I like a hierarchical schematic where I have a top.sch which has symbols
for each of the major subsections and I use buses for most digital
signal paths and nets for the analog paths to interconnect these
symbols.
When you have designs with a thousand components on it I don't care how
small your s
On Oct 29, 2008, at 4:22 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:33 PM, John Doty wrote:
> Should I adjust the size of the symbols or the size of title-
> B.sym?
> What is the correct way and how do I do that?
I would adjust the size of the symbols. The standard sym
On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:33 PM, John Doty wrote:
Should I adjust the size of the symbols or the size of title-B.sym?
What is the correct way and how do I do that?
>>>
>>> I would adjust the size of the symbols. The standard symbols seem a
>>> bit too big
>>> for me as well.
>>
> That's not t
I went looking to see if the Analog Device book was available
electronically. Here are the links.
Steve Meier
High Speed System Applications Table of Contents
High Speed System Applications Section 1: High Speed Data Conversion
Overview
High Speed System Applications Section 2: Optimizing
> I personally find title-B about right for letter or A4 paper with the
> existing symbols.
I have a set of my own titleblocks that are multiples of letter size,
designed for "extents without margins" prints.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mor
On Oct 29, 2008, at 3:04 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:02 PM, John Luciani wrote:
>>> Should I adjust the size of the symbols or the size of title-B.sym?
>>> What is the correct way and how do I do that?
>>
>> I would adjust the size of the symbols. The standard symbols seem a
>
> I have created some symbols with the djboxsym tool and everything
> seems fine except that when I add the symbols to a schematic their
> size relative the title-B.sym is way too big.
Sometimes, grouping pins into busses in djboxsym helps (don't put
blank lines between them, and put ".bus" on a
On Oct 29, 2008, at 5:02 PM, John Luciani wrote:
>> Should I adjust the size of the symbols or the size of title-B.sym?
>> What is the correct way and how do I do that?
>
> I would adjust the size of the symbols. The standard symbols seem a
> bit too big
> for me as well.
Same here. Is there
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Peter Carlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should I adjust the size of the symbols or the size of title-B.sym?
> What is the correct way and how do I do that?
I would adjust the size of the symbols. The standard symbols seem a bit too big
for me as well.
(* jcl
On Wednesday 29 October 2008 20:56:34 Peter Carlsson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I have created some symbols with the djboxsym tool and everything
> seems fine except that when I add the symbols to a schematic their
> size relative the title-B.sym is way too big.
>
> Should I adjust the size of the symbols
Hello!
I have created some symbols with the djboxsym tool and everything
seems fine except that when I add the symbols to a schematic their
size relative the title-B.sym is way too big.
Should I adjust the size of the symbols or the size of title-B.sym?
What is the correct way and how do I do tha
> But can you talk to it with Linux?
I don't, but I think you can. There's an SDK and emulator from the
timex yahoo group folks.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> I have one I use every day, but it's in my watch.
>> So that watch isn't on a wrist band it is on an adjustable crane hook.
>
> Heh, I suppose.
>
> FYI it's a Timex Ironman USB. Very useful watch.
But can you talk to it with Linux?
Eric (who still uses a VR3 - mostly to
> > I have one I use every day, but it's in my watch.
>
> So that watch isn't on a wrist band it is on an adjustable crane hook.
Heh, I suppose.
FYI it's a Timex Ironman USB. Very useful watch.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
h
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 20:47 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Joerg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > By now I'd say "Prehistoric Digital Assistant". The only guy I know
> > who actually still uses one is our pastor.
>
> I have one I use every day, but it's in my watch.
>
So that watch isn't on a wrist b
> I used to have the compoment layer, but since it was empty I just
> deleted it. Now in the layers' group window I have solder and ground
> on group one (solder side), and nothing on group two (component
> side).
It's usually better to leave the component layer there, but just
disable (not delet
Hello guys,
I've finished a board I've been working on, though I have a question about
both, it's proper setup and output.
Since I'm doing a one side board, I've just left the solder layer (where my
routes live), and the ground layer, which is where I have the ground plane,
both of them on the
17 matches
Mail list logo
