Hi DJ and all,
On Mon, 2009-09-21 at 21:01 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > No need to remember two sets of update commands anymore...
>
> Or perhaps some form of blog app? I wonder which, if any, would work
> for this type of data and user base.
>
>
> _
> No need to remember two sets of update commands anymore...
Or perhaps some form of blog app? I wonder which, if any, would work
for this type of data and user base.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mai
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 20:37:20 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> So a official spice lib - gpleda. User-contributed spice models -
> gedasymbols. Sound reasonable?
To me, it does ;-)
> I probably should figure out how to migrate to git, though, or something
> more modern than cvs.
+1
No need to remem
> I favor gpleda. spice files aren't really symbols and adding them
> to gedasymbols would confuse that website's purpose.
Hmmm... what exactly is gedasymbol's "purpose" ? It started as just
symbols, then symbols and footprints, then symbols, footprints, and
tools, now symbols, footprints, tool
> > I think gedasymbols is not the right place. The spicelib does not
> > provide any model or symbol.
>
> gedasymbols hosts scripts and documentation too.
I think user-contributed spice models may have a home on gedasymbols
too :-)
___
geda-user mai
I favor gpleda. spice files aren't really symbols and adding them to
gedasymbols would confuse that website's purpose. But gpleda is a
multipurpose website and our spice library would fit nicely there.
-Alan
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:18:41
On Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:18:41 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote:
>> How about gedasymbols.org?
>
> I think gedasymbols is not the right place. The spicelib does not
> provide any model or symbol.
gedasymbols hosts scripts and documentation too. I'd prefer to find all
(most) resources for my favortite EDA
Thanks. I'll work on integrating my Linear Technology scripts.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 3:13 AM, Werner Hoch wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
> On Montag, 21. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Please do publicize the repository. Or give me your own url, if
>> you're running a server.
>
> I've pushe
On 9/21/09, gene glick wrote:
>
>> Actually, you didn't identify PCB version: 1.99y is just any GIT point
>> after pcb-20081128 snapshot.
>>
>
> O :) If that's the case,
Most probably, no :(
this is an uneducated opinion of an uneducated user, though.
> I don't know how to tell. Any way fo
Hi Kai-Martin,
On Samstag, 19. September 2009, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 16:07:29 +0200, Werner Hoch wrote:
> > I've all the stuff in a local git repository, I can push it to a
> > public repository. (github or repo.or.cz)
>
> How about gedasymbols.org?
I think gedasymbols is
Hi Alan,
On Montag, 21. September 2009, asom...@gmail.com wrote:
> Please do publicize the repository. Or give me your own url, if
> you're running a server.
I've pushed it to github:
http://github.com/werner2101/spicelib
I'd like to see how github works compared to repo.or.cz.
As everything i
> Actually, you didn't identify PCB version: 1.99y is just any GIT point
> after pcb-20081128 snapshot.
>
O :) If that's the case, I don't know how to tell. Any way for me
to know? Looks like my source files are all dated March 30th, 2009.
_
(sorry, this is off-topic)
diff --git a/src/misc.c b/src/misc.c
index 693da81..89d5c84 100644
--- a/src/misc.c
+++ b/src/misc.c
@@ -1836,18 +1836,18 @@ LayerGroupsToString (LayerGroupTypePtr lg)
char *
pcb_author (void)
{
-#ifdef HAVE_GETPWUID
- static struct passwd *pwentry;
static char *fa
On 9/21/09, gene glick wrote:
> I've had this version crash about a half dozen times. It's not just the
> program itself bombing, it crashes linux. The restore process is
> painful - it takes a while running fsck -v -y to get things back to
> normal.
> Anyway, my recollection is that each crash
14 matches
Mail list logo
