Re: [gentoo-user] Apache RProxy setup

2005-04-06 Thread Patrick Marquetecken
> Eric S. Johansson wrote: > >> Leo wrote: >> >>> Eric: >>> >>> I am not familiar with pound... >>> >>> My reverse proxy is only for web requests :) This is how i do it in the apache conf: ProxyPass /exchange/ http://SPBmail/exchange/ ProxyPassReverse /exchange/ http://SPBmail/exchange/ the sec

Re: [gentoo-user] apache core

2005-04-05 Thread Andy McCarty
* Haim Ashkenazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-04-05 17:14:07 -0700]: > I don't use fastcgi, but have you tested the ulimit settings for the > user > that runs it (ulimit -a)? > > The default for my user is: > archie openldap # ulimit -a > core file size(blocks, -c) 0 > [...] > The webser

Re: [gentoo-user] apache core

2005-04-05 Thread Haim Ashkenazi
On Wednesday 06 April 2005 01:57, Andy McCarty wrote: > I have been running on BSD and recently switched > to Gentoo. > > It seems that by default the BSD will let my fastcgi > programs running under apache produce core files. > > Can someone give this newbie any ideas on how to get > Gentoo to do

[gentoo-user] apache core

2005-04-05 Thread Andy McCarty
I have been running on BSD and recently switched to Gentoo. It seems that by default the BSD will let my fastcgi programs running under apache produce core files. Can someone give this newbie any ideas on how to get Gentoo to do the same thing? I have done some Googling and can't seem to find

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache RProxy setup

2005-04-05 Thread Leo
Eric S. Johansson wrote: Leo wrote: Eric: I am not familiar with pound... My reverse proxy is only for web requests :) I am not sure if pound fits my requirements I understand. Yes, it will work, yes. it does fit your requirements. I'm just not sure how to set the configuration file. It's proba

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache RProxy setup

2005-04-05 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Leo wrote: Eric: I am not familiar with pound... My reverse proxy is only for web requests :) I want "http:///perl/*" to be proxied; I don't mind if my lightweight apache handles stuff like "http:///imgs/logo.png" That way my memory intensive perl app doesn't consume large amounts of memory for r

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache RProxy setup

2005-04-05 Thread Leo
Eric: I am not familiar with pound... My reverse proxy is only for web requests :) I want "http:///perl/*" to be proxied; I don't mind if my lightweight apache handles stuff like "http:///imgs/logo.png" That way my memory intensive perl app doesn't consume large amounts of memory for requests o

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache RProxy setup

2005-04-05 Thread Eric S. Johansson
Leo wrote: Is there a preferred *Gentoo* way setup this up? Any suggestions, pitfalls alerts, or comments are welcome. yea, use pound. the Apache reverse proxy has some nasty pitfalls which can leave you open to attack by spammers. i.e. they use your proxy to connect to other mail servers. whil

[gentoo-user] Apache RProxy setup

2005-04-05 Thread Leo
Hi I use apache2 and mod_perl; I would like to setup a lightweight server (the default one on port 80) and a mod_perl enabled server (on the same machine) for processing the actual perl stuff. If I screw up perl I still have the static stuff available. There are also a series of benefits like

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-04-01 Thread A. Khattri
On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo wrote: > so, I write this, because, I found a solution to my problem. And there > is how I solved it: > > #ebuild /path/of/mod_php.ebuild fetch > #ebuild /path/of/mod_perl.ebuild fetch > #ebuild /path/of/apache-1.3.33.ebuild fetch > > #ebuild /path/

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-04-01 Thread Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo
Why do I need mod_perl and mod_phop as static modules ? because there are some modules that required as it. For example for mod_perl, I need the HTML-Mason and at a paragraph in the readme file says: "Using Mason with a mod_perl DSO may cause your Apache server to crash silently at startup, or fai

[gentoo-user] Apache ebuild can't see Berkeley DB?

