On Saturday 17 January 2009 01:24:52 r wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Peter TB Brett
wrote:
> > Currently, Scheme is the only available extension language for
> > gEDA. However, in future it may be desirable to extend gEDA apps in
> > other languages, including possibly as native code
On Saturday 17 January 2009 02:43:44 Steve Meier wrote:
> hmmm, isn't problem info being logged. I would agree if during the
> current run the logfile only included warnings.
99+% of the time, the log doesn't contain anything other than a
copywrite/no-warranty notice and a list of files loaded.
On Friday 16 January 2009 23:22:11 DJ Delorie wrote:
> It would be really cool if you could cut/copy in gschem, and paste in
> *pcb*, and have the right footprint show up.
Let's assume that, for now, we're just going to implement copying and pasting
of schematic data.
> Frankly, I'm more than happy to remove local log files in the clean
> targets of my per-project makefiles.
Normally, me too, but it puts them in the symbol directories if you
edit a symbol, and any script that uses gschem to print a schematic
leaves one behind, etc. They're messy.
__
> or will pcb support ASIC layouts in the future?
I don't expect so, but I don't see how that relates to what gschem is.
> Furthermore, we want gschem to be a front-end for simulation
> systems.
I'll lump "simulator" in with other "layout systems" then. If I had a
word that meant "all those
John,
So until this AI exists the cut and paste interface should allow an
application to state "Not Supported" but one application shouldn't limit
what other applications can do. Something about graceful degradation.
Steve Meier
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 21:41 -0700, John Doty wrote:
> On Jan 16, 20
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 21:37 -0700, John Doty wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
>
> > To me the idea of a app.log associated with a project is that if some
> > step in the project goes "GAK" I would like to know why.
> >
>
> The basic problem is that the software's point of
John,
So for you an application setting of only use syslog. For me I like a
text file in the directory that my project is in. One that says, hey I
didn't run to completion and here is where I stopped failing that the
last thing that the developers thought to write out and wasn't wiped out
by a mu
On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:34 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
> For a simulator, wouldn't you want to select a section of a schematic
> and say simulate this?
I'd love it, but that's beyond the state of the art for AI. In
practice, simulation requires a lot of thought in the design of the
"test fixture".
On Jan 16, 2009, at 9:09 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
> To me the idea of a app.log associated with a project is that if some
> step in the project goes "GAK" I would like to know why.
>
The basic problem is that the software's point of view is not the
user's. Software is even better than priests at
John,
For a simulator, wouldn't you want to select a section of a schematic
and say simulate this?
I think, thinking about scenarios leads to requirements. So to say be
able to select an area of a schematic and then transmute that schematic
section into the needs of the next application.
If the
On Jan 16, 2009, at 8:48 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>>> A program should do one thing well. Capturing circuit information
>>> (regardless of what that is) and providing that to a layout system
>>> (regardless of what *that* is) is that one thing here.
>>
>> As stated by you, that's two things.
>
>
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Except that I *don't* drain it - that's the best part of CuCl is that
> it's air regenerated, there's NO waste at all. The copper in solution
> came from other boards I'd etched (you start with an HCl/H2O2 etchant
> and slowly convert it).
Right. If you do enough CuCl etchi
To me the idea of a app.log associated with a project is that if some
step in the project goes "GAK" I would like to know why.
For example I modified an altera project and built it and in doing
so generated a fubar.ptf file which I then put onto a memory stick and
moved fubar.ptf from a windo$
My mental picture was that if I select a block from gschem and paste it
into pcb that the correct land patterns and the netlist between pins of
those land patterns should "walla" "appear" in pcb.
This is of course "futuristic"! But shouldn't the design of a cut and
paste operation be forward looki
> > A program should do one thing well. Capturing circuit information
> > (regardless of what that is) and providing that to a layout system
> > (regardless of what *that* is) is that one thing here.
>
> As stated by you, that's two things.
Sigh. I'll try to word it as one thing. "Be a design
On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:52 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> "A program should do one thing well". Netlisting and layout are not
>> the charter of a schematic capture program.
>
> But 90% of the common users expect "obvious" things to work. Cutting
> and pasting between applications should "just work".
