On Jan 3, 2007, at 2:12 PM, Hans Nieuwenhuis wrote:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:32:19 -0700
Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Hans Nieuwenhuis wrote:
Sorry for me jumping in, but I remembered a situation a while ago
having the same problem also. The cause of the pr
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:32:19 -0700
Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Hans Nieuwenhuis wrote:
>
> > Sorry for me jumping in, but I remembered a situation a while ago
> > having the same problem also. The cause of the problem is the
> > dashes in
> > the filename
On Jan 3, 2007, at 10:54 AM, John Luciani wrote:
On 1/3/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've spent all evening screwing with this ... trying various
>> combinations of different footprints, changing attributes using
>> gattrib or editing the symbols (either in emacs or using
gs
On 1/3/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've spent all evening screwing with this ... trying various
>> combinations of different footprints, changing attributes using
>> gattrib or editing the symbols (either in emacs or using gschem) and
>> I can't get it to work.
>
> You may want
On Jan 3, 2007, at 8:03 AM, Hans Nieuwenhuis wrote:
Sorry for me jumping in, but I remembered a situation a while ago
having the same problem also. The cause of the problem is the
dashes in
the filename of the footprint. If the OP had not used multiple dashes
there would not have been a probl
On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:14 AM, John Luciani wrote:
On 1/3/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 8:28 PM, John Luciani wrote:
> On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:59 PM, John Luciani wrote:
>>
>> > On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 07:14:54 -0500
"John Luciani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Loaded into pcb directly, or brought in when used as a footprint
> > attribute attached to a symbol?
> >
> > Now I can't get ANY footprint to load from the symbol.
>
> I am using gsch2pcb version 1.4
>
> Check
On 1/3/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 8:28 PM, John Luciani wrote:
> On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:59 PM, John Luciani wrote:
>>
>> > On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> So I think that my footprint is
On Jan 2, 2007, at 8:28 PM, John Luciani wrote:
On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:59 PM, John Luciani wrote:
> On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I think that my footprint is broken, but I dunno how or why!
>>
>> -a
>
> If your footprin
On Jan 2, 2007, at 8:28 PM, John Luciani wrote:
On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:59 PM, John Luciani wrote:
> On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I think that my footprint is broken, but I dunno how or why!
>>
>> -a
>
> If your footprin
On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:59 PM, John Luciani wrote:
> On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> So I think that my footprint is broken, but I dunno how or why!
>>
>> -a
>
> If your footprint is a simple newlib footprint you may want to pos
FWIW, here's the input file for footgen.py:
# PCB footprints
# Convert to newlib by using footgen.py
# This file is not copyrighted
# You may use these footprints as you wish.
# There is no guarantee that the data is accurate
# check the datasheets for you components
# S
Looks OK to me.
> Element[0x00 "SOT223-230P-650W-356L-4N" "" "" 0 0 0 0 0 100 0x00]
> (
> Pad[-9055 11418 -9055 13386 3937 1200 4537 "1" "1" 0x0100]
> Pad[0 11418 0 13386 3937 1200 4537 "2" "2" 0x0100]
> Pad[ 9055 11418 9055 13386 3937 1200 4537 "3" "3" 0x
On Jan 2, 2007, at 7:59 PM, John Luciani wrote:
On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I think that my footprint is broken, but I dunno how or why!
-a
If your footprint is a simple newlib footprint you may want to post
it.
Actually, I did, in the message that started this thr
On 1/2/07, Andy Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So I think that my footprint is broken, but I dunno how or why!
-a
If your footprint is a simple newlib footprint you may want to post
it.
(* jcl *)
--
http://www.luciani.org
___
geda-user mailing
On Jan 2, 2007, at 6:01 PM, John Griessen wrote:
Andy Peters wrote:
Happy New Year, gang ...
I tried to run gsch2pcb to get the PCB files, using:
$ andy$ gsch2pcb -v --use-files --elements-dir /Users/andy/
Library/gEDA/pcb power.sch > gs.txt
and I get an odd failure. The three components on t
> However, if I run "$gsch2pcb project" where the contents of the file project
> are:
>
> schematics one.sch two.sch three.sch four.sch
> output-name my_project
My (working!) project file looks like this:
m4-pcbdir /envy/dj/geda/share/pcb/m4
elements-dir /envy/dj/geda/gedasymbols/www/user/dj_de
>If I change
> > the footprint to something in John's library (anything, it doesn't
> > matter), the component is processed properly and the footprint is found.
> >
> > So, what causes gsch2pcb to crap out like this?
> Have you got a file in the local dir called gafrc
> with contents like:
> li
Andy Peters wrote:
Happy New Year, gang ...
I tried to run gsch2pcb to get the PCB files, using:
$ andy$ gsch2pcb -v --use-files --elements-dir
/Users/andy/Library/gEDA/pcb power.sch > gs.txt
and I get an odd failure. The three components on the schematic that
use footprints in my li
Happy New Year, gang ...
Here's an odd problem. I'm on Mac OS X 10.4.8, using the latest fink
release.
I've created a handful of symbols with footprint attributes
attached. I've also created a couple of newlib footprint using
Darrell Harmon's footgen; the relevant one here is an SOT223.
20 matches
Mail list logo
