Re: gEDA-user: "Now who's with me?"

> > The LF netlister is all new anyway, I could add more attributes if > > needed. > > [jg]I read here: http://www.linuxfund.org/projects/pcb/proposal/ > that the LF netlister means forward annotation. Right, gschem->pcb is forward. pcb->gschem is back annotation. > I guess my idea doesn'

Re: gEDA-user: "Now who's with me?"

DJ Delorie wrote: >> -- putting out a new version of the >> gnetlist-pcb netlist with circuit values for the trace capacitances >> and distances. > > The LF netlister is all new anyway, I could add more attributes if > needed. [jg]I read here: http://www.linuxfund.org/projects/pcb/proposal

Re: gEDA-user: "Now who's with me?"

> Bragging on something like that kind of gnetlist to gnucap > integration could get more Linux_Fund contributions to help with PCB > using the same things -- putting out a new version of the > gnetlist-pcb netlist with circuit values for the trace capacitances > and distances. The LF netlister i

Re: gEDA-user: "Now who's with me?"

John P. Doty wrote: > Bill Gatliff wrote: >> In the bigger picture, I'll note that the tutorials and FAQs I've seen >> for gEDA all focus on a pretty specific workflow, which is to turn a >> schematic into a circuit board layout. There are obviously a zillion >> different ways that the tools would