2005-03-31 Thread A. Khattri
I did a search in Bugzilla and didn't see this reported anywhere, so I thought I would ask here before posting it as a bug. Im building the latest Apache (1.x) ebuild, during the configure process: Creating Makefile in src + configured for Linux platform + setting C compiler to gcc + setting C

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-03-30 Thread A. Khattri
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, MOLINA BRAVO FELIPE DE JESUS wrote: > But with this form the modules are installed as dinamic ... and static ... > how??? Why do you need static modules? There's no difference in functionality when using dynamic modules. I would be loathe to make mod_perl static - it makes

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-03-29 Thread MOLINA BRAVO FELIPE DE JESUS
But with this form the modules are installed as dinamic ... and static ... how??? thanks -Original Message- From: A. Khattri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tue 3/29/2005 7:49 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject:RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-03-29 Thread A. Khattri
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo wrote: > But i need to install mod_perl and mod_php as apache static modules. > Also i need apache 1.3.33. > > I make: > > ebuild mod_perl-1.29 fetch > ebuild apache-1.3.33 fetch > ebuild mod_php-4.3.9 fetch > > ebuild mod_perl-1.29 unpack > ebuild

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-03-29 Thread Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo
-2005 a las 08:18 +0100, Peter Berkenbosch escribió: > > -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > > Van: Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Verzonden: donderdag 24 maart 2005 1:52 > > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Onderwerp: [gentoo-user] apache-1

Re: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-03-24 Thread Kashani
Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo wrote: How can install apache-1.3.33 with support for mod_perl and mod_php? My first solution is with variable USE="perl php" is correct? no, apache 1.3 only has two use variables, ssl and pam. emerge apache mod_php mod_perl kashani -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing lis

RE: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php

2005-03-23 Thread Peter Berkenbosch
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht- > Van: Felipe de Jesús Molina Bravo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Verzonden: donderdag 24 maart 2005 1:52 > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Onderwerp: [gentoo-user] apache-1.3.33 with mod_perl and mod_php > > How can install apache-1.3.33 with sup

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache + PHP5

2005-03-05 Thread Ivan Yosifov
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77556 You need the masked dev-php/mod_php-5.0.3-r1 On Fri, 2005-03-04 at 20:10 +1300, Ash Varma wrote: > Hi. > > I have been using apache-2.0.52-r2 and PHP5 for a while... Recently > upgraded to apache-2.0.52-r3 and moved all the configs to the httpd.conf >

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache + PHP5

2005-03-04 Thread Craig Duncan
Ash Varma wrote: Hi. I have been using apache-2.0.52-r2 and PHP5 for a while... Recently upgraded to apache-2.0.52-r3 and moved all the configs to the httpd.conf However, I cannot get PHP5 to work... All browsers try to download the file, rather than display it... What could be wrong? I have includ

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache + PHP5

2005-03-04 Thread A. Khattri
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005, Ash Varma wrote: > I have been using apache-2.0.52-r2 and PHP5 for a while... Recently > upgraded to apache-2.0.52-r3 and moved all the configs to the httpd.conf > > However, I cannot get PHP5 to work... All browsers try to download the > file, rather than display it... > > Wha

[gentoo-user] Apache + PHP5

2005-03-03 Thread Ash Varma
Hi. I have been using apache-2.0.52-r2 and PHP5 for a while... Recently upgraded to apache-2.0.52-r3 and moved all the configs to the httpd.conf However, I cannot get PHP5 to work... All browsers try to download the file, rather than display it... What could be wrong? I have included what I thin

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache/mod_mono... maybe a little OT..but it is running on gentoo :)

2005-02-20 Thread RNuno
Christian Parpart wrote: On Sunday 20 February 2005 9:05 am, Reno Romanin wrote: 1. Can mod_mono be configured like mod_php? What I mean is, can I set mod_mono up to have apache parse asp.net stuff anywhere I might have a web accessible directory? Just as apache will parse any php

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache/mod_mono... maybe a little OT..but it is running on gentoo :)