On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:43 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
> hmmm, isn't problem info being logged. I would agree if during the
> current run the logfile only included warnings.
>
> how about if at the end of execution that if there was a problem of
> some
> class detected that the user be asked if the l
> "A program should do one thing well". Netlisting and layout are not
> the charter of a schematic capture program.
But 90% of the common users expect "obvious" things to work. Cutting
and pasting between applications should "just work". The gEDA+pcb
flow should "just work". Yes, there will be
On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
> footprint and netlist
gschem (correctly IMNSHO) doesn't even know what these are, as they
depend on which flow you're using.
"A program should do one thing well". Netlisting and layout are not
the charter of a schematic capture program.
hmmm, isn't problem info being logged. I would agree if during the
current run the logfile only included warnings.
how about if at the end of execution that if there was a problem of some
class detected that the user be asked if the log file should be
retained?
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:32 -0500,
Ales surprised me at the code sprint by calling me a "heavy symbol"
advocate. Let me try to make clear my real position.
The question is not "light" versus "heavy", but where to put the
"mass" so it doesn't become a burden, especially for design reuse.
The more I use gEDA, the more this is a
footprint and netlist
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:22 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> It would be really cool if you could cut/copy in gschem, and paste in
> *pcb*, and have the right footprint show up.
>
>
> ___
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@moria.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> Currently, Scheme is the only available extension language for
> gEDA. However, in future it may be desirable to extend gEDA apps in
> other languages, including possibly as native code loaded from .so
> files.
Extending gEDA with native
On Jan 16, 2009, at 5:25 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Saturday 17 January 2009 00:15:46 Steven Michalske wrote:
>> KISS says
>>
>> key = value \n
>> next key = its value \n
>>
>> anything can parse this simple format
>>
>> an unknown key is a warning,
>
> I don't see how this is any different f
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 11:04 -0500, Rob Butts wrote:
> Is it pretty much just following the pictures or is there some trick I
>should know?
>
Just follow the pictures, though DJ luck is much better than mine. I
have a laminator, etching tank and 4 litre bottle of enchant that I've
been trying
On Saturday 17 January 2009 00:10:54 al davis wrote:
> Should plugins use the ".so" extension, (or is that ".dll) which
> is system dependent, or should they use another extension that
> is application specific but consistent across systems?
Everyone is fixating on link-library plugins, but don't
On Saturday 17 January 2009 00:15:46 Steven Michalske wrote:
> KISS says
>
> key = value \n
> next key = its value \n
>
> anything can parse this simple format
>
> an unknown key is a warning,
I don't see how this is any different from:
(key value)
Except that in the case of using a Scheme-like
On Saturday 17 January 2009 00:08:17 r wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Peter TB Brett
wrote:
> > Currently, the gEDA configuration files are executed by a Scheme
> > interpreter. This has a number of flaws:
> >
> > 1. An error in a configuration file will cause it not to be fully
> >
KISS says
key = value \n
next key = its value \n
anything can parse this simple format
an unknown key is a warning,
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:44 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> Currently, the gEDA configuration files are executed by a Scheme
> interpreter. This has a number of flaws:
>
> 1. An erro
> It is my impression that the PCB plugin system is almost the same,
> except that the "well-known function" is used instead of static
> constructors.
I originally did it with constructors, but to do it in C required a
gcc extension. So I changed it.
> Should plugins use the ".so" extension, (o
I SECOND this one, and THIRD it if I could!
On Jan 16, 2009, at 2:45 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> Currently, running any gEDA suite program leaves behind a log file in
> the current working directory. I would like to change the default to
> not
> generating log files, so that I (and other user
On Friday 16 January 2009, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 23:21:19 DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Better would be to have the plugin itself have some
> > well-known function that registers itself, like pcb's
> > plugins do. Thus, all you really have to do is dl_open()
> > any .so's you f
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> Currently, the gEDA configuration files are executed by a Scheme
> interpreter. This has a number of flaws:
>
> 1. An error in a configuration file will cause it not to be fully
> interpreted. This can potentially leave gEDA application
John Doty wrote:
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
>> Oh, the strange things one can achieve with gEDA!
