Re: [gentoo-user] etc-update make.globals

2003-02-22 Thread Brandon Low
Really the only time you'll see make.globals appear is when you've downgraded portage as you just have. It is quite alrigth in this case to keep the new or the old make.globals, either one will be quite acceptable. I tend to keep the one from the portage I'm downgrading from in this situation,

Re: [gentoo-user] etc-update make.globals

2003-02-22 Thread Carl Hudkins
On Saturday 22 February 2003 21:42, el lodger wrote: > As you can see most of the changes are minor. FEATURES is > commented in my make.conf. I just use the system defaults. > RSYNC_TIMEOUT can be simply commented as well. That leaves only the > header line to change.Should > I replace the origina

[gentoo-user] etc-update make.globals

2003-02-22 Thread el lodger
I just downgraded portage from 2.0.47-r2 to 2.0.46-r12. etc-update lists 1)/etc/make.globals Now I know we are not supposed to edit make.globals and don't ever recall seeing it come up in etc-update. We should edit make.conf instead to make changes in make.global. porc2 root # etc-update Scanning