Re: gEDA-user: [pcb] terminology update

Bert Timmerman wrote: > Looks good so far, keep on doing the Good Thing (tm) ;-) > > IMHO, the last sentence in Terminology:DRC is a bit harsh on the first > time users we are trying to encourage. Hee hee, yes. An unfortunate fact of life in technical documents is that humor is often annoyin

Re: gEDA-user: [pcb] terminology update

Hi DJ, Looks good so far, keep on doing the Good Thing (tm) ;-) IMHO, the last sentence in Terminology:DRC is a bit harsh on the first time users we are trying to encourage. OTOH, it is a realistic scenario to encounter (done that, been there as a first time user). However, it is better to pre

gEDA-user: [pcb] terminology update

I posted the updated files: http://www.delorie.com/pcb/docs/gs/ I started adding illustrations to the terminology section. Just a few terms, those that *need* illustrations, have them. ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.s