>
> Yep. The difference between user software and consumer software.
>
You can do a lot more with "consumer software" than you might think.
Last month I drew a telco-sty
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:50 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Most apps just pre-load any available plugins, though.
Loading them is one thing, but enabling is completely another.
I think they should automatically be enumerated when they are found,
queried for text / description / a graphic even? to pr
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:35 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Having been stung by this in the past, I would prefer the majority
> > of plugins to be "opt-in" than "opt-out" (i.e. loaded only when the
> > current project needs to use them).
>
> The counter-sting is trying to automatically install N plu
> Sure. Any ideas how to get the best of both worlds?
Another option is to include a blacklist in your personal config, so
that the default is "load all" but you can explicitly deny those that
are problematic, without (1) having to list all other plugins
somewhere, or (2) having to uninstall a po
> Sure. Any ideas how to get the best of both worlds?
If the problem is to avoid loading the wrong plugins, there
are some options:
1. separate subdirs for each plugin type
2. the well-known function name can differ from app to app
3. let the user choose which ones to put in the subdir like ev
On Friday 16 January 2009 23:35:22 DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Having been stung by this in the past, I would prefer the majority
> > of plugins to be "opt-in" than "opt-out" (i.e. loaded only when the
> > current project needs to use them).
>
> The counter-sting is trying to automatically install N plug
> Having been stung by this in the past, I would prefer the majority
> of plugins to be "opt-in" than "opt-out" (i.e. loaded only when the
> current project needs to use them).
The counter-sting is trying to automatically install N plugins, each
of which has to be listed in a single config file.
On Fri, January 16, 2009 5:45 pm, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Currently, running any gEDA suite program leaves behind a log file in
> the current working directory. I would like to change the default to not
> generating log files, so that I (and other users who use the default
> configuration) don't en
On Jan 16, 2009, at 4:15 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2009 23:11:18 John Doty wrote:
>
>>> Will anyone miss it enormously if it is
>>> removed?
>>
>> Well, I sometimes use it when doing cut/paste between pages. Not too
>> often. Won't blight my life if it goes away.
>>
>>> If
On Friday 16 January 2009 23:21:19 DJ Delorie wrote:
> Better would be to have the plugin itself have some well-known
> function that registers itself, like pcb's plugins do. Thus, all you
> really have to do is dl_open() any .so's you find, and call their
> well-known function.
Having been stung
It would be really cool if you could cut/copy in gschem, and paste in
*pcb*, and have the right footprint show up.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Better would be to have the plugin itself have some well-known
function that registers itself, like pcb's plugins do. Thus, all you
really have to do is dl_open() any .so's you find, and call their
well-known function.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Oh, the strange things one can achieve with gEDA!
Yep. The difference between user software and consumer software.
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
j...@noqsi.com
_
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> Currently, if you 'copy' in gschem and 'paste' in another program,
> nothing useful happens. We should ideally try and use the X
> clipboard.
>
> I propose that we enable (in the following order):
>
> 1. Copy in gschem, paste in text editor.
On Friday 16 January 2009 23:11:18 John Doty wrote:
> > Will anyone miss it enormously if it is
> > removed?
>
> Well, I sometimes use it when doing cut/paste between pages. Not too
> often. Won't blight my life if it goes away.
>
> > If it shouldn't be removed, could it be sufficiently replaced
>
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> The "New window" functiona in gschem is getting in my way (for a
> variety
> of rather technical reasons that I can go into if someone really wants
> me to). [*]
>
> Does anyone actually use this?
Yes.
> Will anyone miss it enormously if
This is an excellent idea.
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>
> Currently, the gEDA configuration files are executed by a Scheme
> interpreter. This has a number of flaws:
>
> 1. An error in a configuration file will cause it not to be fully
>interpreted. This can potentiall
I needed a Gantt chart for a project report, so I drew one in gschem.
gantt.sch
Description: Gantt chart
Oh, the strange things one can achieve with gEDA! (BTW, Cairo gschem
looks & feels amazing, and Peter C. deserves donations towards his
secret evil mastermind laboratory/bunker).
