Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:26 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $ ls src/hid/batch/
>>> batch.c batch_lists.h
>>> ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $
>>>
>>> There is no hid.conf
>> Then you have an incomplete source tree. That hid.conf was
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:26 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $ ls src/hid/batch/
> > batch.c batch_lists.h
> > ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $
> >
> > There is no hid.conf
>
> Then you have an incomplete source tree. That hid.conf was added in
> May 2006 w
Could you send me a board that triggers this?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Ok,
Id did some investigation on this.
src/hid/png/png.c:1093
I found that when gdImageCreate(r,r) is called with r=0, it'll not create
anything and will returm NULL. It is confirmed by the documetation.
Since the gc->brush is null, it will cause the segfault
when gdImageColorAllocate(null,..
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:26 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $ ls src/hid/batch/
> > batch.c batch_lists.h
> > ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $
> >
> > There is no hid.conf
>
> Then you have an incomplete source tree. That hid.conf was added in
> May 2006 w
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:26 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Then you have an incomplete source tree. That hid.conf was added in
> May 2006 when the batch HID was added.
>
>
Thanks, I will verify this.
It really surprises me.
___
geda-user mailing l
> ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $ ls src/hid/batch/
> batch.c batch_lists.h
> ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $
>
> There is no hid.conf
Then you have an incomplete source tree. That hid.conf was added in
May 2006 when the batch HID was added.
_
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:06 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > > So, look in src/hid/batch/hid.conf:
> > >
> > > type=gui
>
> Did you look in src/hid/batch/hid.conf ?
>
ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $ ls src/hid/batch/
batch.c batch_lists.h
ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $
There is no h
> > So, look in src/hid/batch/hid.conf:
> >
> > type=gui
Did you look in src/hid/batch/hid.conf ?
> On my test box GTK is installed.
Doesn't matter.
> ste...@amd64-x2 ~/geda/pcb-20081128 $ ./configure --with-gui=batch
>
> gives
>
> checking ./src/hid/ps/hid.conf
Did you see a "checking ./s
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 13:31 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> HIDs are auto-detected:
>
> for hid in `cd $srcdir/src/hid; echo *`; do
> F=$srcdir/src/hid/$hid/hid.conf
> if test -f $F
> then
> echo checking $F
> . $F
> case $type in
> gui ) hid_guis="$hid_guis $hid"
HIDs are auto-detected:
for hid in `cd $srcdir/src/hid; echo *`; do
F=$srcdir/src/hid/$hid/hid.conf
if test -f $F
then
echo checking $F
. $F
case $type in
gui ) hid_guis="$hid_guis $hid" ;;
printer ) hid_printers="$hid_printers $hid" ;;
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 12:45 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > >checking for which gui to use... batch
> > >configure: error: batch is not a valid gui
>
> That works just fine for me, using the git head.
>
For PCB 20081128:
>From configure.ac
>AC_MSG_CHECKING([for which gui to use])
>AC_ARG_WITH([gu
> >checking for which gui to use... batch
> >configure: error: batch is not a valid gui
That works just fine for me, using the git head.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 17:34 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 18:26 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 14:42 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > A related question:
> >
> > Is --enable-dbus only valid in conjunction with a GUI (GTK/Motif) or can
> > dbus be used
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 18:26 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 14:42 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> A related question:
>
> Is --enable-dbus only valid in conjunction with a GUI (GTK/Motif) or can
> dbus be used if PCB is compiled without GUI (we have a bug related to
> this in Gen
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 14:42 -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> It is recognized by configure still. You get a pcb with no gui at
> all, which is only useful if you want to use the exporters. However,
> these days, it's better to configure with the "batch" gui, as you get
> fewer warning messages when ru
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:25 AM, David SMITH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:05:05PM +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:47:28 +, David SMITH wrote:
>>
>> > From a user's point-of-view, it makes life much easier because they no
>> > longer have the hassle of generating
David SMITH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:05:05PM +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:47:28 +, David SMITH wrote:
>>
>>> From a user's point-of-view, it makes life much easier because they no
>>> longer have the hassle of generating Gerbers (e.g. getting the correct
>
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 07:05:05PM +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Tue, 03 Mar 2009 16:47:28 +, David SMITH wrote:
>
> > From a user's point-of-view, it makes life much easier because they no
> > longer have the hassle of generating Gerbers (e.g. getting the correct
> > version of RS274, p
On Thu, 05 Mar 2009 10:30:29 +0300, Ineiev wrote:
> It now contains --merge-drills option to output all drills into single
> "unplated" file; probably this can be useful for producing
> "single-sided" boards.
I'd prefer an option "single sided". This should produce gerbers suitable
to send to th
20 matches
Mail list logo
