On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 5:05 PM, kai-martin knaak
<[1]...@familieknaak.de> wrote:
Oliver King-Smith wrote:
> 1) It is useful for seeing the decoupling caps on various components
and
> checking they have been done to spec.
> 2) Often there are multiple power rails in the schema
> Thanks for that script. I like the way you load the netlist and save.
> So, whenever you think of a little change to the repeated cell, just
> remake the board with the script, then run DRCs on it, and output.
That's what I did. I had one .pcb that was one channel, and one that
was everything
DJ Delorie wrote:
Does what's pasted from the buffer stay selected?
Yes. I used it with a pcb script on the powermeter board. Each
renumber adds 10 to whatever's in the buffer...
Thanks for that script. I like the way you load the netlist and save.
So, whenever you think of a little change
> Does what's pasted from the buffer stay selected?
Yes. I used it with a pcb script on the powermeter board. Each
renumber adds 10 to whatever's in the buffer...
LoadFrom(Layout,powermeter-blank.pcb)
LoadFrom(LayoutToBuffer,channel1.pcb)
# left upper, first one already there
# First is at 20
DJ Delorie wrote:
That's a great idea for low-effort/high-value.
At least for those of us who array things on mere boards
instead of chips...
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/renumberblock.c
Hmm... looks like that would work good for things I can select easily.
Does what's pasted from the buffer s
> That's a great idea for low-effort/high-value.
> At least for those of us who array things on mere boards
> instead of chips...
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/renumberblock.c
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bi
kai-martin knaak wrote:
In the meantime, a more powerful copy procedure could reduce
the effort:
Imagine, the copy-buffer action would accept a string parameter
that it adds to the refdes property of every footprint before
actually pasting to the layout. If this string matches the
string gnetlis
kai-martin knaak wrote:
John Griessen wrote:
When you say shortcuts it sounds like the keybindings for keys to use
instead of menu pulldowns. There is an existing mechanism for changing
these in pcbmenu.res files in a local project directory.
Unfortunately, the GTK internal mechanism of shor
Larry Doolittle wrote:
>> All the cutting, sed-ing and pasting of the subcircuits to multiple
>> instances, with replication of later changes on all copies is pretty
>> unflexible.
>
> Agree 100%.
+1
Cloning, referencing, or whatever we may call it, would need
a fair amount of programming. Give
I am using ltspice as well
__
From: kai-martin knaak
To: geda-u...@seul.org
Sent: Tue, August 17, 2010 4:48:59 PM
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Multiple pages
Oliver King-Smith wrote:
> I have schematic on one pag
Oliver King-Smith wrote:
> 1) It is useful for seeing the decoupling caps on various components and
> checking they have been done to spec.
> 2) Often there are multiple power rails in the schematic, and it is
> important to see which components are using which power rails both for
> load and isol
Oliver King-Smith wrote:
> I have schematic on one page where I have connected the power to VCC and
> GND symbols. I have connected the non power inputs and outputs to
> Input/Output Generic symbols.
>
> So imagine I want to just hook this page up to some spice primitives to
> test out the circu
John Griessen wrote:
> When you say shortcuts it sounds like the keybindings for keys to use
> instead of menu pulldowns. There is an existing mechanism for changing
> these in pcbmenu.res files in a local project directory.
Unfortunately, the GTK internal mechanism of shortcut configuration on
Bert Timmerman wrote:
> Maybe a single button would do to open a popup dialog to alter layer
> settings.
>
> Maybe something like this screenshot from AutoCAD:
>
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~ljh4timm/downloads/Layer_properties_manager.jpg
There is no much benefit in presenting all the properties of
I may be opening up a can of worms here, but I think it makes sense to
have standard symbols for power rails in the sub schematics.
Admittedly this is not hard to create within gschem.
I know there has been some discussion about not having the power pins
on the schematic for symbols
15 matches
Mail list logo
