Dan McMahill wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
I would have liked to use the name 'greenstone', which has special
meaning for NZ.. it is a type of jade only found here. Unfortunately
my uni supervisor has already used that name for a project:
http://www.greenstone.org/
Maybe we could call it the g
Anthony Blake wrote:
John Griessen wrote:
kai-martin knaak wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
greenlight <---
I'd strongly suggest to invent a new word rather than take an existing
buzzword. The term "greenlight" currently yields 1.5 Mio google hits.
A greenlight router wou
John Griessen wrote:
kai-martin knaak wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
greenlight <---
I'd strongly suggest to invent a new word rather than take an existing
buzzword. The term "greenlight" currently yields 1.5 Mio google hits.
A greenlight router would be almost as invisi
John Griessen wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Windell H. Oskay
wrote:
Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't want
us to be confused with.
untangler
runtangler ( route u
kai-martin knaak wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
greenlight <---
I'd strongly suggest to invent a new word rather than take an existing
buzzword. The term "greenlight" currently yields 1.5 Mio google hits.
A greenlight router would be almost as invisible to internet search
Anthony Blake wrote:
most of my work
last year was an answer to some scathing criticism from Harry.. I *had*
to do something after that =)
So, all we have to do is read the code, scratch our heads and find
critiques to make and you'll be compelled to improve it?
I may have to stay up late rea
Harry Eaton wrote:
Can you guys keep this on the geda-dev list in future.. it is always
fun
to see how things are progressing.
Certainly, if Anthony and I discuss anything now that GSoc is not to
be.
That's too bad about the Google money.
JG
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:33 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> Anthony Blake wrote:
>
>> The toporouter will already route a selection of nets if some nets are
>> selected when the toporouter is invoked.
>
> Nice!
Also, it will only route on the currently visible layers.
--
Anthony Blake
On Mar 18, 2010, at 9:15 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
> Thanks for the offer =) On the one hand, I really want to finish the
> toporouter, and its hard while I'm studying full time.. so taking a
> funded break for a few weeks to work on the toporouter seems like a
> great option. On the other hand, the
Anthony Blake wrote:
> The toporouter will already route a selection of nets if some nets are
> selected when the toporouter is invoked.
Nice!
---<(kaimartin)>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Öffentlicher PGP-Schlüssel:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 2:27 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> So let's concentrate to the most blocking of all issues:
> If I got it right, these are the inability to deal with preexisting tracks
> and the missing way to confine the router to selected nets. If these issues
> were solved, even the rou
Anthony Blake wrote:
>>> greenlight <-- Despite being the least
>>> "router-ish"
>>of these names, I really like
>>this one.
>
> Hmm.. me too..
I'd strongly suggest to invent a new w
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Windell H. Oskay wrote:
>
>> I'm not going to stop working on the toporouter (greenlight?) just
>> because Google didn't fund us. If people keep hassling me, I'll probably
>> find the time for small commits here and there.. e.g., most of my work
>> last year was an
Harry Eaton wrote:
I'm not going to stop working on the toporouter (greenlight?) just
because Google didn't fund us. If people keep hassling me, I'll
probably
find the time for small commits here and there.. e.g., most of my
work
last year was an answer to some scath
I'm not going to stop working on the toporouter (greenlight?) just
because Google didn't fund us. If people keep hassling me, I'll
probably
find the time for small commits here and there.. e.g., most of my
work
last year was an answer to some scathing criticism from Ha
> I'm not going to stop working on the toporouter (greenlight?) just
> because Google didn't fund us. If people keep hassling me, I'll probably
> find the time for small commits here and there.. e.g., most of my work
> last year was an answer to some scathing criticism from Harry.. I *had*
> to do
+1 *hassle*
(i really like toporouter :)
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Mar 18, 2010, at 7:54 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
>> Can you guys keep this on the geda-dev list in future.. it is always
>> fun
>> to see how things are progressing.
>> Certainly, if Anthony and I discuss anything now that GSoc is not to
>> be.
>
> I'm not going to stop working on
Harry Eaton wrote:
Can you guys keep this on the geda-dev list in future.. it is always
fun
to see how things are progressing.
Certainly, if Anthony and I discuss anything now that GSoc is not to
be.
I'm not going to stop working on the toporouter (greenlight?) just
becau
Can you guys keep this on the geda-dev list in future.. it is always
fun
to see how things are progressing.
Certainly, if Anthony and I discuss anything now that GSoc is not to
be.
Previously, I couldn't subscribe or send to the geda-dev list (or user
for that matter). T
Peter Clifton wrote:
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 11:14 -0500, John Griessen wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Windell H. Oskay wrote:
Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't want
u
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 11:14 -0500, John Griessen wrote:
> Anthony Blake wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Windell H. Oskay
> > wrote:
> >>> Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
> >>> already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't want
> >>
Anthony Blake wrote:
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Windell H. Oskay wrote:
Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't want
us to be confused with.
untangler
runtangler ( route untangler)
grouter
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 17:09 +1300, Anthony Blake wrote:
> > Who's going to "mentor" you for GSOC purposes?
