Re: gEDA-user: yet another breadboard adapter

2008-07-07 Thread Eric Winsor
I've done the same thing with SMT .100 dual row headers and sockets. The .100 headers fit a piece of FR4 nicely down the middle. I solder the header pins to pads on either side of the PCB. Then I solder the SMT legs of the header to the socket. What works best are the old sockets made for r

Re: gEDA-user: yet another breadboard adapter

2008-07-04 Thread DJ Delorie
> Interesting concept. It solves the "covered breadboard wire" > problem pretty nicely. I might try something like this. Another advantage is that it creates a pseudo-I-beam, so removing it is less risky - there's almost no flex in the foot board. OTOH you can't run wires over the chip, becaus

Re: gEDA-user: yet another breadboard adapter

2008-07-04 Thread DJ Delorie
> It strikes me that you could also do this as two boards, an > interposer that has a row of pins on 0.300 centers, and dual-row > header socket down the middle. I thought of this, but didn't have the sockets, so I designed it for what I had on-hand. Plus, I don't have the luxury of plated holes

Re: gEDA-user: yet another breadboard adapter

2008-07-04 Thread Dave N6NZ
DJ Delorie wrote: > Something different this time around - it's vertical! Interesting concept. It solves the "covered breadboard wire" problem pretty nicely. I might try something like this. It strikes me that you could also do this as two boards, an interposer that has a row of pins on 0.300

gEDA-user: yet another breadboard adapter

2008-07-04 Thread DJ Delorie
Something different this time around - it's vertical! http://www.delorie.com/electronics/m16c-26-adapter/ ___ geda-user mailing list geda-user@moria.seul.org http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user