OK, Thanks guys :)
James
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote:
> James wrote:
>
>> I was just wondering whether this is a good idea or not (I assume it's
>> not, but I haven't seen anything to confirm this).
>>
>> For example is it OK to emerge update x11-base from x windows?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> James
>
James wrote:
I was just wondering whether this is a good idea or not (I assume it's
not, but I haven't seen anything to confirm this).
For example is it OK to emerge update x11-base from x windows?
Thanks,
James
It's ok, only remember to restart your X server when finished :)
--
No problem is so fo
On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 10:04:15 +, James wrote:
> I was just wondering whether this is a good idea or not (I assume it's
> not, but I haven't seen anything to confirm this).
I've had the occasional problem where an upgrade is spread across several
packages. Konqueror refused to start during a KD
I was just wondering whether this is a good idea or not (I assume it's
not, but I haven't seen anything to confirm this).
For example is it OK to emerge update x11-base from x windows?
Thanks,
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 11:29:03 -0600, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marcin Daczkowski wrote:
> If those packages aren't in the world file *and* they aren't a dependency of
> any
> installed package (the package that needed them has been unmerged, for
> example),
yeah. it must be that
Have you done emerge -sync recently?
-Original Message-
From: Marcin Daczkowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 12:25 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] Updating "world" broken?
Hello!
I have just noticed that pdflib and wine are not
Marcin Daczkowski wrote:
Hello!
I have just noticed that pdflib and wine are not listed by `emerge
-upvD world`. But when I manually do `emerge -upv pdflib` or `emerge
-upv wine` it shows that there are new versions for them. I have
similar problem with cups. But after `euse -E cups` it showed up
Hello!
I have just noticed that pdflib and wine are not listed by `emerge
-upvD world`. But when I manually do `emerge -upv pdflib` or `emerge
-upv wine` it shows that there are new versions for them. I have
similar problem with cups. But after `euse -E cups` it showed up in
`emerge -upvD world`
Thank you very much,
Thomas
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sunday 04 Jan 2004 16:14, Thomas Degris wrote:
/etc/cron.daily and modify the line
> 0 3 * * * rootrm -f /var/spool/cron/lastrun/cron.daily
> for
> 0 * * * * rootrm -f /var/spool/cron/lastrun/cron.daily
> because I would like to update my system every 24h and not every 3h
Then
Thomas Degris wrote:
Hello,
I would like to update the portage tree and the target world every day
automatically. So, I have put my script updategentoo in
/etc/cron.daily and modify the line
0 3 * * * rootrm -f /var/spool/cron/lastrun/cron.daily
for
0 * * * * rootrm -f /var/sp
Hello,
I would like to update the portage tree and the target world every day
automatically. So, I have put my script updategentoo in /etc/cron.daily
and modify the line
0 3 * * * rootrm -f /var/spool/cron/lastrun/cron.daily
for
0 * * * * rootrm -f /var/spool/cron/lastrun/cron.
> Do an "emerge sync" first. Then do "emerge -udp world". That will
> show you what will be updated.
>
> Jeff
I installed gentoo1 1.4 a week or two after it came out and for some
reason there are still no updates...so did emerge sync and to my surprise
there are a whole bunch :-)
Thanks for th
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jason Carson wrote:
>
>> Hi all.. I just want to know if the following command is the right one
>> to
>> use to see if I need to update any packages.
>>
>> emerge -up world
>>
>> It comes up empty.. so does this mean I am fully up to date, or am I
>> doing
>> something wroing
Do an "emerge sync" first. Then do "emerge -udp world". That will
show you what will be updated.
Jeff
Jason Carson wrote:
Hi all.. I just want to know if the following command is the right one to
use to see if I need to update any packages.
emerge -up world
It comes up empty.. so does this
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Jason Carson wrote:
> Hi all.. I just want to know if the following command is the right one to
> use to see if I need to update any packages.
>
> emerge -up world
>
> It comes up empty.. so does this mean I am fully up to date, or am I doing
> something wroing.
>
Hi Jay,
Mak
Add --deep or -D..
Actually.. Your best bet is emerge -Dupvl world.. This will give you a wealth of
information so you can determine the best way to upgrade your packages.
> Hi all.. I just want to know if the following command is the
> right one to
> use to see if I need to update any packages
Hi all.. I just want to know if the following command is the right one to
use to see if I need to update any packages.
emerge -up world
It comes up empty.. so does this mean I am fully up to date, or am I doing
something wroing.
