On 20/05/11 17:01, DJ Delorie wrote:
* Standard library is light, users heavyify them (we need a better
verb for that ;) into a project-specific (or even site-global) heavy
symbol library.
Personally, I'd say that this is a sensible way to go.
I'd then suggest having an extra set of optio
I too have done some work in so much as getting a full gEDA suite
working under Cygwin. MinGW is probably a better option though.
Chris
On 25/01/11 22:05, Peter TB Brett wrote:
On Tuesday 25 January 2011 21:52:52 Terrance Hutchinson wrote:
I would like to help develop the Windows por
On 23/12/10 11:25, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 11:07 +, Chris Malton wrote:
I'd love to actually help fix this bug, and/or figure out what I'm doing
wrong, but I can't make head or tail of where I should be investigating.
I'd like to point out that the n
autorouter uses the
outline layer (which is not a good idea as the company I use for making
PCBs uses that for cuts!)
Thanks in advance for any help.
Chris Malton
SENSOR.pcb
Description: application/pcb-layout
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
DJ Delorie wrote:
It's in the usual place :-
For me, I wouldn't have classed Sourceforge as "the usual place". I'd
have considered geda.seul.org the usual place
Is there any chance of somebody updating the website to point to this?
Chris
___
g
On 19/09/2010 21:21, Cesar Strauss wrote:
On 19/9/2010 16:08, Chris Malton wrote:
Are you trying to tell me that I need to upload the unmodified sources
for gEDA, pcb, Cygwin and co?
It is the safest way, yes. Consider if any of the home sites went
offline, or changed the source page URL
27;t think I have to mirror this on my website.
Surely requiring that I do so would be madness?
Chris
On 19/09/2010 19:53, Cesar Strauss wrote:
On 19/9/2010 13:34, Chris Malton wrote:
Downloads from http://portablegaf.cmalton.me.uk
Please be sure you comply with clause 3 of GPL v2, which ensures
The only other way I can think of (that doesn't introduce dependencies)
involves a collection of Batch files, none of which are particularly
nice
Given that .NET gets installed as a Windows Update. I figured it was
probably safe. Especially given since the app only requires version
Hi John,
It needs .Net 2.0.
From the MS website: Supported Operating Systems:Windows 2000 Service
Pack 3;Windows 98;Windows 98 Second Edition;Windows ME;Windows Server
2003;Windows XP Service Pack 2
Looks like you're OK there.
Chris
On 19/09/2010 18:04, John Griessen wrote:
Constructive comments and feedback appreciated.
Yours,
Chris Malton
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Constructive comments and feedback appreciated.
Yours,
Chris Malton
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
11 matches
Mail list logo
