El lun, 09-07-2007 a las 11:56 +, Kai-Martin Knaak escribió:
> If er is pressed while a copy hovers at the mouse, the copy is discarded
> and the selection rotated. The intuitive behaviour would be to rotate the
> copy and leave the original untouched.
>
> Along the same line: er while move
If er is pressed while a copy hovers at the mouse, the copy is discarded
and the selection rotated. The intuitive behaviour would be to rotate the
copy and leave the original untouched.
Along the same line: er while move with m is active, currently ends move
node and places a rotated version o
Currently, there is no immediate feedback on the state of rubber band
mode or outline/box. Please include this information into the status
line. Alternatively, show the current state in the menu with a check
mark, like the settings menu in pcb does.
---<(kaimartin)>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:14:53 -0400, Ales Hvezda wrote:
> I've added a (junction-color ...) rc keyword to the light and dark
> background color schemes. For the dark scheme, the default junction
> color is yellow. For the light scheme, the default junction color is
> purple.
So I can easily set t
[snip]
>As I think someone else suggested, why not bus green (color 10)? I don't
>have time to work out how to do this, but I'm happy to check and commit
>a patch.
I've added a (junction-color ...) rc keyword to the light and dark background
color schemes. For the dark scheme, the default ju
El mié, 04-07-2007 a las 22:08 +0200, Carlos Nieves Ónega escribió:
> However, I tested it before posting, and it is not currently working.
> The reason is that world_get_single_object_bounds is returning something
> like left=100 right=120 bottom=395 top=405 for an horizontal net, when
> some time
El mié, 04-07-2007 a las 10:09 +, Kai-Martin Knaak escribió:
> My list of wishes and complaints still contains a load of items. If you
> don't mind, I'll go on posting them in this thread. Next one is:
>
>
> Currently, the letters of a new netname attribute touch the corr
Werner Hoch wrote:
> I didn't know about this feature and thus I wondered whether it is part
> of the documentation or whether I should add it.
>
> And surprise:
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:gschem_ug#attribute..._aa
I've been using it, but did not know about the possible gain from moving
Hi all,
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 19:40, John Doty wrote:
> On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > In case of "aa": How does gschem know, which net the netname
> > attribute should be logically attached to?
>
> It attaches the attribute to the selected net. It places the
> attrib
On Jul 4, 2007, at 11:27 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:49:59 -0600, John Doty wrote:
>
>> The attribute goes wherever the cursor is. Just move the cursor to
>> where
>> you want it before "aa".
>
> Hmm. If I want to attach a netname to a specific net, I usually select
> t
> In case of "aa": How does gschem know, which net the netname
> attribute should be logically attached to?
Click on the net to select it. Put the mouse cursor where you want
the attribute. Hit "aa".
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.o
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 06:49:59 -0600, John Doty wrote:
> The attribute goes wherever the cursor is. Just move the cursor to where
> you want it before "aa".
Hmm. If I want to attach a netname to a specific net, I usually select
the net and do "ee". The hot spot of the resulting attribute string wi
Hi Kai-Martin,
On Wednesday 04 July 2007 13:35, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Some dialogs don't define which button will be accessed by the return
> key. I spotted two such dialogs:
> 1) "Single Attribute Editor"
> 2) "Edit Attributes"
> Please make the ok/close button default.
This is onl
On Jul 4, 2007, at 4:09 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>
>
> Currently, the letters of a new netname attribute touch the
> corresponding
> net. Please place the attribute at a decent distance (e.g. 50 units
> offset).
>
The attribute goes wherever the cur
Some dialogs don't define which button will be accessed by the return
key. I spotted two such dialogs:
1) "Single Attribute Editor"
2) "Edit Attributes"
Please make the ok/close button default.
---<(kaimartin)>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak tel: +49-511-762-
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 11:31:19 +0100, peter-rDcdRWvjh1wqdlJmJB21zg wrote:
>> PS: My feature requests have been deleted from the BTS.
>
> They haven't -- they've been moved to the "Feature Requests" part of the
> bug tracker system.
Oups. Sorry for the inconvenience. I was ignorant of this sourcef
This is yet another feature request for gschem move:
Currently connections can break on move under certain conditions,
although rubberband option is active. This happens, if the connection is
direct and "netless" between pins.
Suggestion: Add a net if a connection threatens to break during mo
> PS: My feature requests have been deleted from the BTS. So I'll stop
> posting them there.
They haven't -- they've been moved to the "Feature Requests" part of the
bug tracker system. I did it.
Please please do continue putting them in the tracker!
Thanks,
Peter :)
__
Currently, rubberband move may lead to skewed nets. This is most probably
not the desired shape of. Please add an option to restrict nets to
rectangular style on rubberband move and make this the default. Add a
perpendicular net if necessary, just like it is done with manual drawn
nets.
---<(k
My list of wishes and complaints still contains a load of items. If you
don't mind, I'll go on posting them in this thread. Next one is:
Currently, the letters of a new netname attribute touch the corresponding
net. Please place the attribute at a decent distance (e.g. 50 un
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 13:32:11 -0500, John Griessen wrote:
> I also like the convention of crossing wires like:
>
>
>|
>|
> ---o-o-
> |
> |
>
If pins are involved, a simple three wire junction currently looks
ambiguous too. The correctly connect
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:10:36 +, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> sometimes I want to break connections on move of a symbol or selection.
