>
> But what I am looking for is a good way to switch between the stable
> and the unstable version?
I don't have much experience with it but it sounds like the
'alternatives' command is designed for this type of situation:
http://linux.die.net/man/8/update-alternatives
-Tom Pope
__
I built pcb-20100929 last night using the minipack environment in a
virtualbox VM with a fresh Ubuntu 10.10 install. Process was nearly
painles: I had to find alternative sources to the ones given in the
pixman and gd recipes(it seems like libgd.org has been down for a long
time), but that was the
>
> > I don't want to disturb you too much. But can I get version 20100929
> > of PCB for Windows ? I still use pcb-2009 but I am getting tired
> > of "Request for bounding box of unsupported type 1024" bug. I found
> > that the problem is fixed in the pcb-2010 version.
>
> I wasn't able to
Got it, deleted it.
~Abhijit
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 17:21, rickman <[1]gnuarm.g...@arius.com>
wrote:
I use a separate email address for this list and that address
received a spam email. � It doesn't look like that email came
through this list, but rather the list was s
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 22:26 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> pin[pinnumber=1] {
> pinnumber="99";
> }
And regarding stuff like the above - where we key off one attribute and
change it in the rule, IF that is ever legal - we should do it like a
PLC executes its processing cycles.
Freeze a view
> That is ancestory.
I'm a big fan of backwards compatibility :-)
But it does point out that no one style seems to have a clear majority
of the mindset :-P
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:58 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > I thought we used "/" for netlist hierarchy. At least - that is what I
> > coded for the netlist viewer in PCB.
>
> I suggested Attributes use : to "assign" attributes to owners, to
> avoid conflict.
That is a good separator prefix for name
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 22:16 +0200, Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> So we are more or less looking at a simplified hierarchical path syntax, where
> elements without explicit id= provide default id based on the type and other
> attributes?
>
> Examples:
> U1.1.net=Vcc (global attribute, pinnum
Hello,
currently I am using gEDA 1.6.2 on a Ubuntu Linux System in a
VirtualBox -> this runs very good.
For test reasons, I would like also to install the 1.7.x version of
gEDA. I can do it at a different place - that's no problem.
But what I am looking for is a good way to swi
> I thought we used "/" for netlist hierarchy. At least - that is what I
> coded for the netlist viewer in PCB.
I suggested Attributes use : to "assign" attributes to owners, to
avoid conflict.
Like PCB:background-color=yellow
The syntax for what the owner owns can be different.
PCB:drc.si
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 16:23 -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> > We'd have to work a bit on the syntax, precedence, resolution rules and how
> > to
>
> For PCB attributes, we're going with foo:bar for heirarchy (or at
> least grouping), so U3:14.net=+5v ?
>
> (: for heirarchy, . for attributes ?)
I tho
> We'd have to work a bit on the syntax, precedence, resolution rules and how to
For PCB attributes, we're going with foo:bar for heirarchy (or at
least grouping), so U3:14.net=+5v ?
(: for heirarchy, . for attributes ?)
___
geda-user mailing list
ge
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:31:03PM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> This is a really neat idea..
>
> P pin number ":1" doesn't really matter, it is just a way of referring
> to a particular pin. If we could reference by other means, that would
> also be cool. I'm thinking of some kind of "id=..." at
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:36:20AM -0400, rickman wrote:
> On 4/13/2011 8:56 AM, ge...@igor2.repo.hu wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
>>> Yes I got this.
>>>
>>> OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
>>> it be worth switching
Hi Daniel,
On Samstag, 19. März 2011, Daniel Ross wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to fill out the Tragesym template for an
> ATmega128RFA1, but the script gives me an error when I pass it the
> CSV file (renamed to a ".sch" file):
>
> "error: version attribut missing"
>
> is mostly on my end (getting a build environment set up seems more
> problematic than I expected).
Using the minipack build environment has been working for building the
Windows version.
> If anyone wants to help make the process more robust, feel free :-)
If the steps for creating the release
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:38:05AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> Another option is to look at gerbv and see if it has merging
> capabilities. I know PCB is careful to use a consistent set of
> apertures across gerbers;
Yes, and thank you very much for that feature... I've used it
to merge layers (m
DJ's Panelization Scripts:
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/
pcb2panel - combines boards into a "panel" board (outline for each
board as an element) for easy editing).
panel2pcb - reads panel board and input pcb's, produces a composite
panel pcb.
