01005 (0402 metric) : 0.016" × 0.008" (0.4 mm × 0.2 mm)
0201 (0603 metric) : 0.024" × 0.012" (0.6 mm × 0.3 mm)
0402 (1005 metric) : 0.04" × 0.02" (1.0 mm × 0.5 mm)
0603 (1608 metric) : 0.063" × 0.031" (1.6 mm × 0.8 mm)
0805 (2013 metric) : 0.08" × 0.05" (2.0
On 05/25/2011 06:22 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
I like this idea!
Had the same problem few times...
+1
done.
---<)kaimartin(>---
$0.02 request/opinion from me: a keyword, rather than a number, so
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 02:40:58PM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:03:06 +0200
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> > This said, most capacitors look to have a square profile, but
> > resonance frequencies observed on microstrip line change between
> > mounting the layers parallel
Felix Ruoff wrote:
> Later in that thread
> (http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user/2010-April/046781.html) you
> said, that you will send the patches, but I can't find an attachment
I forgot to attach in that post and sent another one a few minutes
later:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.com
> >> But the seed idea is growing on me too.
> >
> > Beats python eggs!
>
> There is certainly a smell of coolness. But the entities don't
> act as seedlings.
It was supposed to be a pun. Seed? Grow? :-P
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mor
John Griessen wrote:
>> But the seed idea is growing on me too.
>
> Beats python eggs!
There is certainly a smell of coolness. But the entities don't
act as seedlings. They are not self contained and they don't
unfold into something bigger. Instead, many different of them
are used as buildin
> Otherwise my head starts to twirl in confusion over how to support
> it or maintain the tool that does it.
True. Please re-read my pin mapping doc, and see if your swirling
head can come up with a solution ;-)
http://www.delorie.com/pcb/pin-mapping.html
Maybe the solution for FPGAs and the l
On 05/24/2011 07:22 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
if it's layout-specific data, the copy in the layout is correct.
Perhaps we need to keep track of whether the data in the layout and
schematic originated in that file, or is the result of user changes
elsewhere being imported.
But any solution depends on
David C. Kerber wrote:
> The easy answer to this is to do what Cisco does with their ASDM
> software: you can set an option that tells it to present to the
> user the exact text of every command it is sending to the router.
I have seen some CAD suites do this. IIRC, these were MicroStation,
va
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
>> I like this idea!
>
> Had the same problem few times...
>
> +1
>
done.
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.de
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pool.sks-keyservers.
On 05/24/2011 04:02 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
Mike Bushroe writes:
> As for names, data pack
I like data pack.
But the seed idea is growing on me too.
Beats python eggs! They sound like a natural disaster in Florida...
___
geda-user mailing list
g
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:03:06 +0200
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
>> This said, most capacitors look to have a square profile, but
>> resonance frequencies observed on microstrip line change between
>> mounting the layers parallel or perpendic
Peter:
> k...@aspodata.se (Karl Hammar) writes:
> >[about code that enables recursion in component-library-search]
> Nack, for a number of reasons.
>
*
> 1) GRegex was introduced in GLib 2.14, and during the 1.7.x cycle we are
> targetting GLib 2.12 or later.
Regular expression is actually
On Wed, 25 May 2011 23:03:06 +0200
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> This said, most capacitors look to have a square profile, but
> resonance frequencies observed on microstrip line change between
> mounting the layers parallel or perpendicular to the ground plane.
> The problem is that, for most capacit
> http://www.xilinx.com/support/documentation/user_guides/ug385.pdf
Ok, I'll put you down for that one.
(in case you hadn't noticed, the rule today is "if you suggest it, you
get to do it" ;)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http:/
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Tom Pope wrote:
> Just dwelling on the 'what' phase a little more, can we start a few
> pages on the wiki for people to list:
>
> a) all the workflows people would like supported (maybe break it down
> into newby GUI workflows, 'power user' GUI workflows and script
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:11:49AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:41:26 -0700
>> Colin D Bennett wrote:
>>
>> > (1) Why is RESC0603L/N/M much smaller than '0603'?
>> > (2) Why is there no similarly named set of RES
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 11:10:13AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 16:56:46 +0200
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:11:49AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > > On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:41:26 -0700
> > > Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > >
> > > > (1) Why is RE
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 05:04:04PM +0200, Felix Ruoff wrote:
> I like this idea!
Had the same problem few times...
+1
--
Krzysztof Kościuszkiewicz
"Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" -- Leonardo da Vinci
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@
> > > - 0603
> > This is RESC1608N
>
> It's designed for the same component package, but the footprints in pcb
> are not identical.
Not exactly, no, but that's the closest substitution.
> (1) Is the SMD package "metric name" commonly used or standardized?
I think that's more of a personal choi
On Wed, 25 May 2011 11:10:13 -0700
Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 16:56:46 +0200
> Gabriel Paubert wrote:
>
> > Indeed. I found a set of recommended footprints that distinguishes
> > resistors from capacitors:
> ...
> Have you found the Walsin-recommended footprints for SMD chip
On Wed, 25 May 2011 16:56:46 +0200
Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:11:49AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:41:26 -0700
> > Colin D Bennett wrote:
> >
> > > (1) Why is RESC0603L/N/M much smaller than '0603'?
