Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 2:41 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:14:28 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: >> that's crap.  fix the package or at least work around it: >> LDFLAGS=`echo ${LDFLAGS}` >> >> we shouldnt be forced to add random hacks throughout the tree because >> of one or two random

[gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-13 Thread Ryan Hill
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010 00:14:28 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > that's crap. fix the package or at least work around it: > LDFLAGS=`echo ${LDFLAGS}` > > we shouldnt be forced to add random hacks throughout the tree because > of one or two random broken packages Yes, I meant don't commit it until so

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-libs/linux-fusion

2010-08-13 Thread Michael Sterrett
# Michael Sterrett (13 Aug 2010) # Mask for removal 20100913 # Doesn't work with newer kernels (Bug 316869) dev-libs/linux-fusion

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:11:42 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: >> Could someone guide me to add --hash-style=gnu to default/linux/amd64/dev >> profile? I don't want to break anything > > The thing is, you can't right now. :D  LDFLAGS don't stack, mean

[gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-13 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:43:35 -0600 Ryan Hill wrote: > The thing is, you can't right now. :D LDFLAGS don't stack, meaning you'd > have to do something like > > --- targets/developer/make.defaults 26 Jul 2010 19:15:05 - 1.9 > +++ targets/developer/make.defaults 14 Aug 2010 03:31

[gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-13 Thread Ryan Hill
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:11:42 +0300 Markos Chandras wrote: > Could someone guide me to add --hash-style=gnu to default/linux/amd64/dev > profile? I don't want to break anything The thing is, you can't right now. :D LDFLAGS don't stack, meaning you'd have to do something like --- targets/develop

Re: [gentoo-dev] keepdir /var/run/package/?

2010-08-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> for people who do wish to improve their init.d scripts, recreating a >> dir is easy if your init.d runs after localmount: >> [ ! -d /var/run/foo ] && install -d -m 755 -o fowner -g fgroup /var/run

Re: [gentoo-dev] keepdir /var/run/package/?

2010-08-13 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2010, Mike Frysinger wrote: > for people who do wish to improve their init.d scripts, recreating a > dir is easy if your init.d runs after localmount: > [ ! -d /var/run/foo ] && install -d -m 755 -o fowner -g fgroup /var/run/foo Why not "checkpath -d -o fowner:fgroup -m 0755

Re: [gentoo-dev] keepdir /var/run/package/?

2010-08-13 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:40:31 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eray Aslan wrote: > > On 08/12/2010 09:48 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > >> It says "Files under this directory", not "Files and directories > >> under this directory." > > > > Fair enough. > > > > So our po

Re: [gentoo-dev] keepdir /var/run/package/?

2010-08-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > for people who do wish to improve their init.d scripts, recreating a > dir is easy if your init.d runs after localmount: > [ ! -d /var/run/foo ] && install -d -m 755 -o fowner -g fgroup /var/run/foo oh, and for the very few cases that need

Re: [gentoo-dev] keepdir /var/run/package/?

2010-08-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 3:33 PM, Eray Aslan wrote: >> It will be somewhat more work but instead of the above, we can say "tmpfs >> might be used for /var/run and /var/lock and the init scripts should handle >> this correctly".  It feels (for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Add --hash-style=gnu to LDFLAGS

2010-08-13 Thread Markos Chandras
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 10:35:57AM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote: > Hi, > > Mike Frysinger : > > sounds like someone needs to update/extend the arch testing > > documentation. random e-mails posted to random dev lists are quickly > > forgotten. new arch testers however should be reading the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global use flag: vpx or vp8

2010-08-13 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:11:32 +0200 Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: > So I think a USE="vp8" or USE="webm" (probably the first) to enable > decoding, and USE="vpx" should be used to fine tune what > implementation to use. Having USE="vp8" (no USE="vpx" specified) in > make.conf should give you support fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flag: vpx or vp8

2010-08-13 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 1 August 2010 01:32, Steve Dibb wrote: [...] > The description is misleading, and needs to be changed.  Just because > something has an mp3 and a lame use flag, it does not mean that flipping on > lame means that the application will prefer lame over mad or mpg123. lame (the MP3 encoder) has n

[gentoo-dev] Re: New global use flag: vpx or vp8

2010-08-13 Thread Peter Hjalmarsson
lör 2010-07-31 klockan 13:37 +0200 skrev Hanno Böck: > vpx for supporting googles vp8 codec used in webm. > > At the moment this is only mplayer and ffmpeg, but it's pretty obvious that > apps supporting vp8 will start popping up everywhere (currently working on > arista ebuild which will suppor