On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 01:39:02AM +0100, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 00:15 +0400, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> > The symbols are nice, but there are special state standards in Russia
> > about what should they look like.
>
> If you can get hold of a copy of the standard for us to lo
On Thu, 2011-09-01 at 00:15 +0400, Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:08:08PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > ?? wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, I am sorry. I just tried to say the links are wrong, that is they
> > > don't point to appropriate footprints.
> > >
> >
> > If
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 03:08:08PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> ?? wrote:
>
> > Oh, I am sorry. I just tried to say the links are wrong, that is they
> > don't point to appropriate footprints.
> >
>
> If I didn't introduce new errors, they should be fine now. Thanks again
> for
?? wrote:
> Oh, I am sorry. I just tried to say the links are wrong, that is they
> don't point to appropriate footprints.
>
If I didn't introduce new errors, they should be fine now. Thanks again
for checking!
Any comments on the symbols themselves?
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-M
2011/8/31 DJ Delorie :
> Note that the links give you the *wrong* symbol though. The link
> doesn't match the visible text.
Oh, I am sorry. I just tried to say the links are wrong, that is they
don't point to appropriate footprints.
--
VZh
___
geda-
> > Some links at
> >
> > http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/essential.html
> > seem to be broken:
> > > href="http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/symbols/titleblock/in.sym";>out.sym
> > > href="http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_marti
Vladimir Zhbanov wrote:
> Some links at
>
> http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/essential.html
> seem to be broken:
>href="http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/symbols/titleblock/in.sym";>out.sym
>href="http://www.gedasymbols.org/
Some links at
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/essential.html
seem to be broken:
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/symbols/titleblock/in.sym";>out.sym
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/kai_martin_knaak/essential/symbols/discr
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:23:09 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> This of course implies heavy symbols. In fact, I made them super
> heavy by adding an attribute with a comma separated list of
> footprints. So dear light library lovers: This is explicitly not for
> you ;-)
First, I'll say that I am a
Hi.
Like promised during the last big library discussion, I started to
assemble a library that is designed to be useful for first time users.
It should allow to build simple projects and demonstrate good practice.
This of course implies heavy symbols. In fact, I made them super heavy
by adding a
10 matches
Mail list logo
