Re: [gentoo-dev] Some ideas on how to reduce territoriality

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:36:23AM +0100, Richard Brown wrote: > On 07/08/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in an ideal world, yes ... in the real world however, i wouldnt trust it > > -mike > > You wouldn't trust what, exactly? A dev to install a package they're > bumping? Surely

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: joining the Software Freedom Conservancy

; > agree that > >any software distributed by the Project will be distributed solely as > > Free Software. > > If that's not a problem I think this is a great idea. > It's not a problem - what we actually produce as a product, the ebuilds, etc., are free t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2007/08

unity to be online. I appreciate the nomination (especially so out of the blue), and wish the Council nominees the best of luck. - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] ML changes

Talk like this, especially from people I respected, makes me question just what its worth to keep going. If Gentoo is only about the devs, well, I'm happy with the way things are now, they work for me, so no sense in working any further on perl-land. Bah. - -- - -o()o-----

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: app-admin/gentoo-bugger

I won't object if it silently disappears in the night. - -- - -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9

Re: [gentoo-dev] Do not modify ebuilds which are already in the tree... even if masked

ers, i'm not bumping it. I fail to see the point in bumping a package when the only change is use arm && doblah what's the point? - -- - -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.

Re: [gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

-o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - -o()o-- Hi, I'

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Non-Dev Contributors and the Tree

shell script (or a bad one, as the case may be). Comments? ~mcummings P.S. Core readers, the irony isn't lost on me that I am posting to dev. Consider this my last ditch post about development on -dev :) - -- - -o()o--

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: gsl

ositive feedback on these things usually (never) (i don't really know, i didn't really check that assertion.) ++ on the global use flag thingie, though i really don't think those are ever going to catch on... - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummin

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Joe Peterson (lavajoe)

pa from the fly-by). And...but does it run linux?? (does this count as a weird response for email?) - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bye Gentoo! [THOSE AREN'T PROCTORS...] [eroyf, you're in here too]

sentient fungus armies. - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking virtuals stable

(in a positive sense) vocal about arch related items, so they were the ones that came to mind when i threw in the comment about arch's commenting. Double bah. I think i've dug a good hole here. Let me get in it. - -- - -o()o--

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Marking virtuals stable

arch brains step in, like weeve in particular, who is usually far more eloquent at defending an arch's position - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: That time again...

ers only look to -dev for the flame wars, not the fun stuff). ~mcummings -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C E

[gentoo-dev] That time again...

arted this thread - at this rate, we might make enough input to make Chris' job on the gwn easier). -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

uild - there's also eclasses, everything under profiles, etc. -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C

Re: [gentoo-dev] $Header:$ and ebuilds

current tree or not (because just asking when the last time they synch'd doesn't help). ~mcummings -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proctors Episode II - Attack of the clones

On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 09:53:55PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: > You can see some of our outfits at > http://dev.gentoo.org/~mark_alec/photos/Postbusters.jpg I think I'm going to have to do counciling now... -- -o()o------ Micha

Re: [gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

:P This email was intended as light hearted - neither camel's nor bovine were harmed in the process. That and it pains me to make that point about competition. ~mcummings -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl

Re: [gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 10:43:58AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > -t fixed (not in svn yet, but it was an easy thing to fix) > > trying to compile something that should take more than an hour on my box to > make > sure -c is fixed also. Sorry about the shoddy release, > c

Re: [gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

dy release, ~mcummings -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -o()o-- Hi, I'

Re: [gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

getting which way its supposed to be to get the pretty icons) > -- > gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list > BAH. Figures. Mind posting this on bugs.g.o and assigning it to me directly? Thanks :/ (no, really, thank you, but at the same time...bah :) -- -o()o

Re: [gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

original authors, but replaced bug references to point to bugs.g.o, which folks were doing anyway - fuzzyray can attest to that). -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/S

[gentoo-dev] genlop-0.30.6 released

-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -o()o-- Hi, I'm a .signature virus! Please copy me in your ~/.sign

[gentoo-dev] *DEVELOPMENT* mail list, right?

