On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:15 PM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> What is wrong with the existing symbols which requires you to make
> your
> own? (Consistent drawing style, errors in the shipped symbols?)
The library symbols are almost never exactly right. Missing
footprints, wrong pin numbers for the
On Feb 11, 2008, at 12:06 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some of my own symbols im my project directory have identical names as
> symbols in /usr/share/gEDA, so gschem reports
>
> "Mehr als ein Bauteil mit dem Namen [in-1.sym] gefunden"
>
> Yes, I asked the same question in October 2007:
Yes, John, that would be helpful. It would give me a second sample to try
here and see where I may be going wrong.
Thanks,
Steve
>
> Want me to create a schematic set with embedded symbols and send it to
> you for another example to follow?
> The schematic is for some free-published hardware..
Steven Taylor wrote:
> My symbol, that I created, that represents my lower level schematic has
> pins with only pin numbers, pinseq numbers, and pin labels. The pin labels
> match the refdes on the IO connectors on the underlying schematic.
OK, How about the refdes of the symbol that correspon
My symbol, that I created, that represents my lower level schematic has
pins with only pin numbers, pinseq numbers, and pin labels. The pin labels
match the refdes on the IO connectors on the underlying schematic. That is
the way it was done on the gTAG example. I tried assigning pintypes to
Continuing my checking, I have found that *all* the nets on the lower
level schematics are showing up in the net list file twice, first as
separate nets and then again as included in the proper nets with all the
pins from the lower levels combined with the top level connections. The
reason
Steve Taylor wrote:
> When I run the same command on the top level schematic, I get a long list
> of "Duplicated references for every symbol in the underlying schematic, I
> get another list for duplicate slot 1 of every symbol, and I get errors on
> three of my inputs, listing the component
Actually, I have to take that back, the nets do show up correctly
connected for all of the IOs, but the pins on the lower level schematic
also show up in the net list as nets with only a single pin. So those nets
in question are actually in the net list twice, once as single pin nets
and th
The net list comes out OK except for two of the nets which don't connect
through between the upper level and the lower level schematics.
Steve
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:09:40 -0800, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 13:07 -0800, Steve Taylor wrote:
>
>> I am evide
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 13:07 -0800, Steve Taylor wrote:
> I am evidently doing something wrong and I need some help in pointing me
> in the right direction.
It might be that the drc2 backend doesn't support this very well. Does
the netlist look OK when you netlist for the circuit layout softwar
I an a new user of gEDA and have completed one single level schematic and
am working on a second schematic. This second one has a top level page
with a lower level section repeated four times. After a lot of reading on
the web, looking at the examples, and experimentation, I have created the
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:15:14 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>What is wrong with the existing symbols which requires you to make
>your own? (Consistent drawing style, errors in the shipped symbols?)
Most gEDA symbols are fine, I have replaced only a few for my projects:
- some original gEDA symbols
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 19:15:14 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> What is wrong with the existing symbols which requires you to make your
> own? (Consistent drawing style, errors in the shipped symbols?)
The one reason, that drove me to do my own versions: Shipped symbols have
no default footprints att
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 20:06 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Hello,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gEDA/DAD $ cat gafrc
> (component-library "../gschem-sym")
> (component-library "../imported-symbols")
>
> My symbols with identical names are in "../gschem-sym", and
> it seems that gschem gives my own sym
Hello,
some of my own symbols im my project directory have identical names as
symbols in /usr/share/gEDA, so gschem reports
"Mehr als ein Bauteil mit dem Namen [in-1.sym] gefunden"
Yes, I asked the same question in October 2007:
http://archives.seul.org/geda/user/Oct-2007/msg00165.html
I am s
> Since the distros separate tools like gschem and gattrib, you would then
> need three packages (libgeda, gattrib, gschem), otherwise:
>
> apt-get geda-gschem
>
> pulling in "geda-desktop-stuff" would cause you to have gattrib (and
> potentially other) icons for programs not installed.
>
>
> P
Hi Ales,
Thank you very much for the info, it clarifies fully about gEDA's RFCs
policy.
I fully respect your view and judgement on that.
I did not read Peter C's previous message "gEDA-dev: Spice SDB slotting
fix".
and unfortunately I did not realize it would have something in it that
would af
17 matches
Mail list logo