Currently, running any gEDA suite program leaves behind a log file in
the current working directory. I would like to change the default to not
generating log files, so that I (and other users who use the default
configuration) don't end up with gschem.log and gnetlist.log files
scattered over thei
Currently, if you 'copy' in gschem and 'paste' in another program,
nothing useful happens. We should ideally try and use the X
clipboard.
I propose that we enable (in the following order):
1. Copy in gschem, paste in text editor. Should it paste schematic file
source code equivalent to copied
The "New window" functiona in gschem is getting in my way (for a variety
of rather technical reasons that I can go into if someone really wants
me to). [*]
Does anyone actually use this? Will anyone miss it enormously if it is
removed? If it shouldn't be removed, could it be sufficiently replaced
gEDA currently allows symbols or pictures to be embedded in a
schematic. However, the current embedding system requires the full
data to be embedded for each instance of an embedded item.
This has a number of shortcomings:
1. It bloats filesize by requiring multiple redundant copies of the same
Currently, Scheme is the only available extension language for
gEDA. However, in future it may be desirable to extend gEDA apps in
other languages, including possibly as native code loaded from .so
files.
Furthermore, if configuration files are no longer executable (see
previous e-mail), some mec
Currently, the gEDA configuration files are executed by a Scheme
interpreter. This has a number of flaws:
1. An error in a configuration file will cause it not to be fully
interpreted. This can potentially leave gEDA applications in an
unusable state or even cause it not to start at all. Fu
Hi all,
I have a few mostly-unrelated proposals that I hoped people might to
hear about. These might be suitable for implementation in the 1.7
development series.
1. Non-Turing-complete configuration files.
2. Plugin system.
3. Embedding system revamp.
4. "New window" functionality.
5.
On Jan 16, 2009, at 3:00 PM, der Mouse wrote:
The generalist will be at a disadvantage when faced with a task
that pushes state of the art for a specific field.
>> Absolutely not. The generalist has a huge advantage, because at the
>> cutting edge there is no "specific field", only a p
I think this discussion has gone on for long enough without input from
the core developers. As one of them, I add this, hoping to appease
both sides and not scare away any potential users/contributors...
gEDA/PCB should be flexible for those who need flexibility, and easy
to use for those who ne
On Friday 16 January 2009, Steven Michalske wrote:
>it's called the knack.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmYDgncMhXw
>
>:-)
>
Chuckle, I was wondering when somebody would make a video out of that classic.
Thanks for the link, bookmarked for future use. :)
>On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:50 PM, S
>>> The generalist will be at a disadvantage when faced with a task
>>> that pushes state of the art for a specific field.
> Absolutely not. The generalist has a huge advantage, because at the
> cutting edge there is no "specific field", only a problem to be
> solved. To truly push the state of t
On Jan 16, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Joerg wrote:
> Steve Meier wrote:
>> Do either of you think that one size shoe should fit all peoples
>> feet?
>>
>
> No, but it seems this thread shows two different sizes. The rest would
> mostly be in between :-)
gEDA belongs to the software user's tradition, no
Am Freitag, den 16.01.2009, 19:56 +0100 schrieb Oliver Lehmann:
>
> yeah - you are completly right - the PS files are fine - its a
> autorotation problem of ps2pdf (respectively ghostscript) - sorry that
> I've not understood you in the first place or having seen this by my
> self...
>
If you ar
Levente Kovacs wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:44:24 -0800
> Joerg
> wrote:
>
>> Levente Kovacs wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:12:07 -0800
>>> Joerg
>>> wrote:
>>>
Levente Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My temperature sensor/logger finaly works!
>
> http://logonex.eu/tc/
>>>
Steve Meier wrote:
> Do either of you think that one size shoe should fit all peoples feet?
>
No, but it seems this thread shows two different sizes. The rest would
mostly be in between :-)
> The market place of jobs will have opportunities for specialists and for
> generalists and for ranges
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Then there was the day I had to explain to my son, that he was allowed
> to take apart his toys, but not the house...
>
My parents forgot to tell me that last part. Found pa's hammer and
chisel. There's got to be electricity down under that plaster there.
