On Jun 16, 2007, at 3:31 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>>Oh My. :) Is it a performance issue?
>
> Nope -- we have a fast enough LAN to handle it. But, can you imagine
> the sheer constancy of needing to re-synchronize against the
> repository for commonly edited files? :)
Ugh...Yes, I su
On 6/16/07, Mark Rages <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You might be amused by Linus's anti-CVS talk:
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4XpnKHJAok8
Or utterly offended. I was at that tech-talk. Things you should know
before watching:
* Linus has strong opinions about CVS and Subversion, and the peop
On 6/16/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> >>Yep, that's pretty close to what I ended up doing. I seem to
> >> recall, however, that it pulled down *all* revisions to every source
> >> file. (this was many months and a whole lot o
Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2007, at 1:19 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>> Well, yeah, it was authored by Linus Torvalds, so that's to be
>> expected. I think it's gotten a _little_ looser since then, but it's
>> still predominantly assuming a Posix-compatible environment.
>
>Not OS X or
Dave McGuire wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2007, at 1:19 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>>>It was not compilation time. I'm not running Linux on a PC, and
>>> apparently the git authors think (or thought) that "all the world's a
>>> Linux PC".
>> Well, yeah, it was authored by Linus Torvalds, so that's t
On 6/15/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Oh My. :) Is it a performance issue?
Nope -- we have a fast enough LAN to handle it. But, can you imagine
the sheer constancy of needing to re-synchronize against the
repository for commonly edited files? :)
--
Samuel A. Falvo II
On Jun 16, 2007, at 1:19 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>>It was not compilation time. I'm not running Linux on a PC, and
>> apparently the git authors think (or thought) that "all the world's a
>> Linux PC".
>
> Well, yeah, it was authored by Linus Torvalds, so that's to be
> expected. I thin
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>>Yep, that's pretty close to what I ended up doing. I seem to
>> recall, however, that it pulled down *all* revisions to every source
>> file. (this was many months and a whole lot of stressful times ago,
>> so my memory of this is fuzzy)
>
>
On Saturday 16 June 2007 06:08:36 Dave McGuire wrote:
>Yep, that's pretty close to what I ended up doing. I seem to
> recall, however, that it pulled down *all* revisions to every source
> file. (this was many months and a whole lot of stressful times ago,
> so my memory of this is fuzzy)
>
On 6/15/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>It was not compilation time. I'm not running Linux on a PC, and
> apparently the git authors think (or thought) that "all the world's a
> Linux PC".
Well, yeah, it was authored by Linus Torvalds, so that's to be
expected. I think it's gott
On Jun 16, 2007, at 1:04 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>>Fortunately, gperf is an easy one to deal with. And damn cool to
>> *use*, too...I've used it in a number of projects and it has been
>> fantastic.
>
> I did not even know it existed until just now.
>
> It's said that GCC uses gperf for
On Jun 16, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>>After I got it built (which took most of an afternoon), it took
>
> Huh? git took 15 minutes to build completely, from scratch, on my box
> (800MHz Athlon, Slot A, EV6 bus motherboard).
It was not compilation time. I'm not running L
On 6/15/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Fortunately, gperf is an easy one to deal with. And damn cool to
> *use*, too...I've used it in a number of projects and it has been
> fantastic.
I did not even know it existed until just now.
It's said that GCC uses gperf for its keyword
On 6/15/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>After I got it built (which took most of an afternoon), it took
Huh? git took 15 minutes to build completely, from scratch, on my box
(800MHz Athlon, Slot A, EV6 bus motherboard).
>After that experience, I labeled it as "some kid's pet
On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:44 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>> I'd be happy to help. Although I'm a bit of a newbie myself, maybe a
>> fresh pair of eyes will help isolate problems better. And,
>> besides, I
>> might as well package gEDA for gobolinux too (or at least try to).
>
> Well, I worked on
On Jun 16, 2007, at 12:14 AM, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
>>Um, yuck? :-(
>
> ???
I remember having to use that mess to get the sources for
something awhile back...Was it Freetype, perhaps? I don't recall.
After I got it built (which took most of an afternoon), it took
about 40 minu
On 6/15/07, Samuel A. Falvo II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be happy to help. Although I'm a bit of a newbie myself, maybe a
> fresh pair of eyes will help isolate problems better. And, besides, I
> might as well package gEDA for gobolinux too (or at least try to).
Well, I worked on download
On 6/15/07, Dave McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Um, yuck? :-(
???
--
Samuel A. Falvo II
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
Stephen Williams wrote:
> Well, I've made my choice and I'm starting the transition over
> to using git for Icarus Verilog. I've made my personal repository
> and I've made anonymous access to it at the url:
>
>git://icarus.com/~steve-icarus/verilog
Um, yuck? :-(
-Dave
On 6/15/07, Stephen Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well then, I just started into the git instructions in the
> "Installation" section of the Icarus Verilog documentation at
> iverilog.wikia.com. If you have something to add, please do. I'm
> still flailing a bit:-/
I'd be happy to help. A
Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Stephen Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, I've made my choice and I'm starting the transition over
>> to using git for Icarus Verilog. I've made my personal repository
>> and I've made anonymous access to it at the url:
>
> Nice! I've never liked
On 6/15/07, Stephen Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I've made my choice and I'm starting the transition over
> to using git for Icarus Verilog. I've made my personal repository
> and I've made anonymous access to it at the url:
Nice! I've never liked CVS or its ilk because the workflo
Well, I've made my choice and I'm starting the transition over
to using git for Icarus Verilog. I've made my personal repository
and I've made anonymous access to it at the url:
git://icarus.com/~steve-icarus/verilog
It this repository you'll be able to *immediately* pull anything
that I push
23 matches
Mail list logo