Thanks
-Jay
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 20:31:21 -0700, Lewis Powell muttered:
> I just installed the new portage update, and the result is this output
> from any portage command:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ultraman $ emerge -p world
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 10, in ?
> impo
I just installed the new portage update, and the result is this output
from any portage command:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ultraman $ emerge -p world
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/emerge", line 10, in ?
import
emergehelp,xpak,string,re,commands,time,shutil,traceback,atexit,signal
No not all have headers. They are used for tracking
versions.
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 02:46:19 -0700 (PDT)
Joshua Banks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I'm merging diff's between;
1) /etc/dispatch-conf.conf (and)
/etc/._cfg_dispatch-conf.conf
/etc/._cfg_dispatch-conf.conf has no HEADER.
When I'm merging diff's between;
1) /etc/dispatch-conf.conf (and)
/etc/._cfg_dispatch-conf.conf
/etc/._cfg_dispatch-conf.conf has no HEADER.
Anal question. But should I attatch the header of the old file onto the new one when
merging the
diff's?
Don't all files need to have a header
Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Thursday 31 Jul 2003 15:01, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote:
probably in the near future there will be KDE 3.1.3 available for
normal Gentoo users, right?
I'm just curious: what will happen when I then call an emerge kde?
Will all old settings be preserved, the old KDE sources
On Thursday 31 Jul 2003 15:01, Karl-Heinz Zimmer wrote:
> probably in the near future there will be KDE 3.1.3 available for
> normal Gentoo users, right?
>
> I'm just curious: what will happen when I then call an emerge kde?
>
> Will all old settings be preserved, the old KDE sources+binaries be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
probably in the near future there will be KDE 3.1.3 available for normal
Gentoo users, right?
I'm just curious: what will happen when I then call an emerge kde?
Will all old settings be preserved, the old KDE sources+binaries be
overwritten b
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 19:36:04 -0500
MrPaulAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you are going to be reusing the .config then 'make oldconfig' will
> use all your old settings and only prompt you for new features added
> since your previous kernel version.
>
Just a reminder, never use 'make oldconfi
At 07:18 PM 07/17/2003, you wrote:
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 08:06 PM, Ben Anderson wrote:
I think have some new sources, but I don't think I compiles them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src # ll
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 Jan 28 15:05 linux ->
linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10
drwxr-xr-x
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 08:06 PM, Ben Anderson wrote:
I think have some new sources, but I don't think I compiles them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src # ll
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 Jan 28 15:05 linux ->
linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 Ju
I think have some new sources, but I don't think I compiles them
[EMAIL PROTECTED] src # ll
total 12
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 23 Jan 28 15:05 linux ->
linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10
drwxr-xr-x 16 root root 4096 Jun 21 05:56
linux-2.4.19-gentoo-r10
drwxr-xr-x 16 root r
bryce wrote:
I have updated an ebuild for the next version of software(new version of
transgaming's Point2Play). I tested it on my box and it works, now what
do i do with it?
Submit a bug to bugs.gentoo.org
Use the ebuild category.
Make sure you upload any files/patches and a ChangeLog
MAL
--
[
I have updated an ebuild for the next version of software(new version of
transgaming's Point2Play). I tested it on my box and it works, now what
do i do with it?
thanks,
bryce
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 22:52, Paulo Jorge de Oliveira Cantante de Matos
wrote:
> * Include in your bugreport the contents of:
> *
> *
> /var/tmp/portage/gcc-3.2.2-r2/temp/gcc-3.2.2-branch-update-20030322.patch.b
>z2-7506.out
Well maybe you shoul
Hi all,
I'm getting:
localhost root # emerge -u gcc
Calculating dependencies ...done!
>>> emerge (1 of 1) sys-devel/gcc-3.2.2-r2 to /
>>> md5 ;-) gcc-3.2.2.tar.bz2
>>> md5 ;-) gcc-3.2.2-branch-update-20030322.patch.bz2
>>> md5 ;-) gcc-3.2.2-tls-update2.patch.bz2
>>> Unpacking source...
>>> Unpack
begin quote
On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 07:59:43 -0800
el lodger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do I keep getting this w/gnome updates?
>
> >>> Updating Scrollkeeper
> OMF file [/usr/share/omf/control-center/control-center-C.omf] does not
> validate against ScrollKeeper-OMF DTD:
> /usr/share/xml/scrol
Why do I keep getting this w/gnome updates?
