On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Ted Ozolins wrote:
> >I'm not 100% sure, but I think you'll only get gigabit speeds with a
> >64-bit, 66MHz interface. Standard PCI may be too slow. Consider the
> >related fact that a 16-bit interface is unable to handle full 100Mbit
> >speeds.
> >
> What happens if you use
Marshal Newrock wrote:
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pär Wedin wrote:
Well, I don't really use the switch. I just used it to compare it with a
100Mbit network. The NIC's are directly connected with a shielded CAT6
cable, so that shouldn't be a problem. The server is a P3-733 with 384MB
ram
On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pär Wedin wrote:
> Well, I don't really use the switch. I just used it to compare it with a
> 100Mbit network. The NIC's are directly connected with a shielded CAT6
> cable, so that shouldn't be a problem. The server is a P3-733 with 384MB
> ram and the files are s
Well, I don't really use the switch. I just used it to compare it with a
100Mbit network. The NIC's are directly connected with a shielded CAT6
cable, so that shouldn't be a problem. The server is a P3-733 with 384MB
ram and the files are served from a lvm partition striped over two IBM
GXP60 7