> > > (2) Why is there no similarly named s
On Wed, 25 May 2011 13:11:50 -0400
DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > - 0603
>
> This is RESC1608N
It's designed for the same component package, but the footprints in pcb
are not identical.
> > - RESC0603L / RESC0603N / RESC0603M
>
> These are metric :-)
As I said before, not at all confusing. Surely
Thank you!
Am 25.05.2011 19:21, schrieb DJ Delorie:
A patch to remove this from documentation (and one variable from the
source) is appended.
Pushed.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ge
> A patch to remove this from documentation (and one variable from the
> source) is appended.
Pushed.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
A patch to remove this from documentation (and one variable from the
source) is appended.
Kind regards,
Felix
Am 25.05.2011 19:11, schrieb DJ Delorie:
I think that option is a leftover from my initial HID conversion.
It would have been lesstif-specific anyway, the gtk hid has its own
menu file
> - 0603
This is RESC1608N
> - RESC0603L / RESC0603N / RESC0603M
These are metric :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
I think that option is a leftover from my initial HID conversion.
It would have been lesstif-specific anyway, the gtk hid has its own
menu file (gpcb-menu.res, same locations)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi
> The easy answer to this is to do what Cisco does with their ASDM
> software: you can set an option that tells it to present to the user
> the exact text of every command it is sending to the router.
PCB is close to this - many of the things it does already go through
the action (scripting) laye
> The fundamental problem here is that gnetlist is designed to deliver
John, I think this is your exuse to rewrite it from scratch "the right
way". As they say, "show us your power".
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul
> can we start a few pages on the wiki for people to list:
Go for it.
> If someone can spell out what's desired I'm happy to help out making
> symbol and footprint libraries.
At this point, I think "If you want to do it" is the criteria for the
heavy libraries. Don't worry about what people wa
> I don't claim to have any great level of experience in writing APIs
> at all - but I have already started some parts db stuff I would like
> to continue - put me down against some parts db work.
Done! :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.s
Hello Kai-Martin,
Am 25.05.2011 16:32, schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
Last year, I wrote a set patches to correct this and while at it, move
the
source of the information into the source. I introduced an additional
parameter in the comment syntax to allow for arbitrary sequence in the
compiled manua
I like this idea!
Am 25.05.2011 16:46, schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
While looking into ways to beautify my symbols, I just looked at the file
format documentation in
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:file_format_spec
The meaning of fields is given in tables. I find myself counting lines in
the tab
While looking into ways to beautify my symbols, I just looked at the file
format documentation in
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:file_format_spec
The meaning of fields is given in tables. I find myself counting lines in
the table to identify which item to change in my symbols. How about a colum
Felix Ruoff wrote:
> in the pcb-documentation "B.3 Menu Files and Defaults" is the
> command-line option -dumpmenu described,
Almost all the command line options described in the PCB manual are bogus.
Apparently, the options got a major rewrite sometime in the past which did not
make it into the
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 07:11:49AM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:41:26 -0700
> Colin D Bennett wrote:
>
> > (1) Why is RESC0603L/N/M much smaller than '0603'?
> > (2) Why is there no similarly named set of RESC0805L/N/M for 0805
> > size? (3) Why does RESC1608M nearly mat
On Wed, 25 May 2011 06:41:26 -0700
Colin D Bennett wrote:
> (1) Why is RESC0603L/N/M much smaller than '0603'?
> (2) Why is there no similarly named set of RESC0805L/N/M for 0805
> size? (3) Why does RESC1608M nearly match the '0603' footprint?
> Is there an imperial/metric naming confusion h
I discovered that the pcb footprint library contains a number of 0603
SMT footprints. The primary ones I am concerned with are:
- 0603
- RESC0603L / RESC0603N / RESC0603M
and likewise for 0402. I understand that the IPC standard defines
three footprints for these SMT parts, called Least, Nomina
Hello,
in the pcb-documentation "B.3 Menu Files and Defaults" is the
command-line option -dumpmenu described, but it did not work at my
system. I have searched the source-code and just one boolean variable
'DumpMenuFile' in global.h can be found. Did I miss something?
If someone of you confi
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of John Doty
> Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 3:05 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Solving the light/heavy symbol problem
>
>
> On May 24, 2011, a
On May 25, 2011, at 3:38 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> * gnetlist needs the most work. It needs to be able to read a set of
> rules, query the database, and fill in additional attributes based
> on the rules. This need not be more than just "fill in the blanks"
> for now.
The fundamental problem
Just dwelling on the 'what' phase a little more, can we start a few
pages on the wiki for people to list:
a) all the workflows people would like supported (maybe break it down
into newby GUI workflows, 'power user' GUI workflows and scripted
flows.
b) new features wishlist
c) jobs that need doing
I don't claim to have any great level of experience in writing APIs at
all - but I have already started some parts db stuff I would like to
continue - put me down against some parts db work.
cheers,
Geoff
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 4:38 PM, DJ Delorie <[1]d...@delorie.com> wrote:
44 matches
Mail list logo