>>> Updating Scrollkeeper
OMF file [/usr/share/omf/control-center/control-center-C.omf] does not
validate against ScrollKeeper-OMF DTD:
/usr/share/xml/scrollkeeper/dtds/scrollkeeper-omf.dtd
Unable to register /usr/share/omf/control-center/control-center-
>
> Just a curiosity, but I'm wondering if I installed from a 1.2
> stage 3 and
> then ran:
> emerge -u system
>
> Would I then have a fully updated 1.4 system?
>
Not quite. I believe gcc (glibc too?) would not be upgraded
without further specific intervention on your part. There is
some gen
Just a curiosity, but I'm wondering if I installed from a 1.2 stage 3 and
then ran:
emerge -u system
Would I then have a fully updated 1.4 system?
In Harmony's Way, and In A Chord,
Tom :-})
Thomas A. Condon
Barbershop Bass Singer
Registered Linux User #154358
A Jester Unemployed
--
[EMAIL P
On 05 Mar 2003 06:20:30 -0600
Alec Berryman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a reason why etc-update doesn't use colors in the output,
> > just like emerge? This could make it much more easy to merge files.
>
> It's not etc-update that doesn't do color, it's diff. Check out your
> /etc/et
> Is there a reason why etc-update doesn't use colors in the output, just like
> emerge? This could make it much more easy to merge files.
It's not etc-update that doesn't do color, it's diff. Check out your
/etc/etc-update.conf for instructions on switching to vimdiff.
--
Alec Berryman <[EMA
Where possible I use etc-update and let it do the
replace/merge as it avoids me making mistakes. However,
sometimes you may have to do it manually.
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 08:44:37 +0100
Magnus Heino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the fast respones guys. I ran etc-update
and chose optio
> > Thanks for the fast respones guys. I ran etc-update and chose option 1
> > "delete old file replace with updated one" should I have followed your
> > method Oliver? I'll post back if there are any errors.
>
> As I remember from your original post the culprit was /etc/make.conf -
> probably
Alec Berryman wrote:
Thanks for the fast respones guys. I ran etc-update and chose option 1
"delete old file replace with updated one" should I have followed your
method Oliver? I'll post back if there are any errors.
As I remember from your original post the culprit was /etc/make.conf -
On Tuesday 04 March 2003 18:57, Oliver Rahm wrote:
> Ben Sparks wrote:
> > Oliver Rahm wrote:
> >> Ben Sparks wrote:
> >>> After I "emerge -u world" everything seems fine, execpt it says
> >>> in bright yellow print "IMPORTANT: 1 config file in /etc needs
> >>> updating. Ok, not a problem right?.
Ben Sparks wrote:
Oliver Rahm wrote:
Ben Sparks wrote:
After I "emerge -u world" everything seems fine, execpt it says in
bright yellow print "IMPORTANT: 1 config file in /etc needs
updating. Ok, not a problem right?...not so much. When I ran the
"find /ect -iname '._cfg???_*' " command it
> Thanks for the fast respones guys. I ran etc-update and chose option 1
> "delete old file replace with updated one" should I have followed your
> method Oliver? I'll post back if there are any errors.
As I remember from your original post the culprit was /etc/make.conf -
probably not the b
Oliver Rahm wrote:
Ben Sparks wrote:
After I "emerge -u world" everything seems fine, execpt it says in
bright yellow print "IMPORTANT: 1 config file in /etc needs
updating. Ok, not a problem right?...not so much. When I ran the
"find /ect -iname '._cfg???_*' " command it states that
/etc/
Ben Sparks wrote:
After I "emerge -u world" everything seems fine, execpt it says in
bright yellow print "IMPORTANT: 1 config file in /etc needs updating.
Ok, not a problem right?...not so much. When I ran the "find /ect
-iname '._cfg???_*' " command it states that /etc/._cfg_make.conf is
On Tue, 2003-03-04 at 17:14, Ben Sparks wrote:
> After I "emerge -u world" everything seems fine, execpt it says in
> bright yellow print "IMPORTANT: 1 config file in /etc needs updating.
> Ok, not a problem right?...not so much. When I ran the "find /ect
> -iname '._cfg???_*' " command it st
After I "emerge -u world" everything seems fine, execpt it says in
bright yellow print "IMPORTANT: 1 config file in /etc needs updating.
Ok, not a problem right?...not so much. When I ran the "find /ect
-iname '._cfg???_*' " command it states that /etc/._cfg_make.conf is
the culprit, but
49 matches
Mail list logo