Although I've never d
> I don't want to disturb you too much. But can I get version 20100929
> of PCB for Windows ? I still use pcb-2009 but I am getting tired
> of "Request for bounding box of unsupported type 1024" bug. I found
> that the problem is fixed in the pcb-2010 version.
I wasn't able to build the win32
>
>Hmm... I used to get that error on Linux, but it never bothered me (I
>used PCB fine.) Just leave the message log open in the background and
>it won't bother you.
I have the message log open but GUI freezes. I have to close PCB and restart it
Hmm... I used to get that error on Linux, but it never bothered me (I
used PCB fine.) Just leave the message log open in the background and
it won't bother you.
On 13 April 2011 13:19, Vaclav Peroutka <[1]vacla...@seznam.cz> wrote:
Hello all,
I don't want to disturb you too
On 4/13/2011 8:56 AM, ge...@igor2.repo.hu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
Yes I got this.
OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
it be worth switching to google groups or similar? The interface is
nice and you can use it like
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 01:02:40PM +0100, Andrew Seddon wrote:
> Yes I got this.
>
> OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
> it be worth switching to google groups or similar? The interface is
> nice and you can use it like a traditional mailing list if desired.
L
Hi all,
First I'd like to say thanks to all the gEDA devs for creating such a
great EDA package. After the initial learning curve and time spent
learning all the little quirks and file formats, I much prefer gEDA
over the commercial packages I've had to use.
I've just started panelising some desi
Hello all,
I don't want to disturb you too much. But can I get version 20100929 of PCB for
Windows ? I still use pcb-2009 but I am getting tired of "Request for
bounding box of unsupported type 1024" bug. I found that the problem is fixed
in the pcb-2010 version.
Thank you in advance,
Vacl
Yes, a while back IIRC.
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of rickman
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 7:52 AM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: gEDA-user: Spam Email to This List
>
> I use a separa
I got mail too. I deleted it.
On 13 April 2011 12:51, rickman <[1]gnuarm.g...@arius.com> wrote:
I use a separate email address for this list and that address
received a spam email. It doesn't look like that email came through
this list, but rather the list was somehow harves
Yes I got this.
OT: I'm new hear so please feel free to ignore this comment, but might
it be worth switching to google groups or similar? The interface is
nice and you can use it like a traditional mailing list if desired.
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 12:51 PM, rickman wrote:
> I use a separate email
Yes, I got a mail from him/them at 12.March 2011. I think, someone from
this firm reads the list, too. He can extract the mail-adresses from
each sender. So, no need to hack the list-software itself.
Best regards,
Felix
Am 13.04.2011 13:51, schrieb rickman:
I use a separate email address for t
I use a separate email address for this list and that address received a
spam email. It doesn't look like that email came through this list, but
rather the list was somehow harvested for email addresses and the
message sent directly. Did anyone else get an email from
s...@jxtpcb.com with the
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 09:31:24AM +0100, Andy Fierman wrote:
> If you are going to model the PA - particularly to look at resonance
> effects - then you should include reasonably accurate models for the
> inductors and capacitors which include their major parasitic
> components.
>
> The Murata Ch
If anybody's interested there's a lot of info on previous attempts to
produce standards based EDA formats here;
http://xml.coverpages.org/xmlAndEDA.html
this is probably old hat to many of you!
My assessment is;
1. They tried to cover way too much in one go with edaXML, PCB's, MCM,
fat symbols,
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Andy Fierman
wrote:
> If you are going to model the PA - particularly to look at resonance
> effects - then you should include reasonably accurate models for the
> inductors and capacitors which include their major parasitic
> components.
>
> The Murata Chip S-Para
If you are going to model the PA - particularly to look at resonance
effects - then you should include reasonably accurate models for the
inductors and capacitors which include their major parasitic
components.
The Murata Chip S-Parameter & Impedance Library is a handy tool for
looking at their ce
34 matches
Mail list logo
