Re: gEDA-user: geda-user attachment policy ?, was: Re: Breaking a track into two segments by using a hole

On 13/11/2008, Ales Hvezda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I put one sentence on the mailing list main page clarifying the > policy. It's pretty lax: > > Sending small binary attachments to any of the the gEDA lists > is okay as long as they are relevant to gEDA. > > Basic

Re: gEDA-user: geda-user attachment policy ?, was: Re: Breaking a track into two segments by using a hole

[snip] >I couldn't find any clear reference about geda-user's attachment >policy either in the introduction email or on the mailing list web >page, so I sent these files to Peter privately. > >Could one of the list's maintainers clarify the policy on attachments, >with reference to what types (tex

Re: gEDA-user: geda-user attachment policy ?, was: Re: Breaking a track into two segments by using a hole

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:18:48AM +, Simon Clubley wrote: > I couldn't find any clear reference about geda-user's attachment > policy either in the introduction email or on the mailing list web > page, so I sent these files to Peter privately. > > Could one of the list's maintainers clarify t

gEDA-user: geda-user attachment policy ?, was: Re: Breaking a track into two segments by using a hole

On 11/11/2008, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 13:41 +, Simon Clubley wrote: > > On 11/11/2008, Peter Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps you could post that as an example, or make some screen-shots > > > available on the web somewhere? I