dilemma here is that this is not error-proof, it also provides a
d
At work we have two elements that we use pretty extensively for
making connections that are rarely configured.
The first element is basically a surface mount device such as a 0603
but are shorted through the middle. This is useful for filters that
might need to be added later on and not ne
Alessandro Baretta wrote:
Dan McMahill wrote:
As far as multipage projects Do you mean a flat hierarchy but
with multiple pages?
I'd like to have all my project in a single file.
[jg]This sounds odd to me at first, but I like it. Why not have
a page module defined within a file so one
Dan McMahill wrote:
Alessandro Baretta wrote:
Two above all: a complete IEC symbols
library for automation and distribution systems, and support for
multipage projects.
If you were to draw the symbols, that could solve the first problem!
No, that's not an option. I work 14h a day, and I al
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:15:23 -0700, Jason Elder wrote:
My goal
here was to find one that I can download, burn, install, have the latest
version of firefox and openoffice, and then install gEDA with minimum
hassle.
With these requirements you may choose a distro that ha
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 20:15:23 -0700, Jason Elder wrote:
> My goal
> here was to find one that I can download, burn, install, have the latest
> version of firefox and openoffice, and then install gEDA with minimum
> hassle.
With these requirements you may choose a distro that has the geda tools in
Simulations and physical layouts are dangerous. If you have anything
more than schematics and you might have to demonstrate feasability and
functionality.
Steve M.
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 14:47 -0400, al davis wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2007 14:45, al davis wrote:
> > n Thursday 29 March 2007
On Thursday 29 March 2007 14:45, al davis wrote:
> n Thursday 29 March 2007 14:23, Stephen Williams wrote:
> > Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > > As from the next fedora buildsystem release (tonight):
> > > Fedora users will be having:
> > > geda-gattrib-20070216-1.fc6
> > > libgeda-20070216-1.fc6
> > >
On Thursday 29 March 2007 14:23, Stephen Williams wrote:
> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> > As from the next fedora buildsystem release (tonight):
> > Fedora users will be having:
> > geda-gattrib-20070216-1.fc6
> > libgeda-20070216-1.fc6
> > geda-gschem-20070216-1.fc6
> > libgeda-devel-20070216-1.fc6
>
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> As from the next fedora buildsystem release (tonight):
> Fedora users will be having:
> geda-gattrib-20070216-1.fc6
> libgeda-20070216-1.fc6
> geda-gschem-20070216-1.fc6
> libgeda-devel-20070216-1.fc6
> libgeda-doc-20070216-1.fc6
> geda-gsymcheck-20070216-1.fc6
> geda-symbo
I used to use SuSE 9.0 on a PII but that failed eventually. (HDD crash)
SuSE is good for starters but 9.0 wouldn't build later versions of
gEDA for some reason.
(that might have been related to the HDD problem)
I used SuSE starting on version 6.3 and stayed until 9.2.
I am currently on gentoo. I a
> My last challenge was to see if I could build lesstif hid version of
> pcb. I can't seem to find all the dependencies missing on the SuSe 10.2
> distro. Anyone have any hints?
On fedora, you need lesstif and lesstif-devel
___
geda-user mailing l
Jason Elder wrote:
.
Conclusion -
1. OpenSUSE works well, the development packs need to be installed
post-install (I opened the software installer and selected every
package that had development in the name).
2. Slackware - This distro should work well...I think that if you
choose full
Al -
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:03:06AM -0400, al davis wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2007 01:33, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Debian.
> debian unstable
Well, I use both stable and unstable, depending on the need.
> > That gets you versions:
> > geda: 20060123-1
> 20061020
Oops. You're right.
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 20:15 -0700, Jason Elder wrote:
> I'm pretty sure gEDA will work well with any distro out there. My
> goal here was to find one that I can download, burn, install, have the
> latest version of firefox and openoffice, and then install gEDA with
> minimum hassle. Also, I've be
I like Gentoo for me. I like how it manages packages
and avoids the dependency from out of date libraries.
I installed the latest redhat on a machine recently
and it felt like installing XP. It was beautiful.
That machine will probably stay with redhat, but my
kids use it for web surfing. Its not
I like Gentoo for me. I like how it manages packages
and avoids the dependency from out of date libraries.
I installed the latest redhat on a machine recently
and it felt like installing XP. It was beautiful.
That machine will probably stay with redhat, but my
kids use it for web surfing. Its not
The Gentoo install is time consuming and sometimes tricky, but the end
result beats everything I have tried. Installation of gEDA is as simple
as "emerge geda" (unless you want the nightly snapshots of course).
Gentoo has more scientific/engineering packages than anything I have
seen ; and, yo
Jason Elder wrote:
[...]
> Finally I settled on OpenSUSE 10.2 with the GNOME desktop. SUSE has older
> versions of both firefox and openoffice, but needed to make a choice so I
> settled on this one. I really like it, especially the GNOME desktop with the
> X-sumthin-or-other that adds desktop
I'm pretty sure gEDA will work well with any distro out there. My goal here
was to find
one that I can download, burn, install, have the latest version of firefox and
openoffice,
and then install gEDA with minimum hassle. Also, I've been following some of
the distros
I second Larry's and Al
On 3/29/07, al davis wrote:
Fedora: RPM packages. good beginner distro, particularly if you
have a poor net connection. Not as many packages. Enough on
CD to be useful without net.
Hello,
Actually it is not very encouraging for a fedora packager (me) or any
other "distro X" packager to see su
22 matches
Mail list logo