ects people are working on? Anyone? -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion: INVALID -> NOCHANGE in bugzilla

on, not more convoluted closure flags, is the solution. IMHO. You know. Word. ~mcummings -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76

Re: [gentoo-dev] [soc] Python bindings for Paludis

how much they would whither and die without a gentoo core. There was an example of gentoo+gnome integration (i think) in a previous email - that wouldn't be any more appropriate. Unless there's the Gentoo Inc copyright in the header, it isn't eligible in my opinion. ~mcummings, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fwd: RE: New developer: Antoine Raillon (cab)

one of the longest running new-dev bugs, congrats! -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 09:28:50 -0400 Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 07:30 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote: > > banning/suspending a user from a mailing list. They would retain the > > right to receive the mail, just not comment fo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

ime, -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -o()o-- signa

Re: [gentoo-dev] mod_perl in apache conf

On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 17:34:39 -0500 Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 22:43:01 +0100 > Thibaut Fernagut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > To start this I'm opening with a -dev question : > > Why is mod_perl not in the default /e

Re: [gentoo-dev] mod_perl in apache conf

to be added - didn't realize it hadn't been tbh (new subject line, so hopefully unless your mail client threads but message-id's this should break the chain) -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev

[gentoo-dev] dev-perl/Newt masked for removal

It isn't maintained (last update was in 1998), doesn't build, and isn't dep'd by anything. Package masked for removal at the end of the month. -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|

Re: [gentoo-dev] static vs dynamic doc ref?

On Tue, 6 Mar 2007 15:17:46 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 06 March 2007, Michael Cummings wrote: > i dont think this has really been documented properly, but the logic > behind it is pretty simple ... > > not providing static libraries and o

[gentoo-dev] static vs dynamic doc ref?

way - I never have a good reference). And yes, given the option, I'd do away with sys-devel/libperl all together and just build the library once, preferably dynamically since it leaves a smaller footprint for perl ;) ~mcummings -- -o()o---------- Mich

Re: [gentoo-dev] Little respect towards Daniel please

the rest of us are fine, jolly even (though i just learned chriswhite is absent, which explains the lack of pole dancing comments in my life) - no reason to despair because a couple of kids are fighting it out in stunning ascii. -- -o()o------ Michael C

Re: [gentoo-dev] Treecleaneres

On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:59 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > In the meantime, please don't remove stuff. Just to be a pain - you're referring only to treecleaner removals, right? -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-per

Re: [gentoo-dev] Herds, take your marks...get set...take stuff!

On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 05:15 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > [1] http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/qa.php?q=no-herd-maintainer If someone takes adocman, would you be willing to move it out of dev-perl? (since it isn't a module) -- -o()o------

[gentoo-dev] Removing dev-perl/RPM

Masked since 23 Oct 2006, removed. -- -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -o()o

Re: [gentoo-dev] [ANNOUNCE] Anonymous CVS and SVN now available

oolkit keychain portage nice work! is there a tracker bug for requesting other sources.g.o svn's to be added? -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November

On Tue, 2006-11-07 at 08:06 -0600, Lance Albertson wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-11-06 at 17:48 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> - make sending gentoo.org mail via gentoo.org mail server > >> friendly/recommended > >> -mike > > &g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for November

, doesn't allow 25 to leave their network. To send mail, I *have* to relay through their mail servers. -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543

Re: [gentoo-dev] Only you can prevent broken portage trees

ey and space to personally house more than a handful of machines at home. -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5

[gentoo-dev] Masking and removing dev-perl/rpm

n later. -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E -o()o-- signature.asc Descrip

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for XMMS

tux > media-plugins/xmms-xf86audio > media-plugins/xmms-xmmsd > media-plugins/xmms-xmmsmplayer > media-sound/ctrlxmms > media-sound/longplayer > media-sound/madman > media-sound/xmms > x11-plugins/gaim-xmms-remote > x11-themes/xmms-themes > > They'

Re: [gentoo-nfp] Re: [gentoo-dev] New Trustees - My Resignation

of promoting the next "winner" in the elections. There were 2 more candidates than positions on the ballot, which means they didn't come in next by default but by actual votes. -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #g

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Trustees 2006 election results

boojum > wolf31o2 > mcummings > stuart > rl03 > pauldv > > > > > Cheers, > /Alexandre -- -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Seeking the missing dates that past and present developers joined Gentoo.