Found it. Peeled it
Looks like page 13 has lots of rotated text. that probably
confused the auto rotator.
:-)
On Jan 16, 2009, at 11:21 AM, Oliver Lehmann wrote:
> Steven Michalske wrote:
>
>> -dAutoRotatePages=/None
>
> I used -dAutoRotatePages=/All now
>
> It looks like /All worked because then ps2pdf dete
Steven Michalske wrote:
> -dAutoRotatePages=/None
I used -dAutoRotatePages=/All now
It looks like /All worked because then ps2pdf detects the orientation
only once and then rotates all the pages to the same orientation? This is
what I'm guessing. And because my 1st page is rotated well the affec
Then there was the day I had to explain to my son, that he was allowed
to take apart his toys, but not the house...
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
When I was 4 my parents gave me a real screwdriver set for
Christmas.
I took apart the telephone in the basement 2 or three times before
they found out I was taking it apart and putting it back together.
They only found out that I was taking it apart, when i decided to use
dad's wire cu
it should be this option
-dAutoRotatePages=/None
On Jan 16, 2009, at 11:00 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
I'm not sure how to "fix" the ps2pdf step, but the latest acroread
knows how to auto-rotate pages to fit the printed paper. I suspect
ps2pdf looks for which way text is oriented... pcb d
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 1:00 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> I'm not sure how to "fix" the ps2pdf step, but the latest acroread
> knows how to auto-rotate pages to fit the printed paper. I suspect
> ps2pdf looks for which way text is oriented... pcb doesn't have this
> problem, but it always prints som
The auto rotate tries to use the orientation of text the most of the
test on the page, auto rotate may want to be turned off for your runs
I have hit this problem with postscripts files before, so i usually
force the pages to landscape in ps2pdf
here are some tips. i also hit similar pr
I'm not sure how to "fix" the ps2pdf step, but the latest acroread
knows how to auto-rotate pages to fit the printed paper. I suspect
ps2pdf looks for which way text is oriented... pcb doesn't have this
problem, but it always prints something at the bottom of each page.
> it's called the knack.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmYDgncMhXw
Yup, that's me, although my social skills have improved over the
years.
My mom tells this story about when I was a little tike... We had two
TVs in the house, one working, one broken. One night she heard noises
downst
DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> "Oliver Lehmann" writes:
> > Have you tried my two uploaded examples?
>
> Both render in landscape for me, in the PS files. One is auto-rotated
> by ps2pdf, but for both, the print is properly rotated with respect to
> the page it's rendered on.
yeah - you are completly
it's called the knack.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CmYDgncMhXw
:-)
On Jan 15, 2009, at 8:50 PM, Steve Meier wrote:
> or in DJ's case I
> think he just can't help but be creative
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.
Ah, switching to loading the new scheme file works.
However, the print doesn't match the schematics...
http://www.delorie.com/electronics/powermeter/
Compare powermeter.pdf to channel.sch... (channel.ps in my build dir
matches the pdf):
R10, R11, R12, R14, R15 values are not printed. Other re
On Friday 16 January 2009 17:56:56 Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:31 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Executing guile script [./print.scm]
> >
> > In unknown file:
> >?: 0* [primitive-load "/envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg"]
> > In /envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg:
>
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 06:42 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 23:32:50 -0600, Kipton Moravec wrote:
>
> > It looks like if the part already has a number, neither renumber program
> > touches it. That is good in most cases, but not in my case. Is there a
> > secret way to force a
On Friday 16 January 2009 13:09:00 Peter Clifton wrote:
> > When started gschem presents a GUI with a black background, although my
> > local gsemrc configures a light background with the line
> > (load (build-path geda-rc-path "gschem-lightbg"))
>
> The new colour map syntax Peter B introduced
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:31 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Executing guile script [./print.scm]
>
> In unknown file:
>?: 0* [primitive-load "/envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg"]
> In /envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg:
> 60: 1* (background-color 0 "grey94" "null" "1 1 1")
>
> /envy/dj
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:30 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > Not digital, but this is similar to a load circuit I built in the lab.
>
> Yeah, something like that.