2005-02-20 Thread Christian Parpart
On Sunday 20 February 2005 9:05 am, Reno Romanin wrote: > 1. Can mod_mono be configured like mod_php? What I mean is, can I set > mod_mono up to have apache parse asp.net stuff anywhere I might have a web > accessible directory? Just as apache will parse any php code no matter > where it is accesse

[gentoo-user] Apache/mod_mono... maybe a little OT..but it is running on gentoo :)

2005-02-20 Thread Reno Romanin
I was working on getting mod_mono setup to run on vhosts a while back, got it all running, and had some "issues" with server hardware before I could get a decent backup. I've been thinking about this for a while now and I have a couple of questions. 1. Can mod_mono be configured like mod_php? What

Re: [gentoo-user] apache php and mysql

2005-02-12 Thread Bastian Balthazar Bux
Makurin Roman ha scritto: Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ 13 ÐÐÐÑÐÐÑ 2005 02:00 PK ÑÐÐ(a): Is there a place where I can find a decent step by step howto for installing and confuguring apache mysql and php? I found one on the forums, here http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=2086047#2086047 But I followed

Re: [gentoo-user] apache php and mysql

2005-02-12 Thread Makurin Roman
Ð ÑÐÐÐÑ ÐÑ 13 ÐÐÐÑÐÐÑ 2005 02:00 PK ÑÐÐ(a): > Is there a place where I can find a decent step by step howto for > installing and confuguring apache mysql and php? > > I found one on the forums, here > http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=2086047#2086047 > > But I followed it exactly and

[gentoo-user] apache php and mysql

2005-02-12 Thread PK
Is there a place where I can find a decent step by step howto for installing and confuguring apache mysql and php? I found one on the forums, here http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic.php?p=2086047#2086047 But I followed it exactly and got errors Any ideas? Thanks -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailin

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache & Mysql Backup System

2005-01-28 Thread Kashani
Seunghyun. Cho wrote: I am running apache/php and Mysql on my gentoo server. I just backup tar copies everyday. When the system is down, it is very difficult to recover it. So I'd like to make automatic backup(or load ballancing) system for my site. How can I implement this on gentoo machine. One i

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache & Mysql Backup System

2005-01-28 Thread Chris Boot
Hi, If I'm not mistaken, this has been done and is in constant use on big sites like SourceForge and the like. I'm not sure of the details of the operation, but I seem to remember reading an overview about it on the site somewhere. They do, however, have lots of money to burn on load balancers.

[gentoo-user] Apache & Mysql Backup System

2005-01-28 Thread Seunghyun. Cho
Hi, I am running apache/php and Mysql on my gentoo server. I just backup tar copies everyday. When the system is down, it is very difficult to recover it. So I'd like to make automatic backup(or load ballancing) system for my site. How can I implement this on gentoo machine. One is main web&db se

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 1.3 & 2.0 together ?

2005-01-27 Thread D. Wokan
D. Wokan wrote: David García Pérez wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:25:48 +0100, Rick van Hattem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: raptor wrote: hi, can apache 1.3 and 2.0 coexist on the same machine ? if yes is it nececeary something else to be done, configured ? what about mod_perl1 & mod_perl2 ? what abo

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache an deflate_module

2005-01-27 Thread Anielkis Herrera Gonzalez
ok, thanks:-) -- Anielkis Herrera Gonzalez Desarrollador de Nova Linux OS Linux User #377809 Estudiante 4to año Universidad de las Ciencias Informaticas

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache an deflate_module

2005-01-27 Thread Dirk Raeder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anielkis Herrera Gonzalez wrote: > * Apache2 has detected a syntax error in your configuration files: > Syntax error on line 70 of /etc/apache2/conf/apache2.conf: > module deflate_module is built-in and can't be loaded > > I saw in the ebuild file an

[gentoo-user] Apache an deflate_module

2005-01-27 Thread Anielkis Herrera Gonzalez
I was emerged apache2 and when it was started, I got this: * Apache2 has detected a syntax error in your configuration files: Syntax error on line 70 of /etc/apache2/conf/apache2.conf: module deflate_module is built-in and can't be loaded I saw in the ebuild file and it has "--enable-deflate" bu

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 1.3 & 2.0 together ?