>
> Since Harry Eaton has never been shy with lots of really good criticism
> and comments regarding the toporouter (off list), I asked if he would be
> interested a few weeks ago..
Can y
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Anthony Blake
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:14 PM
> To: wind...@oskay.net; gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Toporouter update
John Griessen wrote:
I guess the last thing the CAD companies want is a straight comparison.
We might be able to setup a system where people can anonymously post
results generated with commercial tools, sort of like how deepchip.com
works.
Who's going to "mentor" you for GSOC purposes?
S
Anthony Blake wrote:
btw, those toporouter guys are rather misleading with their results..
they show off pictures of boards which have been fixed up afterwards..
e.g., "20 mins of toporouter time, and 40 mins of hand editing" for
one of their boards.
That kind of partial route performance still
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Windell H. Oskay wrote:
>
>>> Haha nice.. "I used to route boards by hand, but then I became
>>> awesome instead. True story."
>>
>> tea -> keyboard
>
> I suggest it because (1) it's awesome and (2) it's suggestive of
> 'autorouter."
>
>
> Back on topic now, w
>> Haha nice.. "I used to route boards by hand, but then I became
>> awesome instead. True story."
>
>tea -> keyboard
I suggest it because (1) it's awesome and (2) it's suggestive of
'autorouter."
Back on topic now, we might get some good hints for future features from
Toporouter (the co
On 03/17/2010 08:24 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
Anthony Blake wrote:
btw, if there are other little projects or features you would like to
add..
design rules that depend on the net, ...
+1, for my work.
-Ethan
___
geda-user mailing list
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:24 PM, kai-martin knaak wrote:
> Anthony Blake wrote:
>
>> btw, if there are other little projects or features you would like to
>> add..
>
> Last time I checked, there were some real show-stoppers. E.g, the topo
> router would choke on preexisting tracks. I'd rather see
Anthony Blake wrote:
> btw, if there are other little projects or features you would like to
> add..
Last time I checked, there were some real show-stoppers. E.g, the topo
router would choke on preexisting tracks. I'd rather see these major issues
resolved than divert energy toward added featur
On Mar 17, 2010, at 8:17 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't
want
us to be confused with.
How about Awesomerouter? :D
Haha nice.. "I used to route boards by hand, but
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Windell H. Oskay wrote:
>> Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
>> already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't want
>> us to be confused with.
>
>
> How about Awesomerouter? :D
Haha nice.. "I used to route board
> Also, can anyone think of a new name for the toporouter? There is
> already a commercial tool called the 'toporouter', which I don't want
> us to be confused with.
How about Awesomerouter? :D
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
htt
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 4:48 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:10:29 -0500, Ethan Swint wrote:
>
>> On 02/23/2010 06:46 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
Ok, then. Can you compile a list of tasks that need to be accomplished
before the topo router is ready for general use?
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:10:29 -0500, Ethan Swint wrote:
> On 02/23/2010 06:46 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
>>> Ok, then. Can you compile a list of tasks that need to be accomplished
>>> before the topo router is ready for general use? The smaler the
>>> individual tasks, the more likely they can be tac
On 02/23/2010 06:46 PM, Anthony Blake wrote:
Ok, then. Can you compile a list of tasks that need to be
accomplished before the topo router is ready for general use? The
smaler the individual tasks, the more likely they can be tackled by
low time hackers like me...
For sure. It would require som
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:45 +1300, Anthony Blake wrote:
I don't get a lot of time atm.. please jump in =)
Ok, then. Can you compile a list of tasks that need to be accomplished
before the topo router is ready for general use? The smaler the
individual tasks, the mor
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:16:45 +1300, Anthony Blake wrote:
> I don't get a lot of time atm.. please jump in =)
Ok, then. Can you compile a list of tasks that need to be accomplished
before the topo router is ready for general use? The smaler the
individual tasks, the more likely they can be tackl
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Larry Battraw wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Anthony Blake <[1]tony...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Ethan Swint wrote:
>
> The last update on the toporouter looks like it was last June. Any
> news since then, or is it waiting for me to jump in
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Anthony Blake <[1]tony...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Ethan Swint wrote:
The last update on the toporouter looks like it was last June. Any
news since then, or is it waiting for me to jump in to the code? ;)
It looks fantastic.
I don't get a
Ethan Swint wrote:
The last update on the toporouter looks like it was last June. Any news
since then, or is it waiting for me to jump in to the code? ;) It looks
fantastic.
I don't get a lot of time atm.. please jump in =)
FWIW - I think a better metric of router performance (instead of to
Hi-
The last update on the toporouter looks like it was last June. Any news
since then, or is it waiting for me to jump in to the code? ;) It looks
fantastic.
FWIW - I think a better metric of router performance (instead of total
track length as used on the web page
http://www.wand.net.nz
44 matches
Mail list logo
