Hi, r,
Thank you very much. You suggestion works fine. I am not quite familiar
with Verilog grammar. Seems it is my fault missing the "posedge" for
reset. :)
Best regards,
Yujie Wen
r 写道:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:12 AM, 温宇杰 wrote:
>
>> always @(posedge CLK or RESET) begin
>> if (RESET =
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 14:55 +0100 schrieb Stefan Salewski:
>
> I think pinseq is not really needed, if I remember correctly DJ's
> djboxsym does not write a pinseq. pinseq may be needed for spice
> simulation tools.
Sorry, that was wrong.
djboxsym was not writing pintypes which gave gsym
Stuart Brorson wrote:
>> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
>> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
>> wasn't that much work.
>
> Pretty easy is right.
>
>> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
>
> Quit yer whining
DJ Delorie wrote:
>>> ./pcb.settings
>>> ~/.pcb/settings
>>> ${prefix}/share/pcb/settings
>> WTF PCB?
>
> I added a global settings file support similar to .gafrc and .gschemrc
> a long time ago. I don't know why the gtk hid chose not to use it and
> do its own thing in an incompat
Hello,
I have the minor problem that building of pcb-20081128 gives me always
an empty directory called pcb-20081128.
First I assumed that it was my error, but now I did a local build in my
home directory without root permission, with same result. I did
mkdir /home/stefan/pcbtestinst/
./configu
On Mar 11, 2009, at 12:19 PM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Wednesday 11 March 2009 17:35:21 John Doty wrote:
>
>> And all of the crazy IEC417 symbols (whose pins aren't real anyway).
>
> Now that I have my own set of nicely-matching lightweight symbols,
> the only
> syms I really use from the gED
OK, pcb snapshot 20081128 compiles and works without GUI after
cp src/hid/gtk/hid.conf src/hid/batch/
I guess the Gentoo quality warning is a result of missing
#include misc.h
in hid/batch/batch.c or similar. There is a message
"unknown action `PointCursor'"?
ste...@amd64-x2 ~/gedatest/DAD $
On Wednesday 11 March 2009 17:35:21 John Doty wrote:
> And all of the crazy IEC417 symbols (whose pins aren't real anyway).
Now that I have my own set of nicely-matching lightweight symbols, the only
syms I really use from the gEDA symbols package are the IEC417 ones... really
useful for block
On Mar 11, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
>>> H maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation:
>>>
>>> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq
>>>
>>> I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. Maybe people will complain less
>>> if it's fixed.
>>
>> Wh
H ?maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation:
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq
I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. ?Maybe people will complain less
if it's fixed.
Who ever removes the text that states that pinseq= is a requirement,
please actua
On Mar 11, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
>> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
>> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
>> wasn't that much work.
>
> Pretty easy is right.
>
>> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq
[snip]
> H maybe I need to change this piece of gEDA documentation:
>
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list#pinseq
>
> I'm pretty sure this page is wrong. Maybe people will complain less
> if it's fixed.
Who ever removes the text that states that pinseq= is a requiremen
> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
> wasn't that much work.
Pretty easy is right.
> However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
Quit yer whining.
Pinseq is not used unless you hav
Hi
I have updated the Russian .po translation for gschem, gattrib,
libgeda35 at https://translations.edge.launchpad.net/geda
Can someone pull it?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-use
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 16:36 +0100 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause:
> Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
> modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
> wasn't that much work. However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
>
> Phi
>> I don't feel too strongly on the issue (can't speak for other PCB
>> developers), but usually you see the comments preceding the code
>> they relate to, or on the same line.
>
> I do feel strongly, they should precede the code.
I'll fix that and resubmit the patch.
___
> > ./pcb.settings
> > ~/.pcb/settings
> > ${prefix}/share/pcb/settings
>
> WTF PCB?
I added a global settings file support similar to .gafrc and .gschemrc
a long time ago. I don't know why the gtk hid chose not to use it and
do its own thing in an incompatible way. Saving proje
Well, I just used gschem to make symbols for the 64-pin XC9572 (by
modifying the symbols for the 44-pin XC9532 from gedasymbols.org). It
wasn't that much work. However now I'll have to set all those pinseq values.
Philipp
___
geda-user mailing list
ged
> Is this saying we are using level 3 postscript?
You need that syntax if you want the encapsulation comments to be
interpreted. That doesn't mean that the postscript interpreter must
be 3.0.
> Do we use level 3 postscript commands?
No. Just level 3 encapsulation (the %%Page: comments).
> I
Am Mittwoch, den 11.03.2009, 13:42 +0100 schrieb Philipp Klaus Krause:
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list sys that each pin
> needs both a pinnumber and a pinseq. Why? Just so everyone who creates
> a symbol using gschem has to click and type twice as much? Is there some
> too
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 20:17 -0400, Bob Paddock wrote:
>>
>> static const char * const calib_lines[] = {
>> - "%!PS-Adobe\n",
>> + "%!PS-Adobe-3.0\n",
>
> Is this saying we are using level 3 postscript?
>
> Do we use level 3 postscript comm
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:master_attributes_list sys that each pin
needs both a pinnumber and a pinseq. Why? Just so everyone who creates
a symbol using gschem has to click and type twice as much? Is there some
tool that just duplicates the values of pinnumber into pinseq?
Philipp
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 20:56 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Thanks, but... the "preferences" file is gtk-specific. The generic
> file PCB uses is (in order):
>
> ./pcb.settings
> ~/.pcb/settings
> ${prefix}/share/pcb/settings
WTF PCB?
I use GTK PCB, and have none of the above files.
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 17:47 -0700, Josh Jordan wrote:
> This patch lets gsch2pcb open up ~/.pcb/preferences and read the
>library-newlib = paths and add them to the list of places to get
>footprints. The patch is directly for gsch2pcb.c
If you could send patches readdy for applying, that
On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 20:17 -0400, Bob Paddock wrote:
>
> static const char * const calib_lines[] = {
> - "%!PS-Adobe\n",
> + "%!PS-Adobe-3.0\n",
Is this saying we are using level 3 postscript?
Do we use level 3 postscript commands?
If not, we should probably leave this as it was, otherwise w
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 11:12 AM, 温宇杰 wrote:
>
> always @(posedge CLK or RESET) begin
> if (RESET == 1) begin Q = 0;
> end
I don't know much about iverilog but you may want to try this form:
always @(posedge CLK or posedge RESET) begin
Regards,
-r
__
Hi,
I am writing some netlist generator in the Icarus Verilog 0.8 release
for our own FPGA-like devices. But I ran into a question that whether
Icarus Verilog can synthesis out flip-flops with asynchronous reset input.
When I run iverilog with command "iverilog -tfpga -parch=virtex test.v"
and th
27 matches
Mail list logo