2005-01-25 Thread D. Wokan
David García Pérez wrote: On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:25:48 +0100, Rick van Hattem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: raptor wrote: hi, can apache 1.3 and 2.0 coexist on the same machine ? if yes is it nececeary something else to be done, configured ? what about mod_perl1 & mod_perl2 ? what about apreq1 & apre

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 1.3 & 2.0 together ?

2005-01-25 Thread David García Pérez
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:25:48 +0100, Rick van Hattem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > raptor wrote: > > > hi, > > > > can apache 1.3 and 2.0 coexist on the same machine ? > > if yes is it nececeary something else to be done, configured ? > > what about mod_perl1 & mod_perl2 ? > > what about apreq1 & ap

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 1.3 & 2.0 together ?

2005-01-24 Thread Rick van Hattem
raptor wrote: hi, can apache 1.3 and 2.0 coexist on the same machine ? if yes is it nececeary something else to be done, configured ? what about mod_perl1 & mod_perl2 ? what about apreq1 & apreq2 ? tia -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list I know apache 1.3 and 2.0 can run toghether on one machin

[gentoo-user] apache 1.3 & 2.0 together ?

2005-01-24 Thread raptor
hi, can apache 1.3 and 2.0 coexist on the same machine ? if yes is it nececeary something else to be done, configured ? what about mod_perl1 & mod_perl2 ? what about apreq1 & apreq2 ? tia -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Apache-Gallery

2005-01-22 Thread Bruno Lustosa
Hello, trying to get Apache-Gallery working, but getting the following. I'm getting this at /var/log/apache2/error_log: Unable to open file /var/www/pictures/a.jpg, at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/Apache/Gallery.pm line 1303. And on /var/log/gallery-error.log: [Sat Jan 22 22:52:17 2005] [e

Re: [gentoo-user] apache and mod_perl

2005-01-12 Thread Iain Buchanan
On Wed, 2005-01-12 at 21:06 -0600, Qv6 wrote: > I have installed apache2 and want to emerge mod_perl. Problem is: > > emerge mod_perl -av > > indicates that apache-1.3* has to be installed. I think you have to add "apache2" to USE variable. -- Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-user@

[gentoo-user] apache and mod_perl

2005-01-12 Thread Qv6
Guys, I have installed apache2 and want to emerge mod_perl. Problem is: emerge mod_perl -av indicates that apache-1.3* has to be installed. Does anyone have a clue about how to emerge mod_perl without apache-1.3, or do I have to install mod_perl manually, TIA -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing li

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache error

2005-01-12 Thread Qv6
Qv6 wrote: Guys: Need some help starting apache2. Here is the issue. When I start apache, it fails but does not write any error to console. However, my error file show this: [] [error] (2)no such file or directory. cannot create SSLMutex with file '/var/cache/apache2/ssl_mutex.6480' Configurati

RE: [gentoo-user] Apache error

2005-01-12 Thread Dave Nebinger
> [] [error] (2)no such file or directory. cannot create > SSLMutex with file > '/var/cache/apache2/ssl_mutex.6480' > Configuration Failed. Does the /var/cache/apache2 directory exist? Does it have writable permissions by the apache user? -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] Apache error

2005-01-12 Thread Qv6
Guys: Need some help starting apache2. Here is the issue. When I start apache, it fails but does not write any error to console. However, my error file show this: [] [error] (2)no such file or directory. cannot create SSLMutex with file '/var/cache/apache2/ssl_mutex.6480' Configuration Failed.

RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Brenden Walker
> -Original Message- > From: Dan Egli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 5:28 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Brenden

Re: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Dan Egli
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brenden Walker wrote: | That portion of login page appears to be from a large financial institution, | exactly the kind of setup used by scammers. | | I'm not saying you are one, but this looks exactly like the messages I | see on the PHPMailer list ask

RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Brenden Walker
esday, February 04, 2004 4:23 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working > > > > I should say password harvesting. > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Brenden Wa

RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Dan Egli
> I should say password harvesting. > >> -Original Message- >> From: Brenden Walker >> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:53 PM >> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >> Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working >> >> >> You

RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Brenden Walker
I should say password harvesting. > -Original Message- > From: Brenden Walker > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:53 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working > > > You should probably change your example, sur

RE: [gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Brenden Walker
You should probably change your example, sure appears that you're trying to create a spam harvesting page... > -Original Message- > From: Dan Egli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:47 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [gentoo-

[gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Dan Egli
I need a little help here folks. I'm trying to get SSI working on the apache on my laptop. I've tried both 1.3.29 and 2.0.43, and neither wants to parse the statements, despite my best efforts. Here's a sample of my .shtml code: American General Finance - Account Access Welcome to American Gene

[gentoo-user] apache SSI Not Working

2004-02-04 Thread Dan Egli
I need a little help here folks. I'm trying to get SSI working on the apache on my laptop. I've tried both 1.3.29 and 2.0.43, and neither wants to parse the statements, despite my best efforts. Here's a sample of my .shtml code: American General Finance - Account Access Welcome to American Gene

Re: [gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread Eric Paynter
lukas said: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 02:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > >> I was looking ("find"ing ) the unpacked source, so the package >> didn't turn up. So your saying I should "emerge", then untar >> the source, and recompile? I want to hack my own modules, >> naturally these cannot

Re: [gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread lukas
On Saturday 31 January 2004 02:24, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was looking ("find"ing ) the unpacked source, so the package > didn't turn up. So your saying I should "emerge", then untar the > source, and recompile? I want to hack my own modules, naturally > these cannot be emerged. Does eme

Re: [gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread advixkhzyayw
I was looking ("find"ing ) the unpacked source, so the package didn't turn up. So your saying I should "emerge", then untar the source, and recompile? I want to hack my own modules, naturally these cannot be emerged. Does emerge have an option to untar the source? Is it intended for that

Re: [gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread lukas
On Saturday 31 January 2004 01:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, I did that, but I could not find the source code, only the > binaries. Is there an orgument to emerge that would keep the source > somewhere? Would I break anything to recompile mod_perl based on the > emerge fetched sour

Re: [gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread advixkhzyayw
Hi, Yes, I did that, but I could not find the source code, only the binaries. Is there an orgument to emerge that would keep the source somewhere? Would I break anything to recompile mod_perl based on the emerge fetched source? Thanks Peter Wu wrote: --from Peter Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-- --

Re: [gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread Peter Wu
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 06:43:20AM -0800, Allan Peda wrote: > I typically install apache from source, then > recompill with apaci so that I could add optional > modules such as mod_perl, mod_auth etc. With redhat > what I typically do/did was compile with a special > --prefix, and possibly --exec

[gentoo-user] apache from source

2004-01-30 Thread Allan Peda
Hi, I typically install apache from source, then recompill with apaci so that I could add optional modules such as mod_perl, mod_auth etc. With redhat what I typically do/did was compile with a special --prefix, and possibly --exec-prefix and set aside any custom packages in my own spot (/opt/sto

Re: [gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-12 Thread Ted Ozolins
Ben Munat wrote: Well, I've pretty much determined that /etc/apache2/conf/apache2.conf is the right file. The weird thing is that I figured this out by switching the bind port to 8000 in that file... the server then responded on 8000, so I knew it was the right file and switched it back to 80.

