Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> b) The names of the copper groups in
> File -> Preferences -> Groups
>
> c) The help text in
> File -> Preferences -> Info
patch atttached for the preference dialog
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak, Email: k...@familieknaak.de
http://pool.sks-keyservers.net:1
On 09/18/2011 09:01 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
This patch replaces "component" and "solder" in the leftmost item of the
status line of the GTK HID with "top" and "bottom".
Thanks for work to improve the GUI Kai-Martin.
JG
___
geda-user mailing lis
DJ Delorie wrote:
> From the user's point of view, we use top/bottom [hopefully]
> consistently.
There are at least three places in the GTK-GUI that still expose
"solder/component":
a) The first item on the left in the status line, which gives a
hint on the side the canvas shows. (patch attac
On 09/18/2011 08:16 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
> You're +1'ing something we already have,
Whoops.
On 09/18/2011 08:16 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
So... go get the release and test it
OK. There's another unfinished/overdue project on my to do list...
I will attempt to swap sleep/insomnia for executing p
> > DJ's clarification aside, I would vote for "top/bottom", with each
> > of those symbolically being placed in the list. That is, for an
> > 8-layer default: Top, Layer 2, Layer 3, ..., Layer 7, Bottom
>
> +1
You're +1'ing something we already have, and not what Kai was taking
about. From th
On 09/18/2011 07:56 PM, Vanessa Ezekowitz wrote:
DJ's clarification aside, I would vote for "top/bottom", with each of those
symbolically being placed in the list. That is, for an 8-layer default: Top, Layer 2,
Layer 3, ..., Layer 7, Bottom
+1
JG
__
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 01:24:51 +0200
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again.
> It just won't stick with me, that "solder" is supposed to be a synonym
> to "top".
DJ's clarification aside, I would vote for "top/bottom", with each of those
s
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 08:47:36PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > Still unhappy with moderation of geda-user.
> > Why? Because it is completely intransparent.
>
> Please do not mix your political agenda with technical questions.
>
In Kai's defense, his message was in his signature, which
is cle
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:24:51AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again.
> It just won't stick with me, that "solder" is supposed to be a synonym
> to "top". I addressed the issue before about a year ago:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gm
> It just won't stick with me, that "solder" is supposed to be a
> synonym to "top".
Good, because "solder" is a synonym for "bottom". ;-)
> Still unhappy with moderation of geda-user.
> Why? Because it is completely intransparent.
Please do not mix your political agenda with technical questi
Just got fooled by the classic solder/component vs top/bottom, again.
It just won't stick with me, that "solder" is supposed to be a synonym
to "top". I addressed the issue before about a year ago:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/31354/focus=31356
Consensus seemed to be that top/b
11 matches
Mail list logo