Can I be the first to point out that drobbins is on the list, so it's a fair guess that whenever Gentoo started was his start date...? Aw, come on, there's one of us in every crowd. :) -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #g

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Alon Bar-Lev (alonbl)

e! > > And soon there will be three of us - I'm moving to Israel some time > next year ;-) > yuval too. -- -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changes in Developer Relations and log of devrel meeting

s that you can get copies of the irc logs from by subscribing to the mailing list. Oh, the humanity! The subterfuge!! The sarcasm!!! -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC

Re: [gentoo-dev] SCHEDULED DOWNTIME: {cvs,svn}.gentoo.org - 2006-10-05 - 1900UTC - 2300UTC

nd > svn are down. Starts at $5, who'se in? > Depends - is it a forfeit if I'm both in the pool and one of the first to ask? -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:48 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > > Geo-IP > > Can you please leave this one, it's rather useful :) > > Just let me know what in the tree is using it :) Mind you, the actual removal of packages will be a group eff

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

Mark it in the meta then. or learn to use g-cpan. On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 15:19 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Sunday 01 October 2006 15:08, Michael Cummings wrote: > > RPC-XML > This is needed for CIA commit scripts, might be a good idea to leave it there &g

[gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-perl] Candidates for removal from dev-perl]

bug 21549 perl-PBS perlmenu: bug 136223 perlrapi: bug 17419 perlsieve: bug 23893 set-scalar: bug 24607 tagged: bug 21174 -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/A

[gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

+++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]: How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate section? I think my original reply got lost, so just in case - seems like a time for sunset overlays ;0 ~mcummings -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New project: Gentoo Seeds

a new cd over the old install and it worked fine" would be nice. so maybe i'm already biased in all of this. nb2. maybe i'm also missing the point of parts of this discussion. nb3. there is no nb3. -- -o()o-- Michael Cummings |

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 52 - GLEP 23 revisited

ke.conf variable for allowed licenses and block based on that? -- -o()o---------- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: media-gfx/imagemagick needs a temp maintainer

used to build imagemagick and reuse it for building perlmagick, building only the perl portions and ensuring that we were binding against the correct libraries on $root. But hey, what do I know, I only maintained it for 2 or 3 years. -- -o()o-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: media-gfx/imagemagick needs a temp maintainer

use flag is a recent edition in the scheme of things. -- -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: media-gfx/imagemagick needs a temp maintainer

tant as security fixed, but well - if the new > imagemagick-version, which became stabel recently, would have a new > version for the libMagick.so, then users would have a broken perl-module > again. > > Makes me wonder if we shouldn't just resurect the perlmagic ebuild again and b

Re: [gentoo-dev] GIMP 1.2 has gotta die

st checking reverse deps in case it impacted any of the gimp perl deps - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Package Manager Specification: configuration protection

_cfg* files, haven't I? - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - -o()o-- -BEGIN PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Local USE flags bite the dust

.1.0 ebuild. - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E

Re: [gentoo-dev] Trustees Announcement

lining the role) and so there is still 1 slot open? - -- - -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F

Re: [gentoo-dev] The Gentoo Project proudly presents *drums* anigel *applaud*

#x27;t believe I read through all that to get insulted. - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB

Re: [gentoo-dev] Removing dev-perl/Test-Builder-Tester

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Cummings wrote: > This package was absorbed back into perl-core/Test-Simple as of the 0.62 > release (which you have either via dev-lang/perl-5.8.8 or as the ebuild > at this point). I'm package.mask'ing it and will be r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Democracy: No silver bullet

l it might be working towards at the moment. somebody shoot me, my job in middle management is finally getting to me. - -- - -----o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/A