Re: [gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-12 Thread Ben Munat
Well, I've pretty much determined that /etc/apache2/conf/apache2.conf is the right file. The weird thing is that I figured this out by switching the bind port to 8000 in that file... the server then responded on 8000, so I knew it was the right file and switched it back to 80. But now it's resp

Re: [gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-12 Thread Martin J. Brown
All my apache2 stuff is in: /usr/local/apache2/conf but I installed from source manually, not from ebuild. I've been installing apache manually for a number of years/versions without problem, AFAICT. Sounds like the ebuild is screwy. Maybe, there's a gentoo reason for it. I don't know. -

Re: [gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-11 Thread Ted Ozolins
Ben Munat wrote: Hmm, I think I missed that blurb about running that command... however, I do have apache2.conf and commonapache2.conf under /etc/apache2/conf. Do you know what the ebuild script does? I have apache running... I (actually my brother) just wanted to edit some configuration stuff

Re: [gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-11 Thread Ben Munat
Hmm, I think I missed that blurb about running that command... however, I do have apache2.conf and commonapache2.conf under /etc/apache2/conf. Do you know what the ebuild script does? I have apache running... I (actually my brother) just wanted to edit some configuration stuff and the apache do

Re: [gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-11 Thread Ted Ozolins
Ben Munat wrote: Does gentoo use /etc/apache2/conf/apache2.conf instead of an httpd.conf file? Some docs I've found online talk about editing httpd.conf, but the only one I can find on my box is under /usr/portage... which is all install files, right? b -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list Ac

[gentoo-user] apache conf

2004-01-11 Thread Ben Munat
Does gentoo use /etc/apache2/conf/apache2.conf instead of an httpd.conf file? Some docs I've found online talk about editing httpd.conf, but the only one I can find on my box is under /usr/portage... which is all install files, right? b -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

[gentoo-user] Apache 2.0.48 fails to start: getpwuid error

2003-11-28 Thread Reinhard Brandstädter
Maybe this hast to be dedicated to an Apache Forum but I'll try here too: After emerging Apache 2.0 I've expected the default server to start smoothly but instead I see a error in the error_log: [Sat Nov 29 00:20:12 2003] [alert] (2)No such file or directory: getpwuid: couldn't determine user n

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-16 Thread Michael Spohn
Yep, thats been the problem, my ~ was rwx-- ! Thanks for your help and all your ideas. Regards, Michael > What permissions do you have on your home-directory? If you have it so > that no users besides your own have permissions to enter it (i.e. ~ = > rwx--) apache won't be able to acces

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-16 Thread Patrick Börjesson
> > What permissions do you have on your home-directory? If you have it > > so that no users besides your own have permissions to enter it (i.e. > > ~ = rwx--) apache won't be able to access ~/public_html either. > > You'll have to set at least x-permissions for all users to your > > home-direc

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-16 Thread Mike Williams
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 16 November 2003 11:46, Patrick Börjesson wrote: > What permissions do you have on your home-directory? If you have it so > that no users besides your own have permissions to enter it (i.e. ~ = > rwx--) apache won't be able to access ~/p

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-16 Thread Patrick Börjesson
> Thanks for the idea, unfortunately it does not work. I changed the > section in my commonapache2.conf: snip > Still I don't have the permission... What permissions do you have on your home-directory? If you have it so that no users besides your own have permissions to enter it (i.e. ~ = rwx--

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Spohn
Thanks for the idea, unfortunately it does not work. I changed the section in my commonapache2.conf: ... snip AllowOverride All Options Indexes SymLinksIfOwnerMatch IncludesNoExec #Options MultiViews -Indexes Includes FollowSymLinks Order allow,deny Allow from all

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-14 Thread Dennis Freise
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 19:00:50 +0100 Dennis Freise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would have liked to test the following before posting, but I managed to > break my libphp4 and am currently rebuilding php - so no testing currently :\ I was able to test it now. It works as I suggested, but you can a

Re: [gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-14 Thread Dennis Freise
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:52:54 +0100 Michael Spohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to install for local users their $HOME/public_html directory > to be accessible under apache 2 pointing the browser to > http://localhost/~username > > I get from the browser: > > Forbidden > You don't ha

[gentoo-user] apache 2 userdir access

2003-11-14 Thread Michael Spohn
Hi, I am trying to install for local users their $HOME/public_html directory to be accessible under apache 2 pointing the browser to http://localhost/~username I get from the browser: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /~michael/cv/index.html on this server. Additionally, a 403 For