> I wish, there was a modifier to the move short cut that would do the
> trick. How about [shift-m] and [shift] while the mouse moves?
Just discovered the option "
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 02:02:42PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> How about a circle at a junction, and an X at an unconnected net end?
I like that. I even made a symbol with a pin and an 'X' to put on
intentionally unused pins of chips and headers. If I could just drag
a short wire off the pin a
On 7/3/07, Ales Hvezda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How about a circle at a junction, and an X at an unconnected net end?
> >
>
> Actually for a while there gschem did exactly that, however, based on
> user feedback (at the time) this functionality was unused and
> subequently removed.
>
> Right
> How about a circle at a junction, and an X at an unconnected net end?
>
Actually for a while there gschem did exactly that, however, based on
user feedback (at the time) this functionality was unused and
subequently removed.
Right now the filled rectangle and filled circle are controlled via a
DJ Delorie wrote:
> How about a circle at a junction, and an X at an unconnected net end?
X at an unconnected net end has good intuitive meaning to me.
I also like the convention of crossing wires like:
|
|
---o-o-
|
|
I'd like that to be t
How about a circle at a junction, and an X at an unconnected net end?
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Tuesday 03 July 2007 15:38:08 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:32:10 +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> >> Connected nodes should use the net color. It's color should depend on
> >> the color scheme.
> >
> > No -- it'll make it too difficult to tell whether two nets connect or
> > ju
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:31:20 +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> Then the workflow would be:
>
> 1. Down symbol. If it's possible to edit the original library symbol,
> you have the option to; otherwise it opens the embedded version for
> editing.
>
> 2. Save symbol. If you're editing the embedded
On Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:32:10 +0100, Peter TB Brett wrote:
>> Connected nodes should use the net color. It's color should depend on
>> the color scheme.
>>
> No -- it'll make it too difficult to tell whether two nets connect or
> just cross.
Well, me thinks, a decently sized circle at a junction w
Hi Peter and all,
We could use green or yellow for the dot (connected) or red for the
square (not connected).
Kind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
BTW: We can't help the color blind in any other way than making the
difference clear by using different shapes.
On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 19:32 +0100, Peter T
Hi all,
FWIW,
About content:
If pcb only had thumbnail images generated for every footprint in the
way done in John Luciani's footprints index.
The thumbnail images for footprints distributed with pcb could be
created during build/install-time before run-time.
Newly made footprint thumbnail image
On Monday 02 July 2007 19:05:02 Werner Hoch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Monday 02 July 2007 19:53, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> > On Monday 02 July 2007 18:09:41 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > > Suggestion: Draw connected nodes in black. That way, unconnected
> > > net ends will stand out. This is a good thing
On Monday 02 July 2007 18:24:03 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> If a symbol was changed after "down-symbol" these changese very likely
> are intended to propagate to the current schematic. Currently, this
> involves manual interaction by the user:
> a) save symbol
> b) do "up-symbol"
> c) select the affe
Hi all,
On Monday 02 July 2007 19:53, Peter TB Brett wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 18:09:41 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > Suggestion: Draw connected nodes in black. That way, unconnected
> > net ends will stand out. This is a good thing, since this is almost
> > certainly not deliberate.
>
> Doesn
On Monday 02 July 2007 18:21:01 John Doty wrote:
> >
> > A footprint preview would be nice for symbols already in the schematic
> > too. Maybe a command that pops a little graphic for a currently
> > selected
> > symbol...
>
> This is a huge job, since gEDA supports many different printed
> circui
On Monday 02 July 2007 18:09:41 Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Currently, an open end of a net looks very close to a successfully
> connected node. (Little red square / Little red circle). This can be
> confusing if the net is supposed to end at a place, where two pins meet.
> The situation will look al
Hi Kai-Martin,
On Monday 02 July 2007 15:10, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> The third wish on my list:
>
> The rubber band move of gschem selections is a good default choice.
> But sometimes I want to break connections on move of a symbol or
> selection. I wish, there was a modifier to the move short c
If a symbol was changed after "down-symbol" these changese very likely
are intended to propagate to the current schematic. Currently, this
involves manual interaction by the user:
a) save symbol
b) do "up-symbol"
c) select the affected symbols
d) do "update symbols"
Step c) is particular error p
On Jul 2, 2007, at 7:00 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Second entry from my book of wishes:
>
>
> If a symbol contains a footprint attribute, the gschem library dialog
> should give a preview. I know, this is only useful with "heavy"
> symbols
> and willl be frowned at b
Currently, an open end of a net looks very close to a successfully
connected node. (Little red square / Little red circle). This can be
confusing if the net is supposed to end at a place, where two pins meet.
The situation will look almost the same if it misses the joint of the
pins.
Suggestio
The third wish on my list:
The rubber band move of gschem selections is a good default choice. But
sometimes I want to break connections on move of a symbol or selection. I
wish, there was a modifier to the move short cut that would do the trick.
How about [shift-m] and [shift] while the mouse
Second entry from my book of wishes:
If a symbol contains a footprint attribute, the gschem library dialog
should give a preview. I know, this is only useful with "heavy" symbols
and willl be frowned at by the proponents of light symbols. But wasn't
geda supposed to su
First of all, let me give big THANKS to the developers of geda/gaf and
pcb. This combo of applications is already better suited to do my kind of
job than eagle would :-)
I just submitted a medium sized analog project to the pcb fab (eight
opamps, oscillators, vco, phase detector, filters etc).
44 matches
Mail list logo