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for cleaning portage a bit (themes and other eyecandy stuff)

aludis was not up to this job if the repository didn't fit some rather strict guidelines. - -- - -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG:

[gentoo-dev] axkit needs you! (before we give it the axe)

ng it (due to a lack of love, attention, and time). Thanks! - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2

[gentoo-dev] Yet Another Victim

lp prepare him for the volume of mail on this list. So let's all give it up for yuval! - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk's X use flag

rl use flag is to avoid make perl a dep for every package that inherits the eclass even if perl isn't in your personal USE flags. - -- - -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gent

[gentoo-dev] Removing dev-perl/Test-Builder-Tester

vant bug number if you are really super curious). ~mcummings - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: helping out - how?

ync ('cept maybe timeliness of your mirror) - -- - -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: helping out - how?

come with their own patch solutions :) - -- - -o()o-- Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net Gentoo/SPARC Gentoo/AMD64 GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E - -o()o-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Re: GPL and Source code providing

3, they would have to get the sources anyway to proceed forward, so this would fill the initial gap...or am I missing something more critical?) - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freen

Re: [gentoo-dev] Future developer

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Congrats... So how does it feel to fork(); ? ;) > Silly, that's how you *make* the kid - he that about 30+ weeks ago... - -- - -o()o------ Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl

Re: [gentoo-dev] help

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Podeanu wrote: > help help: help [-s] [pattern ...] Display helpful information about builtin commands. If PATTERN is specified, gives detailed help on all commands matching PATTERN, otherwise a list of the builtins is printed. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Assigning bugs to treecleaners

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alec Warner wrote: > I'd prefer if you are going to remove a package and you want > treecleaners to do it; either talk to a treecleaners project member on > irc or via the alias first, or just assign it to maintainer-needed and > CC treecleaners. > [1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Masking perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker, eventual removal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Hill wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: >> OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one >> responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing, > > *yay* heh - only bug I've

Re: [gentoo-dev] Masking perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker, eventual removal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, I attempted this in November of 05 (then forgot?), but since no one responded to my last round, it has been removed. Happy gentoo'ing, ~mcummings Michael Cummings wrote: > Once upon a time ago, we added ExtUtils-MakeMaker to the tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] variable quoting, setting optional variables to "", and depending on virtual/libc

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > If RDEPEND is not set, it is defaulted to $DEPEND by portage. Alas, if only. If you inherit an eclass with deps this carry over won't happen. (And I have the bugs to prove it ;) ~mcummings -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Ver

herding (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? project sunrise as an almost-fork.)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 OK, when I get invoked by name, then I have to respond :) (obligatory bah) Mind you, this conversation really deserves its own thread since my comments stray far, far away from the sunset project (that's going to be my project for retired ebuilds avail

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: A heretical thought? Blessing project sunrise as an almost-fork.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Gianelloni wrote: > Using your example, if it will *never* make it into the tree, then what > is it doing on *.gentoo.org infrastructure? OK, I'll speak up. I plan on using overlay.gentoo.org for the perl team overlay repository. dev-perl alone

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage-2.1 released

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > No! It's a flying pig! :) (a little late) someone is lacking in proper Gentoo spirit. We have flying cows , not pigs. ~mcummings -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with M

Re: [gentoo-dev] Intent to remove www-apache/mod_parrot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Cummings wrote: > mod_parrot hasn't been updated upstream in a *long* time, doesn't build > against an even remotely current version of parrot, and seems for all > intents to be pretty dead upstream (a nice idea th

[gentoo-dev] Masking perl-core/ExtUtils-MakeMaker, eventual removal

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Once upon a time ago, we added ExtUtils-MakeMaker to the tree to deal with some dramatic changes between perl versions and what they supported. The time for that has passed, and this package only serves to cause problems with the perl tree. Unless ther

[gentoo-dev] Intent to remove www-apache/mod_parrot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 mod_parrot hasn't been updated upstream in a *long* time, doesn't build against an even remotely current version of parrot, and seems for all intents to be pretty dead upstream (a nice idea that never panned out). Unless there are objections, I will be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages that need maintainers