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Andrew Gaffney wrote: Lewis Powell wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 13:19, gabriel wrote: what does /var/log/apache2/error_log say? [Sat Nov 01 14:32:07 2003] [alert] (EAI 2)Name or service not known: mod_unique_id: unable to find IPv4 addres s of "ultra" Configuration Failed [Sat Nov 01 22:18:59

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Lewis Powell wrote: On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 13:19, gabriel wrote: what does /var/log/apache2/error_log say? [Sat Nov 01 14:32:07 2003] [alert] (EAI 2)Name or service not known: mod_unique_id: unable to find IPv4 addres s of "ultra" Configuration Failed [Sat Nov 01 22:18:59 2003] [alert] (EAI 2)Na

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Lewis Powell
On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 13:19, gabriel wrote: > what does /var/log/apache2/error_log say? > [Sat Nov 01 14:32:07 2003] [alert] (EAI 2)Name or service not known: mod_unique_id: unable to find IPv4 addres s of "ultra" Configuration Failed [Sat Nov 01 22:18:59 2003] [alert] (EAI 2)Name or service not

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread gabriel
what does /var/log/apache2/error_log say? -- one dissident anywhere is a threat to tyrants everywhere - ken larsen On November 8, 2003 12:47 pm, Lewis Powell wrote: > Ok, let me try this again, I was, it would appear, much to imprecise. > I have previously run, "rc-update add apache2 d

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Lewis Powell
Ok, let me try this again, I was, it would appear, much to imprecise. I have previously run, "rc-update add apache2 default" and that command executed successfully; however, when the computer boots, for some reason, there is an unknown error that prevents apache2 from starting. Oddly, when I run

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Matt Chorman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 08 November 2003 08:53 am, Lewis Powell wrote: > It's already there, it just doesn't actually succeed in starting up. > > Lewis > > I am the blown fuse that blacks you out. I Am Darkwing Duck. > > On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Redeeman wrote: > > ho

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Lewis Powell
It's already there, it just doesn't actually succeed in starting up. Lewis I am the blown fuse that blacks you out. I Am Darkwing Duck. On Sat, 8 Nov 2003, Redeeman wrote: > how do you start it? > > you should do like this: > rc-update add apache2 default > > On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 17:45, Lew

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Redeeman
how do you start it? you should do like this: rc-update add apache2 default On Sat, 2003-11-08 at 17:45, Lewis Powell wrote: > I am running an apache 2 webserver, but it refuses to load appropriately > on system boot. However, when I run /etc/init.d/apache from the > commandline, it starts up

[gentoo-user] Apache 2

2003-11-08 Thread Lewis Powell
I am running an apache 2 webserver, but it refuses to load appropriately on system boot. However, when I run /etc/init.d/apache from the commandline, it starts up without error or problem; how can I troubleshoot this so that the server starts when the computer does? Lewis Powell I am the blow

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache and php

2003-11-05 Thread Mojo B. Nichols
> "Dennis" == Dennis Freise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:09:49 +0100 > Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> after upgrade of apache i had problems too, the documentroot simply >> HAVE to be in /var/www, i have excatly the same files, exactly same >> permissions/owner

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache and php

2003-11-05 Thread Dennis Freise
On Wed, 05 Nov 2003 15:09:49 +0100 Redeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > after upgrade of apache i had problems too, the documentroot simply HAVE > to be in /var/www, i have excatly the same files, exactly same > permissions/owner in both dir, when i use /var/www it works, /home/httpd > it doesent

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache and php

2003-11-05 Thread Redeeman
after upgrade of apache i had problems too, the documentroot simply HAVE to be in /var/www, i have excatly the same files, exactly same permissions/owner in both dir, when i use /var/www it works, /home/httpd it doesent, really weird On Wed, 2003-11-05 at 15:15, Mojo B. Nichols wrote: > I did an u

[gentoo-user] Apache and php

2003-11-05 Thread Mojo B. Nichols
I did an update -pu system; update -pu world. I managed to miss my apache conf file in etc-update:-( so I over wrote my old config) This didn't appear to be a big deal as it just moved the www root. Well then I noticed that my index.php didn't work, so I may have done an emerge mod_php. At any

