On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 21:10 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 19:55 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> >
> > Attached is a minimal test case distilled from your board.. it was
>
> Thanks.
>
> But please note: The tut1.pcb shipped with pcb crashed also when pcb was
> compiled wi
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 19:55 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> Attached is a minimal test case distilled from your board.. it was
Thanks.
But please note: The tut1.pcb shipped with pcb crashed also when pcb was
compiled with debug option and "O" key is used for optimize.
For my large board proble
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 15:01 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:48 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
>
> > > >
> > > > Does debug option work for other people? Or should we never use it?
> >
> > I've had trouble with the "debug" option before, but it is probably
> > telling us som
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 13:48 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > >
> > > Does debug option work for other people? Or should we never use it?
>
> I've had trouble with the "debug" option before, but it is probably
> telling us something useful.
>
> Your board works fine without the debug option, righ
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 00:43 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 23:16 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> >
> > This may be related to my box -- AMD64, gcc 4.4.2 glib 2.11 and strong
> > optimizing compiler:
> > CFLAGS="-march=native -msse3 -O2 -floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine
On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 00:43 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 23:16 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> CFLAGS="-march=k8 -O2 -pipe"
>
> building for gtk, with otions doc and debug, but no toporouter support.
>
> This is again gcc4.4.2, glibc-2.11 on AMD64 (I can not change thi
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 23:16 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> This may be related to my box -- AMD64, gcc 4.4.2 glib 2.11 and strong
> optimizing compiler:
> CFLAGS="-march=native -msse3 -O2 -floop-interchange -floop-strip-mine
> -floop-block -pipe"
>
> But other software works fine.
>
> Does
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 23:03 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> And with
>
> AMD64-X2 ~ # USE="toporouter doc examples debug" emerge -av pcb
>
> I get for my board from
>
> http://www.ssalewski.de/DAD.html.en
>
> ste...@amd64-x2 /mnt/data/stefan/gEDA/DAD $ pcb b1.pcb
> pcb: polygon1.c:478: node_
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 21:26 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 21:47 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> > Can someone confirm that "free (&pd);" is fine here?
>
> No, it is a bug which we've already fixed upstream. The
On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 21:47 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Can someone confirm that "free (&pd);" is fine here?
No, it is a bug which we've already fixed upstream. The required patch
is to change this to "free (pd);"
Best wishes,
Pete
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
Building for open-motif we get
hid/lesstif/main.c:3707: warning: attempt to free a non-heap object ‘pd’
related to this source text.
pd = (PinoutData *) MyCalloc (1, sizeof (PinoutData), "lesstif_show_item");
pd->item = item;
ex
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 17:47 +, Ineiev wrote:
>
> Very nice reports (see attachment).
>
Thanks for your support.
Just testing batch mode -- seems to work fine now.
But we have again these batch.c warnings
* QA Notice: Package has poor programming practices which may compile
*
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 17:47 +, Ineiev wrote:
> > hid/gtk/gui-dialog.c:172: warning: format not a string literal and no
> > format arguments
>
> Should be like it is: the function semantics differ from the printf() ones.
The correct fix for any bug sprewing this message is usually to pass th
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 18:26 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 16:51 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> >
> > > --docdir="/usr/share/doc/pcb-20091103"
> > > seems to generate an obsolete empty directory
> > > /usr/share/pc
Stefan Salewski wrote:
> autoroute.c:3431: warning: ‘add_clearance’ defined but not used
> djopt.c:2461: warning: ‘nudge_corner’ defined but not used
> draw.c:381: warning: passing argument 3 of ‘DrawSilk’ discards qualifiers
> from pointer target type
> file.c:1129: warning: ignoring return valu
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 16:51 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>
> > --docdir="/usr/share/doc/pcb-20091103"
> > seems to generate an obsolete empty directory
> > /usr/share/pcb-20091103/
>
> That directory is somewhat of an annoyance on my box.
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> --docdir="/usr/share/doc/pcb-20091103"
> seems to generate an obsolete empty directory
> /usr/share/pcb-20091103/
That directory is somewhat of an annoyance on my box..
> For gentoo we like to have examples and tutorials in the doc
>
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 17:27 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > > We have --enable-toporouter-output now.
> > > It needs cairo. Is this true for lesstif HID too.
> >
> > I believe this is a debugging option, and distros should not be building
> > with it enabled.
> >
>
> OH -- I was going to mak
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 15:53 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > Two questions:
> >
> > ste...@amd64-x2 ~/pcb/pcb-20091103 $ ./configure --help |grep lpr
> > --with-printer= Specify the printer: lpr [default=lpr]
> > I think lpr is the o
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:07 +0100, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> Two questions:
>
> ste...@amd64-x2 ~/pcb/pcb-20091103 $ ./configure --help |grep lpr
> --with-printer= Specify the printer: lpr [default=lpr]
> I think lpr is the only available choice, and I read that leaving this
> option out gi
On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 14:15 +0100, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> > For gentoo we like to have examples and tutorials in the doc
> > directories, so gentoo developers employ these patches:
> > # sed -i -e 's/example//' -e 's/tutorial//' -e 's
On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> For gentoo we like to have examples and tutorials in the doc
> directories, so gentoo developers employ these patches:
> # sed -i -e 's/example//' -e 's/tutorial//' -e 's/ win32//' Makefile.in
> || die "sed failed"
> # sed -i -e
Two questions:
ste...@amd64-x2 ~/pcb/pcb-20091103 $ ./configure --help |grep lpr
--with-printer= Specify the printer: lpr [default=lpr]
I think lpr is the only available choice, and I read that leaving this
option out gives us all available printers. So I think we should not
specify this
23 matches
Mail list logo
