> Hmm. The fact that you have a "smartjack" demark at all (do you?)
No.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
DJ Delorie wrote:
> Actually, four wires all the way out the driveway. I know it's not
> the two-wire variety because the last time they had to fix it, they
> commented on the fact that I hadn't been "upgraded" to the two-wire
> one. I have two lightning protectors in the demarc box, not one.
Dave McGuire wrote:
> My last two DSL circuits had no voice capability.
Ahh, the difference between ADSL and SDSL. One of my pet peeves is
people saying "DSL" to mean ADSL...
Time to plug my Open SDSL Connectivity Project:
http://ifctfvax.Harhan.ORG/OpenSDSL/
Hey, I drew it in gschem origina
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 1:44 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Building the PCB+GL branch [WAS: Re:
>
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:59 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> I have a friend who lives 0.5 miles from the CO. Unfortunately, if
> you *drive* to the CO it's 4 miles or so. The wires go under a river,
> it seems! He got DSL once by finding someone who knew the wiring
> layout and was willing to TDR the lines
I have a friend who lives 0.5 miles from the CO. Unfortunately, if
you *drive* to the CO it's 4 miles or so. The wires go under a river,
it seems! He got DSL once by finding someone who knew the wiring
layout and was willing to TDR the lines to prove it to management, but
"something happened" a
> [...], while me, having grown up (at least chronologically!) in the
> 1970s, "broadband" is a more relaxed way of saying "multiple
> information channels via frequency-division multiplexing on multiple
> independent carriers".
And, doesn't DSL fit that? At the physical layer, at least - the
mul
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:47 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>Wow, that's pretty unusual!
>
> Yup, but then again, I *can't* get regular DSL service here.
I had exactly that problem when I lived in Cape Coral, FL...wound
up having to get a T-1 at close to $400/mo. Fortunately I was able
to defray th
>Wow, that's pretty unusual!
Yup, but then again, I *can't* get regular DSL service here.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
ssage-
>> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
>> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of DJ Delorie
>> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 1:29 PM
>> To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
>> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Building the PCB+GL branch [WAS: Re:
>>
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:35 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>On your side of the smartjack, I'm sure you do.
>
> Actually, four wires all the way out the driveway. I know it's not
> the two-wire variety because the last time they had to fix it, they
> commented on the fact that I hadn't been "upgraded" to
2009 1:29 PM
> To: geda-user@moria.seul.org
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Building the PCB+GL branch [WAS: Re:
> Open GL survey (for PCB)]
>
>
> > And for the past 10-15 years or so, the "last mile" of most T1 data
> > circuits have been delivered via a form of
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:02 PM, der Mouse wrote:
>>> They are? DSL certainly isn't (the baseband there is the audio
>>> range, which DSL specifically avoids) and,
>> My definition of "broadband" is "multiple communication channels
>> sharing bandwidth on the same medium", which does not, IMO, describe
The one from which my remarks were derived came from googling and
reading three or four pages which gave definitions, such as
[1]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseband and
[2]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadband. It is that baseband
uses the
frequency range whose lo
>On your side of the smartjack, I'm sure you do.
Actually, four wires all the way out the driveway. I know it's not
the two-wire variety because the last time they had to fix it, they
commented on the fact that I hadn't been "upgraded" to the two-wire
one. I have two lightning protectors in
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:28 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> And for the past 10-15 years or so, the "last mile" of most T1 data
>> circuits have been delivered via a form of DSL, and they typically
>> have no voice support either.
>
> Not mine. I got all four wires :-)
On your side of the smartjack, I'm
>> They are? DSL certainly isn't (the baseband there is the audio
>> range, which DSL specifically avoids) and,
> My definition of "broadband" is "multiple communication channels
> sharing bandwidth on the same medium", which does not, IMO, describe
> DSL. What is yours?
The one from which my re
> And for the past 10-15 years or so, the "last mile" of most T1 data
> circuits have been delivered via a form of DSL, and they typically
> have no voice support either.
Not mine. I got all four wires :-)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.s
On Feb 6, 2009, at 1:14 PM, David C. Kerber wrote:
And if I had a nickel for every time I've heard people, even
knowledgeable people, incorrectly use the term "broadband" to mean
"high-speed Internet connection" (when most such
>> connections are, in
fact, baseband)..
>>>
>>> Th
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Dave McGuire
> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2009 12:57 PM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Building the PCB+GL branch [WAS: Re:
>
On Feb 6, 2009, at 12:36 PM, der Mouse wrote:
>> And if I had a nickel for every time I've heard people, even
>> knowledgeable people, incorrectly use the term "broadband" to mean
>> "high-speed Internet connection" (when most such connections are, in
>> fact, baseband)..
>
> They are? DSL certain
> And if I had a nickel for every time I've heard people, even
> knowledgeable people, incorrectly use the term "broadband" to mean
> "high-speed Internet connection" (when most such connections are, in
> fact, baseband)..
They are? DSL certainly isn't (the baseband there is the audio range,
whic
On Feb 6, 2009, at 10:08 AM, Peter Clifton wrote:
> I'm not so convinced applying the terminology "anti-aliasing" is
> correct
> for jaggies on object edges. Its certainly not what I'd call
> aliasing on
> a digital oscillocope.. that matches the texture-sampling case. The
> edges are more a qu
On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 11:48 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> > I've not switched on anti-aliasing. I think it is important the geometry
> > has hard edges, and anti-aliasing will just increase memory
> > requirements / reduce rendering speed. (IIRC, it just renders bigger
> > than required, then fil
> Actually my question is why was it changed at all? My PCB manufacturers
> had absolutely no problems with the stacked positive/negative mixture
> of layers in the photoplotter files.
Yours didn't, others did.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@mor
On Mon, 2009-02-02 at 09:58 +0100, Gabriel Paubert wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:57:52AM +, Peter Clifton wrote:
[snip]
> > If you fancy playing with some other experimental polygon stuff though
> > (again, not yet backwards compatible), try the "master" branch which
> > does full real-
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 03:57:52AM +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:53 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> > > > Give the works so far a try:
> > > >
> > > > http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
> > > >
> > > > git clone git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
> > > > git checkou
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 23:53 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > > Give the works so far a try:
> > >
> > > http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
> > >
> > > git clone git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
> > > git checkout before_pours origin/before_pours
> >
> > git checkout -b before_pours origin
On Wednesday 28 January 2009 09:27:28 pm Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:59 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> > Should I expect a speed improvement with GLX or just cool stuff like
> > layer transparency? I suspect that's a feature that won't take much use
> > before I say "how did I li
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 19:59 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> without looking at the code, is it feasible without major pain to have
> GL be a runtime selection?
I was thinking I'd split out the HID vtable callbacks into GTK / GL
versions, and #ifdef the HID setup.
Since the HID vtable can (I think)
Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 22:13 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 01:11 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>>> Give the works so far a try:
>>>
>>> http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
>>>
>>> git clone git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
>>> git checkout before_pou
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 22:13 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 01:11 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > Give the works so far a try:
> >
> > http://repo.or.cz/w/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
> >
> > git clone git://repo.or.cz/geda-pcb/pcjc2.git
> > git checkout before_pours origin/before_pours
32 matches
Mail list logo