Re: [gentoo-user] apache & tomcat

2003-10-27 Thread Daniel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > > > Hello, > > > I would like to mount tomcat webapps in apache. I used to use mod_jk > > > but I couldn't find it in portage. I couldn't find mod_webapps either. > > > Is there something in portage that I can use or have I to install > > > mod_jk wi

Re: [gentoo-user] apache & tomcat

2003-10-26 Thread Mario Udina
On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 14:22, mathieu perrenoud wrote: > Hello, > I would like to mount tomcat webapps in apache. I used to use mod_jk but I > couldn't find it in portage. I couldn't find mod_webapps either. Is there > something in portage that I can use or have I to install mod_jk with > traditi

Re: [gentoo-user] apache & tomcat

2003-10-26 Thread mathieu perrenoud
On Sunday 26 October 2003 16:21, Mario Udina wrote: > On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 14:22, mathieu perrenoud wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to mount tomcat webapps in apache. I used to use mod_jk but > > I couldn't find it in portage. I couldn't find mod_webapps either. Is > > there something in portag

[gentoo-user] apache & tomcat

2003-10-26 Thread mathieu perrenoud
Hello, I would like to mount tomcat webapps in apache. I used to use mod_jk but I couldn't find it in portage. I couldn't find mod_webapps either. Is there something in portage that I can use or have I to install mod_jk with traditional means? -- mathieu -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] apache and the need of /etc/hostname

2003-10-14 Thread Claus Ladekjær Wilson
The actual error message: mod_unique_id: Unable to find IPv4 address of "claus_og_christina". Configuration failed. I entered an entry in /etc/hosts as suggested. And now it works Tirsdag den 14. oktober 2003 17:17 skrev Andrew Gaffney: > Claus Ladekjær Wilson wrote: > > If I have an entrance

Re: [gentoo-user] apache and the need of /etc/hostname

2003-10-14 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Claus Ladekjær Wilson wrote: If I have an entrance in /etc/hostname apache2 won't start. Do I need /etc/hostname? How do I configure things so that apache2 will start anyway? (Boot process complains that an entrance in /etc/hostname is missing) What is the actual error message? What is probably ha

[gentoo-user] apache and the need of /etc/hostname

2003-10-14 Thread Claus Ladekjær Wilson
If I have an entrance in /etc/hostname apache2 won't start. Do I need /etc/hostname? How do I configure things so that apache2 will start anyway? (Boot process complains that an entrance in /etc/hostname is missing) -- Venlig hilsen / Greetings from Claus L. Wilson, Linux mdk91 Sdr. Boulevard 22

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2 and mod_perl 1.99.09

2003-10-08 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Doug Weimer wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:42, Andrew Gaffney wrote: Damn, I knew I should have done a diff before blindly copying that one over my existing one. Now everything is borked. I'm getting 403 errors on my scripts in /cgi-bin. Are you using the stable apache2 build? The stable apa

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2 and mod_perl 1.99.09

2003-10-07 Thread Doug Weimer
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 23:42, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Damn, I knew I should have done a diff before blindly copying that one > over my existing one. Now everything is borked. I'm getting 403 errors > on my scripts in /cgi-bin. Are you using the stable apache2 build? The stable apache2's don't us

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2 and mod_perl 1.99.09

2003-10-07 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Andrew Gaffney wrote: Doug Weimer wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 22:04, Andrew Gaffney wrote: Can someone send me a stock /etc/apache2/conf/commonapache2.conf? I've made a lot of modifications trying to make it work. I want to start fresh. You should have one in /usr/portage/net-www/apache/fil

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2 and mod_perl 1.99.09

2003-10-07 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Doug Weimer wrote: On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 22:04, Andrew Gaffney wrote: Can someone send me a stock /etc/apache2/conf/commonapache2.conf? I've made a lot of modifications trying to make it work. I want to start fresh. You should have one in /usr/portage/net-www/apache/files/2.0.40/commonapache2.

  1   2   3   >