On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 18:09 -0500, Daniel Goller wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > ./dev-perl/Event-ExecFlow (dvd::rip dep) > ./dev-perl/AnyEvent(dvd::rip dep) Perl herd will grab these. For that matter, the metadata already points to us... ~mcummings signature.asc Descripti

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: aging ebuilds with unstable keywords

On Mon, 10 Apr 2006 08:44:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 10 April 2006 04:19, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Paul de Vrieze wrote: > > > On Monday 10 April 2006 05:26, Daniel Ahlberg wrote: > > >> * if ebuild has $PN in SRC_URI (cosmet

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improving Gentoo User Relations

On Friday 07 April 2006 11:15, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Fri, 7 Apr 2006 10:21:54 +0100, > > I would also suggest creation of a gentoo-dev-help@ mailing-list. Not to be a wet blanket (I'm all for making current users happier and encouraging new folks to take the bold step) but isn't

[gentoo-dev] Bump and grind etiquete

I have to ask, please refrain from adding packages to the tree and assigning them to a herd that you have no part in. The folks that watch those herds would appreciate it. It'd also be nice if you did this if you at least got all of the deps correct. Please refrain from arbitrarily bumping pac

Re: [gentoo-dev] When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?

On Tuesday 04 April 2006 05:42, Jan Kundrát wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > Relax, spb, it's all good :) > > spb != geoman :) BAH! People shouldn't be allowed to have overlapping initials or something /me puts moritorium on other mcummings and MPC&#

Re: [gentoo-dev] When will KDE 3.5 be marked as stable?

On Monday 03 April 2006 19:11, Stephen P. Becker wrote: > Whether it is meant to be flamebait or not is irrelevant. This list > isn't for whining about (the lack of) stable keywords for any particular > ebuild or set of ebuilds. Probably missing part of the thread or something, but I think the OP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Official overlay support

On Friday 24 March 2006 10:41, Andres Loeh wrote: > At the moment, Haskell is only a herd and a team, not a project. Then stand up my brother! perl wasn't so different, so we snuck in a project page. no one said anything. i'm going with we're a project to govern the direction and maintenance of

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Karol Pasternak (reb)

On Tuesday 21 March 2006 14:25, Karol Wojtaszek wrote: > Welcome aboard Karol! One more person from Poland! Let's takeover Gentoo > and make it Polish distro! ;> i thought it was polished alreadyoh...polish ;) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOTed MySQL or not?

On Thursday 09 March 2006 11:00, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Don't be so hard on yourself. Everyone thinks you did a great job with > MySQL. Ditto - and I voted against a slotted mysql at that :/ Maybe there needs to be an IWANTSLOTS feature or something, because the same rationale for why I was ag

Re: [gentoo-dev] QA Roles v2

On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 20:49 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > Now, you've heard that dropping keywords is bad. But you have a clever > idea, and make the dep alsa? ( !sparc? ( alsa libraries ) ). This gets > past repoman just fine. > As any arch can tell you, that's never stopped me - *IF* you do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Beware DESCRIPTION clobbering

On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 02:36 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > dev-perl/XML-AutoWriter-0.38: description: > major: DESCRIPTION equal to $PN? You can do better than that. slightly off topic (fixed btw - perl herd didn't add it, but it was 'given' to us) but if you're (NOT ciaranm, general reply) g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Bugzilla etiquette suggestions

On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 02:50 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > What I'd do with such bugs is thank the user, but say next time, please > give me a few days, at least a week (or whatever a dev feels comfortable > with for that package, again, it'll vary) -- if it's /just/ a bump > request. If I take over a

[gentoo-dev] amd64 && perl-5.8.8 && perl-cleaner

Hey kids, It's always something...perl-5.8.8 (~arch) is our first perl install that correctly utilizes /usr/lib64. In itself, a good thing, but the @INC that gets generated is geared towards /usr/lib64 (still a good thing), but as such perl-cleaner gets confused because your old perl modul

  1   2   >