Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 Profiles Stable

On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 18:52 -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: > All, on behalf of the ARM64 project, we are announcing that the ARM64 profiles > are now stable. > Does this mean you're no longer going to break them? ;-) -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally s

[gentoo-dev] ARM64 Profiles Stable

All, on behalf of the ARM64 project, we are announcing that the ARM64 profiles are now stable. Thank you to all who have contributed across the community. -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but > it appears that someone went out and did some dele

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: >> > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >> >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but >> >> it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in >> >> profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without b

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

On 30 Mar 2015 09:54, Tom Gall wrote: > Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears > that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some > WIP > things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. just use the web viewer:

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 10:37 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > > On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > >> Hi All, > >> > >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears > >> that someone wen

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev > wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears >> that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some >> WIP

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: > Hi All, > > Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears > that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some > WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. > > A) C

[gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

Hi All, Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. A) Could the guilty party come forward? B) If there was something ob

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 Mar 2nd update

On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 02 Mar 2015 17:14, Tom Gall wrote: > > I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space. > See: > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall > > you should take over uploading to our existing experimental space: > http://

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 Mar 2nd update

On 02 Mar 2015 17:14, Tom Gall wrote: > I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space. See: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall you should take over uploading to our existing experimental space: http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/arm64/ should be easy to do ... an

[gentoo-dev] arm64 Mar 2nd update

I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space. See: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall For this week plan to test install stage3 on the HiKey and start to get the handbook updated in the wiki. We’ll end up with an img that can be dd’ed to sd medi

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

Thanks for doing that Yixun, I’ll start on your list a little bit later this evening. Best, Tom > On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:49 PM, Yixun Lan wrote: > > On 14:27 Wed 18 Feb , Tom Gall wrote: >> So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board >> is going to start shipp

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

On 14:27 Wed 18 Feb , Tom Gall wrote: > So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is > going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64 > bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of memory > on the board but

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

On 19/02/15 01:05, Anthony G. Basile wrote: I have about $1000 in grant money. Want to recommend some equipment? The dragonboard might be good BUT there are doubts on software availability. lu

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

On 02/18/15 15:32, C Bergström wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall wrote: So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64 bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Onl

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

> On Feb 18, 2015, at 2:32 PM, C Bergström wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall > wrote: > So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is > going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall wrote: > So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board > is going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way > 64 bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of > memory on the boar

[gentoo-dev] arm64 update

So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64 bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of memory on the board but it’s not a bad device. I’ve had one for about 2-3

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 09:36:06 -0600 Steven Lembark wrote: > On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:43:49 +0100 > Sebastian Pipping wrote: > > > I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. > > If I could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me > > understand the issue. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On Mon, 02 Feb 2015 00:44:20 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > So I don't need shell access any more, at least not in this context. If you are interested in fixing things feel free to ping me and we can get you ssh access (assuming that an Opteron 2376 is sufficient) prior to needing it :-) --

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:43:49 +0100 Sebastian Pipping wrote: > I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. If I > could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me > understand the issue. I can give you an accout here; system is Opteron 2000 (i.e., ancient) bu

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

Thanks! The issue and fix are clear by now (for details: http://sourceforge.net/p/uriparser/bugs/24/). So I don't need shell access any more, at least not in this context. Best, Sebastian On 25.01.2015 18:49, Tom Gall wrote: > Least speaking for myself I can help you out starting Feb 15th, pre

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 14:10 +0800, Yixun Lan wrote: > On 20:57 Sat 24 Jan , Tom Gall wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been > > throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has > > all been painfully remote a

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On 20:57 Sat 24 Jan , Tom Gall wrote: > Hi All, > > This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been > throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all > been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for > massive

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

Least speaking for myself I can help you out starting Feb 15th, presuming all the stars are in alignment. If someone else doesn’t help you before, please mark it on your calendar and bug me again then cause I’m sure I’ll forget! Best, Tom > On Jan 25, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrot

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

Hi! I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. If I could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me understand the issue. Best, Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On 01/24/15 21:57, Tom Gall wrote: Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key wording effor

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

On 25/01/15 03:57, Tom Gall wrote: Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key wording efforts

[gentoo-dev] arm64

Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key wording efforts. That’s about to change. So if

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

On 04/23/2014 05:04 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:50:03 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: The arm64 profiles are marked exp in profiles.desc, so we don't have to care about the keyword status. Ah okay; nevermind then, my concern didn't take that into account. I like this technique b

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 15:50:03 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > The arm64 profiles are marked exp in profiles.desc, so we don't have > to care about the keyword status. Ah okay; nevermind then, my concern didn't take that into account. -- With kind regards, Tom Wijsman (TomWij) Gentoo Developer E-

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 09:43:24PM +0200, Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:13:16 +0400 > Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > > 22.04.2014 21:59, Mike Gilbert пишет: > > > > > Ok, then the stable keyword is going to get lost when I drop old > > > versions. > > > > Vapier can restore stable keywo

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 22:13:16 +0400 Mikle Kolyada wrote: > 22.04.2014 21:59, Mike Gilbert пишет: > > > Ok, then the stable keyword is going to get lost when I drop old > > versions. > > Vapier can restore stable keywords for newest version if needed, i > think Repeating that is a flashing exper

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

22.04.2014 21:59, Mike Gilbert пишет: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: >> 22.04.2014 21:40, Mike Gilbert пишет: >>> I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of >>> packages. >>> >>> When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these pack

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > > 22.04.2014 21:40, Mike Gilbert пишет: >> I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of >> packages. >> >> When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these packages, >> is there an arm64 arch team I shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

22.04.2014 21:40, Mike Gilbert пишет: > I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of > packages. > > When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these packages, > is there an arm64 arch team I should copy? If not, these stable > keywords are just going to get l

[gentoo-dev] ARM64 stable keyword

I see that vapier has been adding arm64 as a stable keyword to lots of packages. When I am requesting stabilization for newer versions these packages, is there an arm64 arch team I should copy? If not, these stable keywords are just going to get lost as old ebuilds get dropped. For an example, se