Peter Clifton wrote:
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 08:25 +0100, Bert Timmerman wrote:
The directories have not been merged, that is, m4 derived footprints in the
newlib format live in lib/pcblib-newlib and the newlib contains the
footprints according to the newlib format.
Confused, you won't be after
> The only benefit seen,
Is that you can use pcb on windows, which doesn't have m4.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Sun, 2007-02-11 at 08:25 +0100, Bert Timmerman wrote:
> The directories have not been merged, that is, m4 derived footprints in the
> newlib format live in lib/pcblib-newlib and the newlib contains the
> footprints according to the newlib format.
>
> Confused, you won't be after the next episo
2007 11:20
Aan: gEDA user mailing list
Onderwerp: RE: gEDA-user: LED 100 != 5mm LED ?
Hi Bert,
youre right, the "100" defines the silk not the pin distance. So 100 is a
wrong value for 5mm LEDs. Is this a bug in the m4 template ?
There seems to be no bounding box (like in the hole_m3.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens kiu
> Verzonden: zondag 11 februari 2007 0:30
> Aan: geda-user@moria.seul.org
> Onderwerp: gEDA-user: LED 100 != 5mm LED ?
>
> Hi,
>
> in geda/share/pcb/m4/optical.m4 a 5mm LED footp
ind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens kiu
Verzonden: zondag 11 februari 2007 0:30
Aan: geda-user@moria.seul.org
Onderwerp: gEDA-user: LED 100 != 5mm LED ?
Hi,
in geda/share/pcb/m4/optical.m4 a 5mm LED footprint is d
Hi,
in geda/share/pcb/m4/optical.m4 a 5mm LED footprint is defined as "LED 100". But
if i print it my LEDs are to small.
Shouldnt it be 5mm/0.0254mm = 197 mil instead ?
I am a (g)eda newbie - am i doing something wrong ?
Thanks in advance...
--
kiu
___
7 matches
Mail list logo