>
> Kudos to email-able schematics :-)
>
> > The actual circuit ended up with most of RLoad in the emitters of
> > the FETs to ensure bet
> That tin plate solution is really old or you didn't clean the board
> right ...
I just forgot to rinse it after plating, that's all. It works fine
all the other times.
> And worst is that old thing CuCl, you are buying copper to etch copper
> and drain twice the copper way.
Except that I
DJ Delorie wrote:
> My technique, as shown, is not really much different than what is
> documented online. You can read pretty much any toner-transfer
> description and follow along with my photos.
>
> Note, however, that I've switched to using photofilm and CuCl etchant,
> so I don't actually use
Executing guile script [./print.scm]
In unknown file:
?: 0* [primitive-load "/envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg"]
In /envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg:
60: 1* (background-color 0 "grey94" "null" "1 1 1")
/envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg:59:0: Unbound variable: background-c
> Not digital, but this is similar to a load circuit I built in the lab.
Yeah, something like that.
Kudos to email-able schematics :-)
> The actual circuit ended up with most of RLoad in the emitters of
> the FETs to ensure better balancing.
Did your FETs have positive or negative thermal coef
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 01:11 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> I run this command:
>
> gschem -p -o ethernet.ps -s ./print.scm ethernet.sch
>
> with this script:
[snip]
> ; light background
> (load "/envy/dj/geda/share/gEDA/gschem-lightbg")
Syntax for that has changed in git HEAD since the last releas
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:44:24 -0800
Joerg
wrote:
> Levente Kovacs wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:12:07 -0800
> > Joerg
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Levente Kovacs wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> My temperature sensor/logger finaly works!
> >>>
> >>> http://logonex.eu/tc/
> >>>
> >>> Red: The temperature
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 16:21 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > But just to make sure that it doesn't ride "on the edge" at least
> > I'd try some rapid load changes.
>
> Good idea. Hey - a flashlight bulb makes a handy 0.9A 5V load! Nope,
> no problems, and pretty good regulation.
>
> One of these da
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 08:59 +0530, Ramakrishnan Muthukrishnan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a gschem symbol for an Opamp IC. One of the pins
> on that IC is usually unconnected, so I didn't have a pin for it in
> the gschem symbol. But I get a warning from gsymcheck saying tha the
> numbe
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 16:57 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:09:00 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> > The new colour map syntax Peter B introduced after 1.5.1 requires a
> > different line:
> >
> > (load (build-path geda-rc-path "gschem-colormap-lightbg")) ; light
> > backgr
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 13:18 +, gdedwa...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> > I'd very much appreciate if someone else (it worked for me) could test
> > if adding "AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL" before the "AM_PROG_LIBTOOL" line works
> > without damaging the Linux / Unix build on older libtools.
> >
>
> Everyt
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:09:00 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> The new colour map syntax Peter B introduced after 1.5.1 requires a
> different line:
>
> (load (build-path geda-rc-path "gschem-colormap-lightbg")) ; light
> background
>
> We could provide a gschem-lightbg.scm available to make this ba
John Doty wrote:
>
> On Jan 16, 2009, at 7:22 AM, Robas, Teodor wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am trying to create a simbol for LM6142 (dual opamp). But when I
>> place it into a schematic, and try to declare slot=2, the pin numbers
>> are not changing.
>
> Several problems.
>
> 1. You have your pinseq
"Oliver Lehmann" writes:
> Have you tried my two uploaded examples?
Both render in landscape for me, in the PS files. One is auto-rotated
by ps2pdf, but for both, the print is properly rotated with respect to
the page it's rendered on.
___
geda-user
> I was wondering do you have written directions, not that the pictures aren't
> self explanitory, that go along with it? Or should I go by Direct Etch
> PCB's website? I thought I'd check before trying it.
My technique, as shown, is not really much different than what is
documented online. Yo
> - free arcs - now it is possible just quarter of circle. But I can
> do ellipse in PCB source files by manual edit. Can I define just
> endpoints by clicking on canvas ?
Not at this time.
> - puller - I found it on DJ Delorie's page. Feature looks very good
> but seems not yet in the mai
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
